Currently DW_OP_deref_size just drops the ValueType::FileAddress case and does
not attempt to handle it. This adds support for this case and a test that
verifies this support.
I did a little refactoring since DW_OP_deref and DW_OP_deref_size have some
overlap in code.
Also see: rdar://66870821
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121408
Embedded nul characters are still printed, and they don't terminate the
string. See also D111634.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120803
This ensures that the user is aware that many commands will not work
correctly.
We print the warning only once (per module) to avoid spamming the user
with potentially thousands of error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120892
This allows `image lookup -a ... -v` to print variables only if the given
address is covered by the valid ranges of the variables. Since variables created
in dwarf plugin always has empty scope range, print the variable if it has
empty scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119963
In the rush to get the bot green, I did not realize I was building the
file with -gsplit-dwarf, and therefore the yaml ended up referring to a
file I did not check it.
This rebuilds the file without split dwarf.
In D117744, llvm removed writing support for this format, breaking the
test. We may eventually want to remove reading support as well, but for
now I have converted the test to a yaml file to maintain coverage.
LLDB build were failing due to following two test failures:
lldb-shell :: ObjectFile/ELF/basic-info.yaml
lldb-shell :: SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/debug-types-address-ranges.s
There were caused by commit 6506907a0a1a8a789ad7036ef911f7e31213c9a5
Front-load the first_valid_code_address check, so that we avoid creating
the function object (instead of simply refusing to use it in queries).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112310
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5a672d707390e2c3eaf30a9eb4b075c
Reverted in f9ad1d1c775a8e264bebc15d75e0c6e5c20eefc7 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
This patch fixes a problem introduced by clang change
https://reviews.llvm.org/D95617 and described by
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50076#c6, where inlined functions
omit unused parameters both in the stack trace and in `frame var`
command. With this patch, the parameters are listed correctly in the
stack trace and in `frame var` command.
Specifically, we parse formal parameters from the abstract version of
inlined functions and use those formal parameters if they are missing
from the concrete version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110571
specifically, ignore addresses that point before the first code section.
This resurrects D87172 with several notable changes:
- it fixes a bug where the early exits in InitializeObject left
m_first_code_address "initialized" to LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS (0xfff..f),
which caused _everything_ to be ignored.
- it extends the line table fix to function parsing as well, where it
replaces a similar check which was checking the executable permissions
of the section. This was insufficient because some
position-independent elf executables can have an executable segment
mapped at file address zero. (What makes this fix different is that it
checks for the executable-ness of the sections contained within that
segment, and those will not be at address zero.)
- It uses a different test case, with an elf file with near-zero
addresses, and checks for both line table and function parsing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112058
When we know the bounds of the array, print any embedded nuls instead of
treating them as terminators. An exception to this rule is made for the
nul character at the very end of the string. We don't print that, as
otherwise 99% of the strings would end in \0. This way the strings
usually come out the same as how the user typed it into the compiler
(char foo[] = "with\0nuls"). It also matches how they come out in gdb.
This resolves a FIXME left from D111399, and leaves another FIXME for dealing
with nul characters in "escape-non-printables=false" mode. In this mode the
characters cause the entire summary string to be terminated prematurely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111634
This reverts c7f16ab3e3f27d944db72908c9c1b1b7366f5515 / r109694 - which
suggested this was done to improve consistency with the gdb test suite.
Possible that at the time GCC did not canonicalize integer types, and so
matching types was important for cross-compiler validity, or that it was
only a case of over-constrained test cases that printed out/tested the
exact names of integer types.
In any case neither issue seems to exist today based on my limited
testing - both gdb and lldb canonicalize integer types (in a way that
happens to match Clang's preferred naming, incidentally) and so never
print the original text name produced in the DWARF by GCC or Clang.
This canonicalization appears to be in `integer_types_same_name_p` for
GDB and in `TypeSystemClang::GetBasicTypeEnumeration` for lldb.
(I tested this with one translation unit defining 3 variables - `long`,
`long (*)()`, and `int (*)()`, and another translation unit that had
main, and a function that took `long (*)()` as a parameter - then
compiled them with mismatched compilers (either GCC+Clang, or
Clang+(Clang with this patch applied)) and no matter the combination,
despite the debug info for one CU naming the type "long int" and the
other naming it "long", both debuggers printed out the name as "long"
and were able to correctly perform overload resolution and pass the
`long int (*)()` variable to the `long (*)()` function parameter)
Did find one hiccup, identified by the lldb test suite - that CodeView
was relying on these names to map them to builtin types in that format.
So added some handling for that in LLVM. (these could be split out into
separate patches, but seems small enough to not warrant it - will do
that if there ends up needing any reverti/revisiting)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110455
This patch considers the CU index entry
when reading the .debug_rnglists.dwo section.
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107456
Skeleton vs. DWO units mismatch has been fixed in D106270. As they both
have type DWARFUnit it is a bit difficult to debug. So it is better to
make it safe against future changes.
Reviewed By: kimanh, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107659
When going through the CU entries in the name index,
make sure to compare the name entry's CU
offset against the skeleton CU's offset.
Previously there would be a mismatch, since the
wrong offset was compared, and thus no suitable
entry was found.
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106270
Summary:
In the spirit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D70846, we only return functions with
matching mangled name from Apple/DebugNamesDWARFIndex::GetFunction if
eFunctionNameTypeFull is requested.
This speeds up lookup in the presence of large amount of class methods of the
same name (a typical examples would be constructors of templates with many
instantiations or overloaded operators).
Reviewers: labath, teemperor
Reviewed By: labath, teemperor
Subscribers: aprantl, arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191
This patch fixes the lookup of locations in
.debug_loclists, if they are split in a .dwp file.
Mainly, we need to consider the cu index offsets.
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107161
This change makes sure that DwarfUnit does not load a .dwo file until
necessary. I also take advantage of DWARF 5's guarantee that the first
support file is also the primary file to make it possible to create
a compile unit without loading the .dwo file.
Testcases now require Linux as it is needed for -gsplit-dwarf.
Review By: jankratochvil, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100299
This change makes sure that DwarfUnit does not load a .dwo file until
necessary. I also take advantage of DWARF 5's guarantee that the first
support file is also the primary file to make it possible to create
a compile unit without loading the .dwo file.
Review By: jankratochvil, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100299
This change makes sure that DwarfUnit does not load a .dwo file until
necessary. I also take advantage of DWARF 5's guarantee that the first
support file is also the primary file to make it possible to create
a compile unit without loading the .dwo file.
Review By: jankratochvil, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100299
In D98289#inline-939112 @dblaikie said:
Perhaps this could be more informative about what makes the range list
index of 0 invalid? "index 0 out of range of range list table (with
range list base 0xXXX) with offset entry count of XX (valid indexes
0-(XX-1))" Maybe that's too verbose/not worth worrying about since
this'll only be relevant to DWARF producers trying to debug their
DWARFv5, maybe no one will ever see this message in practice. Just
a thought.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102851
By moving them into a folder with a local lit config
requiring x86. All these tests use x86 target triples.
There are two tests that require target-x86_64 because
they run program files (instead of just needing the backend).
Those are moved to the x86 folder also but their REQUIRES are
unchanged.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100193
