If the types aren't legal, the expansions may get type legalized in a
different way preventing code sharing. If the type is legal, we will
share some instructions between the two expansions, but we will need an
extra register.
Since we don't appear to fold (neg (sub A, B)) if the sub has an
additional user, I think it makes sense not to expand NABS.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120513
InstrRefBasedLDV allocates some big tables of ValueIDNum, to store live-in
and live-out block values in, that then get passed around as pointers
everywhere. This patch wraps the allocation in a std::unique_ptr, names
some types based on unique_ptr, and passes references to those around
instead. There's no functional change, but it makes it clearer to the
reader that references to these tables are borrowed rather than owned, and
we get some extra validity assertions too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118774
This is the SDAG equivalent of an instcombine transform added with:
fd807601a78
This is another step towards solving #49541 and part of an alternative
set of more general transforms than what is proposed in D111530.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ToxaE8
LOGIC (LOGIC (SH X0, Y), Z), (SH X1, Y) --> LOGIC (SH (LOGIC X0, X1), Y), Z
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/QmR9rR
This is a reassociation + factoring fold. The common shift operation is moved
after a bitwise logic op on 2 input operands.
We get simpler cases of these patterns in IR, but I suspect we would miss all
of these exact tests in IR too. We also handle the simpler form of this plus
several other folds in DAGCombiner::hoistLogicOpWithSameOpcodeHands().
This is a partial implementation of a transform suggested in D111530
(only handles 'or' bitwise logic as a first step - need to stamp out more
tests for other opcodes).
Several of the same tests added for D111530 are altered here (but not
fully optimized). I'm not sure yet if this would help/hinder that patch,
but this should be an improvement for all tests added with ecf606cb4329ae
since it removes a shift operation in those examples.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120516
IR level addDiscriminator pass is guarded by DebugInfoForProfiling
(set by option -fdebug-info-for-profiling).
This patch syncs the logic for the MIR and IR level implementations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120536
This reverts commit 029283c1c0d8d06fbf000f5682c56b8595a1101f.
The code in `ELFFile::decodeBBAddrMap` was not changed in the submitted patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120457
If the shl is at least half the bitwidth (i.e. the lower half of the bswap source is zero), then we can reduce the shift and perform the bswap at half the bitwidth and just zero extend.
Based off PR51391 + PR53867
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120192
This is the SDAG translation of D120253 :
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qHpmNn
The SDAG nodes can have different operand types than the result value.
We can see an example of that with AArch64 - the funnel shift amount
is an i64 rather than i32.
We may need to make that match even more flexible to handle
post-legalization nodes, but I have not stepped into that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120264
When parsing MachineMemOperands, MIRParser treated the "align" keyword
the same as "basealign". Really "basealign" should specify the
alignment of the MachinePointerInfo base value, and "align" should
specify the alignment of that base value plus the offset.
This worked OK when the specified alignment was no larger than the
alignment of the offset, but in cases like this it just caused
confusion:
STW killed %18, 4, %stack.1.ap2.i.i :: (store (s32) into %stack.1.ap2.i.i + 4, align 8)
MIRPrinter would never have printed this, with an offset of 4 but an
align of 8, so it must have been written by hand. MIRParser would
interpret "align 8" as "basealign 8", but I think it is better to give
an error and force the user to write "basealign 8" if that is what they
really meant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120400
Change-Id: I7eeeefc55c2df3554ba8d89f8809a2f45ada32d8
The `SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges` function was originally designed for
`CodeGenPrepare` and skipped splitting of edges when the destination
block didn't contain any `PHI` instructions. This only makes sense when
reducing COPYs like `CodeGenPrepare`. In the case of
`PGOInstrumentation` or `GCOVProfiling` it would result in missed
counters and wrong result in functions with computed goto.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120096
Internally to DAGCombiner the SDValues were passed by non-const
reference despite not being modified. They were then passed by
const reference to TLI.
This patch passes them by value which is consistent with the vast
majority of code.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120420
In combineCarryDiamond() use getAsCarry() to find more candidates for being a carry flag.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118362
This is a fix for a regression discussed in:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53829
We cleared more high multiplier bits with 995d400,
but that can lead to worse codegen because we would fail
to recognize the now disguised multiplication by neg-power-of-2
as a shift-left. The problem exists independently of the IR
change in the case that the multiply already had cleared high
bits. We also convert shl+sub into mul+add in instcombine's
negator.
This patch fills in the high-bits to see the shift transform
opportunity. Alive2 attempt to show correctness:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/GgSKVX
The AArch64, RISCV, and MIPS diffs look like clear wins. The
x86 code requires an extra move register in the minimal examples,
but it's still an improvement to get rid of the multiply on all
CPUs that I am aware of (because multiply is never as fast as a
shift).
There's a potential follow-up noted by the TODO comment. We
should already convert that pattern into shl+add in IR, so
it's probably not common:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/7QY_GaFixes#53829
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120216
As requested in D107955 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107955>, this patch
splits off the `MC` and `CodeGen` parts and adds a testcase.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`, `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`, and
`x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120318
Conceptually, the new encoding emits the offsets and sizes as label differences between each two consecutive basic block begin and end label. When decoding, the offsets must be aggregated along with basic block sizes to calculate the final relative-to-function offsets of basic blocks.
This encoding uses smaller values compared to the existing one (offsets relative to function symbol).
Smaller values tend to occupy fewer bytes in ULEB128 encoding. As a result, we get about 25% reduction
in the size of the bb-address-map section (reduction from about 9MB to 7MB).
Reviewed By: tmsriram, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106421
This adds very basic support for hashing MachineBasicBlock
and MachineFunction, for use in MachineFunctionPass to
detect passes that modify the MachineFunction wrongly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120122
We use offloading sections in the new Clang driver scheme to embed
device code into the host. We later use these sections to link the
device image, after which point they are completely unused and should
not be loaded into memory if they are still in the executable.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120275
We found a case in the Swift benchmarks where the MachineOutliner introduces
about a 20% compile time overhead in comparison to building without the
MachineOutliner.
The origin of this slowdown is that the benchmark has long blocks which incur
lots of LRU checks for lots of candidates.
Imagine a case like this:
```
bb:
i1
i2
i3
...
i123456
```
Now imagine that all of the outlining candidates appear early in the block, and
that something like, say, NZCV is defined at the end of the block.
The outliner has to check liveness for certain registers across all candidates,
because outlining from areas where those registers are used is unsafe at call
boundaries.
This is fairly wasteful because in the previously-described case, the outlining
candidates will never appear in an area where those registers are live.
To avoid this, precalculate areas where we will consider outlining from.
Anything outside of these areas is mapped to illegal and not included in the
outlining search space. This allows us to reduce the size of the outliner's
suffix tree as well, giving us a potential memory win.
By precalculating areas, we can also optimize other checks too, like whether
or not LR is live across an outlining candidate.
Doing all of this is about a 16% compile time improvement on the case.
This is likely useful for other targets (e.g. ARM + RISCV) as well, but for now,
this only implements the AArch64 path. The original "is the MBB safe" method
still works as before.
Previous we used sra (X, size(X)-1); xor (add (X, Y), Y).
By placing sub at the end, we allow RISCV to combine sign_extend_inreg
with it to form subw.
Some X86 tests for Z - abs(X) seem to have improved as well.
Other targets look to be a wash.
I had to modify ARM's abs matching code to match from sub instead of
xor. Maybe instead ISD::ABS should be made legal. I'll try that in
parallel to this patch.
This is an alternative to D119099 which was focused on RISCV only.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119171
This code was detecting whether the value returned by getShiftAmountTy
can represent all shift amounts. If not, it would use MVT::i32 as a
placeholder. getShiftAmountTy was updated last year to return i32
if the type returned by the target couldn't represent all values.
This means the MVT::i32 case here is dead and can the logic can
be simplified.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120164
If the "reciprocal-estimates" attribute is present and it doesn't
contain "all", "none", or "default", we previously crashed on f16
operations.
This patch addes an 'h' suffix' to prevent the crash.
I've added simple tests that just enable the estimate for all
vec-sqrt and one test case that explicitly tests the new 'h' suffix
to override the default steps.
There may be some frontend change needed to, but I haven't checked
that yet.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120158
The code was considering shifts by an about larger than the number of
bits in the original VT to be out of range. Shifts exactly equal to
the original bit width are also out of range.
I don't know how to test this. DAGCombiner should usually fold this
away. I just noticed while looking for something else in this code. The
llvm-cov report shows that we don't have coverage for out of range shifts here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120170
getShiftAmountTy will return MVT::i32 if the shift amount
coming from the target's getScalarShiftAmountTy can't reprsent
all possible values. That should eliminate the need to use the
pointer type which is what we do when LegalTypes is false.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120165
If the "reciprocal-estimates" attribute is present and it doesn't
contain "all", "none", or "default", we previously crashed on f16
operations.
This patch addes an 'h' suffix' to prevent the crash.
I've added simple tests that just enable the estimate for all
vec-sqrt and one test case that explicitly tests the new 'h' suffix
to override the default steps.
There may be some frontend change needed to, but I haven't checked
that yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120158
This fold is done in IR:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/jWyFrP
There is an x86 test that shows an improvement
from the added flexibility of using add (commutative).
The other diffs are presumed neutral.
Note that this could also be folded to an 'xor',
but I'm not sure if that would be universally better
(eg, x86 can convert adds more easily into LEA).
This helps prevent regressions from a potential fold for
issue #53829.
Useful for debugging + evaluating improvements to the outliner.
Stats are the number of illegal, legal, and invisible instructions in the
unsigned vector, and it's total length.
This makes three thread local variables (`__THREW__`, `__threwValue`,
and `__wasm_lpad_context`) unconditionally thread local. If the target
doesn't support TLS, they will be downgraded to normal variables in
`stripThreadLocals`. This makes the object not linkable with other
objects using shared memory, which is what we intend here; these
variables should be thread local when used with shared memory. This is
what we initially tried in D88262.
But D88323 changed this: It only created these variables when threads
were supported, because `__THREW__` and `__threwValue` were always
generated even if Emscripten EH/SjLj was not used, making all objects
built without threads not linkable with shared memory, which was too
restrictive. But sometimes this is not safe. If we build an object using
variables such as `__THREW__` without threads, it can be linked to other
objects using shared memory, because the original object's `__THREW__`
was not created thread local to begin with.
So this CL basically reverts D88323 with some additional improvements:
- This checks each of the functions and global variables created within
`LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj` pass and removes it if it's not used at the
end of the pass. So only modules using those variables will be
affected.
- Moves `CoalesceFeaturesAndStripAtomics` and `AtomicExpand` passes
after all other IR pasess that can create thread local variables. It
is not sufficient to move them to the end of `addIRPasses`, because
`__wasm_lpad_context` is created in `WasmEHPrepare`, which runs inside
`addPassesToHandleExceptions`, which runs before `addISelPrepare`. So
we override `addISelPrepare` and move atomic/TLS stripping and
expanding passes there.
This also removes merges `TLS` and `NO-TLS` FileCheck lines into one
`CHECK` line, because in the bitcode level we always create them as
thread local. Also some function declarations are deleted `CHECK` lines
because they are unused.
Reviewed By: tlively, sbc100
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120013
This example is not compilable without handling eviction of specific
subregisters. Last chance recoloring was deciding it could try
evicting an overlapping superregister, which doesn't help make any
progress. The LiveIntervalUnion would then assert due to an
overlapping / identical range when trying the new assignment.
Unfortunately this is also producing a verifier error after the
allocation fails. I've seen a number of these, and not sure if we
should just start deleting the function on error rather than trying to
figure out how to put together valid MIR.
I'm not super confident this is the right place to fix this. I also
have a number of failing testcases I need to fix by handling partial
evictions of superregisters.
The current ABD combine doesn't quite work for SVE because only a
single scalable vector per scalar integer type is legal (e.g. for
i32, <vscale x 4 x i32> is the only legal scalable vector type).
This patch extends the combine to also trigger for the cases when
operand extension must be retained.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115739
When doing SelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesOfValuesWith a worklist is
prepared containing all users that should be updated. Then we use
the RemoveNodeFromCSEMaps/AddModifiedNodeToCSEMaps helpers to handle
recursive CSE updates while doing the replacements.
This patch aims at solving a problem that could arise if the recursive
CSE updates would result in an SDNode present in the worklist is being
removed as a side-effect of morphing a prio user in the worklist.
To examplify such a scenario, imagine that we have these nodes in
the DAG
t12: i64 = add t8, t11
t13: i64 = add t12, t8
t14: i64 = add t11, t11
t15: i64 = add t14, t8
t16: i64 = sub t13, t15
and that the t8 uses should be replaced by t11. An initial worklist
(listing the users that should be morphed) could be [t12, t13, t15].
When updating t12 we get
t12: i64 = add t11, t11
which results in a CSE update that replaces t14 by t12, so we get
t15: i64 = add t12, t8
which results in a CSE update that replaces t13 by t12, so we get
t16: i64 = sub t12, t15
and then t13 is removed given that it was the last use of t13.
So when being done with the updates triggered by rewriting the use
of t8 in t12 the t13 node no longer exist. And we used to end up
hitting an assertion when continuing with the worklist aiming at
replacing the t8 uses in t13.
The solution is based on using a DAGUpdateListener, making sure that
we prune a user from the worklist if it is removed during the
recursive CSE updates.
The bug was found using an OOT target. I think the problem is quite
old, even if the particular intree target reproducer added in this
patch seem to pass when using LLVM 13.0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119088
