This CL is not big but contains changes that span multiple analyses and
passes. This description is very long because it tries to explain basics
on what each pass/analysis does and why we need this change on top of
that. Please feel free to skip parts that are not necessary for your
understanding.
---
`WasmEHFuncInfo` contains the mapping of <EH pad, the EH pad's next
unwind destination>. The value (unwind dest) here is where an exception
should end up when it is not caught by the key (EH pad). We record this
info in WasmEHPrepare to fix catch mismatches, because the CFG itself
does not have this info. A CFG only contains BBs and
predecessor-successor relationship between them, but in `WasmEHFuncInfo`
the unwind destination BB is not necessarily a successor or the key EH
pad BB. Their relationship can be intuitively explained by this C++ code
snippet:
```
try {
try {
foo();
} catch (int) { // EH pad
...
}
} catch (...) { // unwind destination
}
```
So when `foo()` throws, it goes to `catch (int)` first. But if it is not
caught by it, it ends up in the next unwind destination `catch (...)`.
This unwind destination is what you see in `catchswitch`'s
`unwind label %bb` part.
---
`WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` groups exceptions so that they can be sorted
continuously together in CFGSort, as we do for loops. What this analysis
does is very simple: it creates a single `WebAssemblyException` per EH
pad, and all BBs that are dominated by that EH pad are included in this
exception. We also identify subexception relationship in this way: if
EHPad A domiantes EHPad B, EHPad B's exception is a subexception of
EHPad A's exception.
This simple rule turns out to be incorrect in some cases. In
`WasmEHFuncInfo`, if EHPad A's unwind destination is EHPad B, it means
semantically EHPad B should not be included in EHPad A's exception,
because it does not make sense to rethrow/delegate to an inner scope.
This is what happened in CFGStackify as a result of this:
```
try
try
catch
... <- %dest_bb is among here!
end
delegate %dest_bb
```
So this patch adds a phase in `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo::recalculate` to
make sure excptions' unwind destinations are not subexceptions of
their unwind sources in `WasmEHFuncInfo`.
But this alone does not prevent `dest_bb` in the example above from
being sorted within the inner `catch`'s exception, even if its exception
is not a subexception of that `catch`'s exception anymore, because of
how CFGSort works, which will be explained below.
---
CFGSort places BBs within the same `SortRegion` (loop or exception)
continuously together so they can be demarcated with `loop`-`end_loop`
or `catch`-`end_try` in CFGStackify.
`SortRegion` is a wrapper for one of `MachineLoop` or
`WebAssemblyException`. `SortRegionInfo` already does some complicated
things because there discrepancies between those two data structures.
`WebAssemblyException` is what we control, and it is defined as an EH
pad as its header and BBs dominated by the header as its BBs (with a
newly added exception of unwind destinations explained in the previous
paragraph). But `MachineLoop` is an LLVM data structure and uses the
standard loop detection algorithm. So by the algorithm, BBs that are 1.
dominated by the loop header and 2. have a path back to its header.
Because of the second condition, many BBs that are dominated by the loop
header are not included in the loop. So BBs that contain `return` or
branches to outside of the loop are not technically included in
`MachineLoop`, but they can be sorted together with the loop with no
problem.
Maybe to relax the condition, in CFGSort, when we are in a `SortRegion`
we allow sorting of not only BBs that belong to the current innermost
region but also BBs that are by the current region header.
(This was written this way from the first version written by Dan, when
only loops existed.) But now, we have cases in exceptions when EHPad B
is the unwind destination for EHPad A, even if EHPad B is dominated by
EHPad A it should not be included in EHPad A's exception, and should not
be sorted within EHPad A.
One way to make things work, at least correctly, is change `dominates`
condition to `contains` condition for `SortRegion` when sorting BBs, but
this will change compilation results for existing non-EH code and I
can't be sure it will not degrade performance or code size. I think it
will degrade performance because it will force many BBs dominated by a
loop, which don't have the path back to the header, to be placed after
the loop and it will likely to create more branches and blocks.
So this does a little hacky check when adding BBs to `Preferred` list:
(`Preferred` list is a ready list. CFGSort maintains ready list in two
priority queues: `Preferred` and `Ready`. I'm not very sure why, but it
was written that way from the beginning. BBs are first added to
`Preferred` list and then some of them are pushed to `Ready` list, so
here we only need to guard condition for `Preferred` list.)
When adding a BB to `Preferred` list, we check if that BB is an unwind
destination of another BB. To do this, this adds the reverse mapping,
`UnwindDestToSrc`, and getter methods to `WasmEHFuncInfo`. And if the BB
is an unwind destination, it checks if the current stack of regions
(`Entries`) contains its source BB by traversing the stack backwards. If
we find its unwind source in there, we add the BB to its `Deferred`
list, to make sure that unwind destination BB is added to `Preferred`
list only after that region with the unwind source BB is sorted and
popped from the stack.
---
This does not contain a new test that crashes because of this bug, but
this fix changes the result for one of existing test case. This test
case didn't crash because it fortunately didn't contain `delegate` to
the incorrectly placed unwind destination BB.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97247
In every catchpad except `catch (...)`, we add a call to
`_Unwind_CallPersonality`, which is a wapper to call the personality
function. (In most of other Itanium-based architectures the call is done
from libunwind, but in wasm we don't have the control over the VM.)
Because the personatlity function is called to figure out whether the
current exception is a type we should catch, such as `int` or
`SomeClass&`, `catch (...)` does not need the personality function call.
For the same reason, all cleanuppads don't need it.
When we call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`, we store some necessary info in
a data structure called `__wasm_lpad_context` of type
`_Unwind_LandingPadContext`, which is defined in the wasm's port of
libunwind in Emscripten. Also the personality wrapper function returns
some info (selector and the caught pointer) in that data structure, so
it is used as a medium for communication.
One of the info we need to store is the address for LSDA info for the
current function. `wasm.lsda()` intrinsic returns that address. (This
intrinsic will be lowered to a symbol that points to the LSDA address.)
The simpliest thing is call `wasm.lsda()` every time we need to call
`_Unwind_CallPersonality` and store that info in `__wasm_lpad_context`
data structure. But we tried to be better than that (D77423 and some
more previous CLs), so if catchpad A dominates catchpad B and catchpad A
is not `catch (...)`, we didn't insert `wasm.lsda()` call in catchpad B,
thinking that the LSDA address is the same for a single function and we
already visited catchpad A and `__wasm_lpad_context.lsda` field would
already have that value.
But this can be incorrect if there is a call to another function, which
also can have the personality function and LSDA, between catchpad A and
catchpad B, because `__wasm_lpad_context` is a globally defined
structure and the callee function will overwrite its `lsda` field.
So in this CL we don't try to do any optimizaions on adding
`wasm.lsda()` call; we store the result of `wasm.lsda()` every time we
call `_Unwind_CallPersonality`. We can do some complicated analysis,
like checking if there is a function call between the dominating
catchpad and the current catchpad, but at this time it seems overkill.
This deletes three tests because they all tested `wasm.ldsa()` call
optimization.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13548.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97309
This code creates 3 setccs that need to be expanded. It was
creating a sign bit test as setge X, 0 which is non-canonical.
Canonical would be setgt X, -1. This misses the special case in
IntegerExpandSetCCOperands for sign bit tests that assumes
canonical form. If we don't hit this special case we end up
with a multipart setcc instead of just checking the sign of
the high part.
To fix this I've reversed the polarity of all of the setccs to
setlt X, 0 which is canonical. The rest of the logic should
still work. This seems to produce better code on RISCV which
lacks a setgt instruction.
This probably still isn't the best code sequence we could use here.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97181
We don't yet have working codegen for the resulting unmerges, and if
we did it would probably be horrible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97035
This renames variable and method names in `WasmEHFuncInfo` class to be
simpler and clearer. For example, unwind destinations are EH pads by
definition so it doesn't necessarily need to be included in every method
name. Also I am planning to add the reverse mapping in a later CL,
something like `UnwindDestToSrc`, so this renaming will make meanings
clearer.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97173
This also removes a pattern from RISCV that is no longer needed
since the sexti32 on the LHS of the srem in the pattern implies
the result is sign extended so the sign_extend_inreg should be
removed in DAG combine now.
Reviewed By: luismarques, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97133
This patch handles usubsat patterns hidden through zext/trunc and uses the getTruncatedUSUBSAT helper to determine if the USUBSAT can be correctly performed in the truncated form:
zext(x) >= y ? x - trunc(y) : 0 --> usubsat(x,trunc(umin(y,SatLimit)))
zext(x) > y ? x - trunc(y) : 0 --> usubsat(x,trunc(umin(y,SatLimit)))
Based on original examples:
void foo(unsigned short *p, int max, int n) {
int i;
unsigned m;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
m = *--p;
*p = (unsigned short)(m >= max ? m-max : 0);
}
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25987
This can reduce the binary size because counters will no longer occupy
space in the binary, instead they will be allocated by dynamic linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97110
There is a trailing dot in text section name if it has prefix, don't add
repeated dot when connect text section name and symbol name.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96327
Previously we would use the extended implementation, but
the extended implementation requires the vector type to be extended
so that we can access the LLVMContext. In theory we could
detect this case and use the context from the element type instead,
but since I know of no cases hitting this in practice today
I've done the simplest thing.
Also add asserts to several extended EVT functions that assume
LLVMTy is non-null.
Follow from discussion in D97036
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97070
VirtRegAuxInfo is an extensibility point, so the register allocator's
decision on which implementation to use should be communicated to the
other users - namely, LiveRangeEdit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96898
This patch provides two major changes:
1. Add getRelocationInfo to check if a constant will have static, dynamic, or
no relocations. (Also rename the original needsRelocation to needsDynamicRelocation.)
2. Only allow a constant with no relocations (static or dynamic) to be placed
in a mergeable section.
This will allow unused symbols that contain static relocations and happen to
fit in mergeable constant sections (.rodata.cstN) to instead be placed in
unique-named sections if -fdata-sections is used and subsequently garbage collected
by --gc-sections.
See https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-February/148281.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95960
AMDGPU currently has a lot of pre-processing code to pre-split
argument types into 32-bit pieces before passing it to the generic
code in handleAssignments. This is a bit sloppy and also requires some
overly fancy iterator work when building the calls. It's better if all
argument marshalling code is handled directly in
handleAssignments. This handles more situations like decomposing large
element vectors into sub-element sized pieces.
This should mostly be NFC, but does change the generated code by
shifting where the initial argument packing instructions are placed. I
think this is nicer looking, since it now emits the packing code
directly after the relevant copies, rather than after the copies for
the remaining arguments.
This doubles down on gfx6/gfx7 using the gfx8+ ABI for 16-bit
types. This is ultimately the better option, but incompatible with the
DAG. Fixing this requires more work, especially for f16.
If extload is legal, following transform
(zext (select c, load1, load2)) -> (select c, zextload1, zextload2)
can save one ext instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95086
I've now hit several cases where a mistake in the regalloc main loop caused corrupt live intervals that didn't get caught until either the next verify or during post-optimization. The later case is rather confusing and tends to lead one down false trails, so let's catch corruption before that.
Adjust generateFMAsInMachineCombiner to return false if SVE is present
in order to combine fmul+fadd into fma. Also add new pseudo instructions
so as to select the most appropriate of FMLA/FMAD depending on register
allocation.
Depends on D96599
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96424
CheckInteger uses an int64_t encoded using a variable width encoding
that is optimized for encoding a number with a lot of leading zeros.
Negative numbers have no leading zeros so use the largest encoding
requiring 9 bytes.
I believe its most like we want to check for positive and negative
numbers near 0. -1 is quite common due to its use in the 'not'
idiom.
To optimize for this, we can borrow an idea from the bitcode format
and move the sign bit to bit 0 with the magnitude stored in the
upper bits. This will drastically increase the number of leading
zeros for small magnitudes. Then we can run this value through
VBR encoding.
This gives a small reduction in the table size on all in tree
targets except VE where size increased by about 300 bytes due
to intrinsic ids now requiring 3 bytes instead of 2. Since the
intrinsic enum space is shared by all targets this an unfortunate
consquence of where VE is currently located in the range.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96317
GCC warning:
```
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringObjectFileImpl.cpp: In member function ‘virtual llvm::MCSection* llvm::TargetLoweringObjectFileELF::getSectionForLSDA(const llvm::Function&, const llvm::MCSymbol&, const llvm::TargetMachine&) const’:
/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringObjectFileImpl.cpp:871:8: warning: variable ‘IsComdat’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
871 | bool IsComdat = false;
| ^~~~~~~~
```
We are going to support debug sections for XCOFF. So the csect
properties are not necessary. This patch makes these properties
optional.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95931
Same implementation as G_SEXT_INREG.
Add a testcase to combine-sext-inreg for a concrete example, and a testcase
to KnownBitsTest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96897
This adds a G_ASSERT_SEXT opcode, similar to G_ASSERT_ZEXT. This instruction
signifies that an operation was already sign extended from a smaller type.
This is useful for functions with sign-extended parameters.
E.g.
```
define void @foo(i16 signext %x) {
...
}
```
This adds verifier, regbankselect, and instruction selection support for
G_ASSERT_SEXT equivalent to G_ASSERT_ZEXT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96890
D94835 added support for WinEH to export public symbols pointing to
basic blocks which are catchret targets for use with Windows CET.
Wasm currently doesn't support public symbols to non-function code
addresses (they get treated like new functions in asm but then don't
lower to object files correctly).
It created them unconditionally for all catchret targets.
This change disables those symbols unless the exceptionHandlingType
is WinEH (since they aren't used with ExceptionHandling::Wasm)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96824
Interval value
The II value was incremented before exiting the loop, and therefor when
used in the optimization remarks and debug dumps it did not reflect the
initiation interval actually used in Schedule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95692
Fold shuffle(bop(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(z,w)),bop(shuffle(a,b),shuffle(c,d))) -> bop(shuffle(x,y),shuffle(z,w)),bop(shuffle(a,b),shuffle(c,d))
Attempt to fold from a shuffle of a pair of binops to a binop of shuffles, as long as one/both of the binop sources are also shuffles that can be merged with the outer shuffle. This should guarantee that we remove one binop without introducing any additional shuffles.
Technically there's potential for a merged shuffle's lowering to be poorer than the original shuffle, but it could also be better, and I'm not seeing any regressions as long as we keep the 'don't merge splats' rule already present in MergeInnerShuffle.
This expands and generalizes an existing X86 combine and attempts to merge either of each binop's sources (with an on-the-fly commutation of the shuffle mask) - we couldn't do that in the x86 version as it had to stay in a form that DAGCombine's MergeInnerShuffle would still recognise.
Fixes issue raised by @saugustine in rG5aa8f4c0843a where we were failing to replace null shuffle operands from MergeInnerShuffle to UNDEFs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96345
This allows the option to affect the LTO output. Module::Max helps to
generate debug info for all modules in the same format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96597
To make sure compile-times don't regress, add an option to restrict the number
of instructions considered for sinking as alias analysis can be expensive and
for the same reason also skip large blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96485
