This removes existing code duplication and allows us to
assert that we are handling the expected cases.
We have a list of outstanding bugs that could benefit by
handling truncated source values, so that's a possible
addition going forward.
ExpandVectorBuildThroughStack is also used for CONCAT_VECTORS.
However, when calculating the offsets for each of the operands we
incorrectly use the element size rather than actual size and thus
the stores overlap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83303
Summary:
The following combine currently breaks in the DAGCombiner:
```
extract_vector_elt (concat_vectors v4i16:a, v4i16:b), x
-> extract_vector_elt a, x
```
This happens because after we have combined these nodes we have inserted nodes
that use individual instances of the vector element type. In the above example
i16. However this isn't a legal type on all backends, and when the combining pass calls
the legalizer it breaks as it expects types to already be legal. The type legalizer has
already been run, and running it again would make a mess of the nodes.
In the example code at least, the generated code is still efficient after the change.
Reviewers: miyuki, arsenm, dmgreen, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: miyuki, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, wdng, hiraditya, steven.zhang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83231
Occasionally we see absolutely massive basic blocks, typically in global
constructors that are vulnerable to heavy inlining. When these blocks are
dense with DBG_VALUE instructions, we can hit near quadratic complexity in
DwarfDebug's validThroughout function. The problem is caused by:
* validThroughout having to step through all instructions in the block to
examine their lexical scope,
* and a high proportion of instructions in that block being DBG_VALUEs
for a unique variable fragment,
Leading to us stepping through every instruction in the block, for (nearly)
each instruction in the block.
By adding this guard, we force variables in large blocks to use a location
list rather than a single-location expression, as shown in the added test.
This shouldn't change the meaning of the output DWARF at all: instead we
use a less efficient DWARF encoding to avoid a poor-performance code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83236
In DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_ExtendOp I have replaced an invalid
call to getVectorNumElements() with a call to getVectorMinNumElements(),
since the code path works for both fixed and scalable vectors.
This fixes up a warning in the following test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83197
Calling getVectorNumElements() is not safe for scalable vectors and we
should normally use getVectorElementCount() instead. However, for the
code changed in this patch I decided to simply move the instantiation of
the variable 'OutNumElems' lower down to the place where only fixed-width
vectors are used, and hence it is safe to call getVectorNumElements().
Fixes up one warning in this test:
sve-sext-zext.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83195
For the GetElementPtr case in function
AddressingModeMatcher::matchOperationAddr
I've changed the code to use the TypeSize class instead of relying
upon the implicit conversion to a uint64_t. As part of this we now
check for scalable types and if we encounter one just bail out for
now as the subsequent optimisations doesn't currently support them.
This changes fixes up all warnings in the following tests:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-ld1-addressing-mode-reg-imm.ll
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-st1-addressing-mode-reg-imm.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83124
`__stack_chk_fail` does not return, but `unreachable` was not generated
following `call __stack_chk_fail`. This had a possibility to generate an
invalid binary for functions with a return type, because
`__stack_chk_fail`'s return type is void and `call __stack_chk_fail` can
be the last instruction in the function whose return type is non-void.
Generating `unreachable` after it makes sure CFGStackify's
`fixEndsAtEndOfFunction` handles it correctly.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83277
handleAssignments was assuming every argument type is an MVT, and
assignArg would always fail. This fixes one of the hacks in the
current AMDGPU calling convention code that pre-processes the
arguments.
This is inspired by D81648. The basic idea is to have the set of SDValues which are lowered as either constants or direct frame references explicit in one place, and to separate them clearly from the spilling logic.
This is not NFC in that the handling of constants larger than > 64 bit has changed. The old lowering would crash on values which could not be encoded as a sign extended 64 bit value. The new lowering just spills all constants > 64 bits. We could be consistent about doing the sext(Con64) optimization, but I happen to know that this code path is utterly unexercised in practice, so simple is better for now.
handleMoveDown or handleMoveUp cannot properly repair a main
range of a LiveInterval since they only get LiveRange. There
is a problem if certain use has moved few segments away and
there is a hole in the main range in between of these two
locations. We may get a SubRange with a very extended Segment
spanning several Segments of the main range and also spanning
that hole. If that happens then we end up with the main range
not covering its SubRange which is an error.
It might be possible to attempt fixing the main range in place
just between of the old and new index by extending all of its
Segments in between, but it is unclear this logic will be
faster than just straight constructMainRangeFromSubranges,
which itself is pretty cheap since it only contains interval
logic. That will also require shrinkToUses() call after which
is probably even more expensive.
In the test second move is from 64B to 92B for the sub1.
Subrange is correctly fixed:
L000000000000000C [16r,32B:0)[32B,92r:1) 0@16r 1@32B-phi
But the main range has a hole in between 80d and 88r after
updateRange():
%1 [16r,32B:0)[32B,80r:4)[80r,80d:3)[88r,96r:1)[96r,160B:2)
Since source position is 64B this segment is not even considered
by the updateRange().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82916
Summary:
When splitting a store of a scalable type, the new address is
calculated in SplitVecOp_STORE using a vscale and an add instruction.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83041
Summary:
When splitting a load of a scalable type, the new address is
calculated in SplitVecRes_LOAD using a vscale and an add instruction.
This patch also adds a DAG combiner fold to visitADD for vscale:
- Fold (add (vscale(C0)), (vscale(C1))) to (add (vscale(C0 + C1)))
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, david-arm
Reviewed By: david-arm
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82792
In an earlier commit 584d0d5c1749c13625a5d322178ccb4121eea610 I
added functionality to allow AArch64 CodeGen support for falling
back to DAG ISel when Global ISel encounters scalable vector
types. However, it seems that we were not falling back early
enough as llvm::getLLTForType was still being invoked for scalable
vector types.
I've added a new fallback function to the call lowering class in
order to catch this problem early enough, rather than wait for
lowerFormalArguments to reject scalable vector types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82524
This patch fixes all remaining warnings in:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-trunc.ll
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I hit some warnings related to getCopyPartsToVector. I fixed two
issues:
1. In widenVectorToPartType() we assumed that we'd always be
using BUILD_VECTOR nodes to expand from one vector type to another,
which is incorrect for scalable vector types. I've fixed this for now
by simply bailing out immediately for scalable vectors.
2. In getCopyToPartsVector() I've changed the code to compare
the element counts of different types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83028
X / (fabs(A) * sqrt(Z)) --> X / sqrt(A*A*Z) --> X * rsqrt(A*A*Z)
In the motivating case from PR46406:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46406
...this is restoring the sequence that was originally in the source code.
We extracted a term from within the sqrt because we do not know in
instcombine whether a target will expand a sqrt call.
Note: we could say that the transform in IR should be restricted, but
that would not solve the problem if the source was originally in the
pattern shown here.
This is a gray area for fast-math-flag requirements. I think we should at
least check fast-math-flags on the fdiv and fmul because I view this
transform as 2 pieces: reassociate the fmul operands and form reciprocal
from the fdiv (as with the existing transform). We could argue that the
sqrt also needs FMF, but that was not required before, so we should change
that in a follow-up patch if that seems better.
We don't currently have a way to check that the target will produce a sqrt
or recip estimate without actually creating nodes (the APIs are SDValue
getSqrtEstimate() and SDValue getRecipEstimate()), so we clean up
speculatively created nodes if we are not able to create an estimate.
The x86 test with doubles verifies that we are not changing a test with
no estimate sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82716
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how children are stored. This will enable
subsequent type-erasure changes.
New methods are introduced to cover common access patterns.
Change-Id: Idb5f4b1b9c84e4cc71ddb39bb52a388682f5674f
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, wdng, hiraditya, jrtc27, zzheng, atanasyan, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83083
Summary:
When a desired symbol name contains invalid character that the
system assembler could not process, we need to emit .rename
directive in assembly path in order for that desired symbol name
to appear in the symbol table.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, DiggerLin, daltenty, Xiangling_L
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82481
This matches the DAG behavior where this is called after the loop
checking for calls. The AMDGPU implementation depends on knowing if
there are calls in the function or not, so move this later.
Another problem is finalizeLowering is actually called twice; I was
seeing weird inconsistencies since the first call would produce
unexpected results and the second run would correct them in some
contexts. Since this requires disabling the verifier, and it's useful
to serialize the MIR immediately after selection, FinalizeISel should
probably not be a real pass.
Use a simpler code sequence when the shift amount is known not to be
zero modulo the bit width.
Nothing much uses this until D77152 changes the translation of fshl and
fshr intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82540
Using a negation instead of a subtraction from a constant can save an
instruction on some targets.
Nothing much uses this until D77152 changes the translation of fshl and
fshr intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82539
We need to ensure that the sign bits of the result all match
so we can't fold to undef.
Similar to PR46585.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83163
zext_vector_inreg needs to produces 0s in the extended bits and
sext_vector_inreg needs to produce upper bits that are all the
same. So we should fold them to a 0 vector instead of undef.
Fixes PR46585.
Currently matchBinOpReduction only handles shufflevector reduction patterns, but in many cases these only occur in the final stages of a reduction, once we're down to legal vector widths.
Before this its likely that we are performing reductions using subvector extractions to repeatedly split the source vector in half and perform the binop on the halves.
Assuming we've found a non-partial reduction, this patch continues looking for subvector reductions as far as it can beyond the last shufflevector.
Fixes PR37890
Given a loop with two subloops, it should be possible for both to be
converted to hardware loops. That's what this patch does, simply enough.
It slightly alters the loop iterating order to try and convert all
subloops. If one (or more) succeeds, it stops as before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78502
SelectionDAGBuilder converts logic-of-compares into multiple branches based
on a boolean TLI setting in isJumpExpensive(). But that probably never
considered the pattern of extracted bools from a vector compare - it seems
unlikely that we would want to turn vector logic into control-flow.
The motivating x86 reduction case is shown in PR44565:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44565
...and that test shows the expected improvement from using pmovmsk codegen.
For AArch64, I modified the test to include an extra op because the simpler
test gets transformed by a codegen invocation of SimplifyCFG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82602
There was a rogue 'assert' in AArch64ISelLowering for the tuple.get intrinsics,
that shouldn't really have been there (I suspect this was a remnant from when
we expected the wider vector always to have come from a vector CONCAT).
When I tried to create a more minimal reproducer, I found a bug in
DAGCombiner where it drops the scalable flag when trying to fold:
extract_subv (bitcast X), Index --> bitcast (extract_subv X, Index')
This patch fixes both issues.
Reviewers: david-arm, efriedma, spatel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82910
Whilst trying to assemble the following test:
clang/test/CodeGen/aarch64-sve-intrinsics/acle_sve_set2.c
I discovered we were hitting some warnings about possible invalid
calls to getVectorNumElements() in getCopyToPartsVector(). I've
tried to fix these by using ElementCount types where possible and
I've made the assumption that we don't support using a fixed width
vector to copy parts of a scalable vector, and vice versa. Looking
at how the copy is implemented I think that's the right thing for
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82744
This patch uses ranges for debug information when a function contains basic block sections rather than using [lowpc, highpc]. This is also the first in a series of patches for debug info and does not contain the support for linker relaxation. That will be done as a follow up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78851
The caller can't handle the node having multiple results like a
masked load does. So we need to detect the case and do our own
result replacement.
Fixes PR46532.
In visitSCALAR_TO_VECTOR we try to optimise cases such as:
scalar_to_vector (extract_vector_elt %x)
into vector shuffles of %x. However, it led to numerous warnings
when %x is a scalable vector type, so for now I've changed the
code to only perform the combination on fixed length vectors.
Although we probably could change the code to work with scalable
vectors in certain cases, without a proper profit analysis it
doesn't seem worth it at the moment.
This change fixes up one of the warnings in:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-merging-stores.ll
I've also added a simplified version of the same test to:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-fp.ll
which already has checks for no warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82872
Before this instruction supported output values, it fit fairly
naturally as a terminator. However, being a terminator while also
supporting outputs causes some trouble, as the physreg->vreg COPY
operations cannot be in the same block.
Modeling it as a non-terminator allows it to be handled the same way
as invoke is handled already.
Most of the changes here were created by auditing all the existing
users of MachineBasicBlock::isEHPad() and
MachineBasicBlock::hasEHPadSuccessor(), and adding calls to
isInlineAsmBrIndirectTarget or mayHaveInlineAsmBr, as appropriate.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79794
This prevents the outlined functions from pulling in a lot of unnecessary code
in our downstream libraries/linker. Which stops outlining making codesize
worse in c++ code with no-exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57254
As per documentation of `hasPairLoad`:
"`RequiredAlignment` gives the minimal alignment constraints that must be met to be able to select this paired load."
In this sense, `0` is strictly equivalent to `1`. We make this obvious by using `Align` instead of unsigned.
There is only one implementor of this interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82958
It's perfectly valid to do certain DAG combines where we extract
subvectors from a concat vector when we have scalable vector types.
However, we can do this in a way that avoids generating compiler
warnings by replacing calls to getVectorNumElements() with
getVectorMinNumElements(). Due to the way subvector extracts are
designed to work with scalable vector types this is ok.
This eliminates some warnings from existing tests in this file:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sve-intrinsics-loads.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82655
Summary:
This is a fix for PR45009.
When working on D67492 I made DwarfExpression emit a single
DW_OP_entry_value operation covering the whole composite location
description that is produced if a register does not have a valid DWARF
number, and is instead composed of multiple register pieces. Looking
closer at the standard, this appears to not be valid DWARF. A
DW_OP_entry_value operation's block can only be a DWARF expression or a
register location description, so it appears to not be valid for it to
hold a composite location description like that.
See DWARFv5 sec. 2.5.1.7:
"The DW_OP_entry_value operation pushes the value that the described
location held upon entering the current subprogram. It has two
operands: an unsigned LEB128 length, followed by a block containing a
DWARF expression or a register location description (see Section
2.6.1.1.3 on page 39)."
Here is a dwarf-discuss mail thread regarding this:
http://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org/2020-March/004610.html
There was not a strong consensus reached there, but people seem to lean
towards that operations specified under 2.6 (e.g. DW_OP_piece) may not
be part of a DWARF expression, and thus the DW_OP_entry_value operation
can't contain those.
Perhaps we instead want to emit a entry value operation per each
DW_OP_reg* operation, e.g.:
- DW_OP_entry_value(DW_OP_regx sub_reg0),
DW_OP_stack_value,
DW_OP_piece 8,
- DW_OP_entry_value(DW_OP_regx sub_reg1),
DW_OP_stack_value,
DW_OP_piece 8,
[...]
The question then becomes how the call site should look; should a
composite location description be emitted there, and we then leave it up
to the debugger to match those two composite location descriptions?
Another alternative could be to emit a call site parameter entry for
each sub-register, but firstly I'm unsure if that is even valid DWARF,
and secondly it seems like that would complicate the collection of call
site values quite a bit. As far as I can tell GCC does not emit any
entry values / call sites in these cases, so we do not have something to
compare with, but the former seems like the more reasonable approach.
Currently when trying to emit a call site entry for a parameter composed
of multiple DWARF registers a (DwarfRegs.size() == 1) assert is
triggered in addMachineRegExpression(). Until the call site
representation is figured out, and until there is use for these entry
values in practice, this commit simply stops the invalid DWARF from
being emitted.
Reviewers: djtodoro, vsk, aprantl
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: jyknight, hiraditya, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75270
