SelectionDAG::transferDbgValues() can 'reattach' SDDbgValue from one to
another node, but doesn't change its source order. If the destination node has
the order greater than the SDDbgValue, there are two possible issues
revealed later:
* If debug info is attached to an instruction that is the first definition
of a register, this ends up with a def-after-use and the debug info
gets 'undef' later.
* If MIR has another definition of a register above the debug info,
the debug info may represent a source variable incorrectly because
it appears (significantly) before an instruction corresponded
to this debug info.
So, the patch changes the order of an SDDbgValue when it is moved
to a node with greater order.
Reviewers: dblaikie, jmorse, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71175
Having TypeSize as a static class variable was causing problems
with multi-threading. Several static functions have now been
converted into methods of TypePromotion and a few other members
of TypePromotion and IRPromoter have been added or removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71832
Fix several several additional problems with the int <-> FP conversion
logic both in common code and in the X86 target. In particular:
- The STRICT_FP_TO_UINT expansion emits a floating-point compare. This
compare can raise exceptions and therefore needs to be a strict compare.
I've made it signaling (even though quiet would also be correct) as
signaling is the more usual default for an LT. This code exists both
in common code and in the X86 target.
- The STRICT_UINT_TO_FP expansion algorithm was incorrect for strict mode:
it emitted two STRICT_SINT_TO_FP nodes and then used a select to choose one
of the results. This can cause spurious exceptions by the STRICT_SINT_TO_FP
that ends up not chosen. I've fixed the algorithm to use only a single
STRICT_SINT_TO_FP instead.
- The !isStrictFPEnabled logic in DoInstructionSelection would sometimes do
the wrong thing because it calls getOperationAction using the result VT.
But for some opcodes, incuding [SU]INT_TO_FP, getOperationAction needs to
be called using the operand VT.
- Remove some (obsolete) code in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select that would mutate
STRICT_FP_TO_[SU]INT to non-strict versions unnecessarily.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71840
This moves the X86 specific transform from rL364407
into DAGCombiner to generically handle 'little to big' cases
(for example: extract_subvector(v2i64 bitcast(v16i8))). This
allows us to remove both the x86 implementation and the aarch64
bitcast(extract_subvector(bitcast())) combine.
Earlier patches that dealt with regressions initially exposed
by this patch:
rG5e5e99c041e4
rG0b38af89e2c0
Patch by: @RKSimon (Simon Pilgrim)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63815
As the extern_weak target might be missing, resolving to the absolute
address zero, we can't use the normal direct PC-relative branch
instructions (as that would result in relocations out of range).
Improve the classifyGlobalFunctionReference method to set
MO_DLLIMPORT/MO_COFFSTUB, and simplify the existing code in
AArch64TargetLowering::LowerCall to use the return value from
classifyGlobalFunctionReference for these cases.
Add code in both AArch64FastISel and GlobalISel/IRTranslator to
bail out for function calls to extern weak functions on windows,
to let SelectionDAG handle them.
This matches what was done for X86 in 6bf108d77a3c.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71721
Summary:
Without this check unnecessary FMA instructions are generated when the FSUB terms are reused.
This also has the side-effect that the same value is computed to different levels of precision, which can create undesirable effects if the results are used together in subsequent computation.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, foad, tpr, dstuttard, spatel
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71656
Summary:
We noticed in Julia that the sequence below no longer turned into
a sequence of FMA instructions in LLVM 7+, but it did in LLVM 6.
```
%29 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load, %wide.load16
%30 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load13, %wide.load17
%31 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load14, %wide.load18
%32 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load15, %wide.load19
%33 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi, %29
%34 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi10, %30
%35 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi11, %31
%36 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi12, %32
```
Unlike Clang, Julia doesn't set the `unsafe-fp-math=true` function
attribute, but rather emits more local instruction flags.
This partially undoes https://reviews.llvm.org/D46854 and if required I can try to minimize the test further.
Reviewers: spatel, mcberg2017
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: chriselrod, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71495
This reverts commit ee7579409b7d940c4e1314d126e900db30c4edff.
It causes crashes during ThinLTO. I suspect the issue is related to
races on the global TypeSize variable, which is 80 at the time of the
crash.
Summary:
This is documented as the appropriate template modifier for call operands.
Fixes PR44272, and adds a regression test.
Also adds support for operand modifiers in Intel-style inline assembly.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71677
Having this function be recursive could use up way too much stack space.
Rewrite it as an iterative traversal in the tree instead to prevent this.
Fixes PR44344.
It isn't necessary to create DIEs for all of the declaration subprograms
in a CU's retainedTypes list. We can defer creating these subprograms
until we need to prepare a call site tag that refers to one.
This cleanup was mentioned in passing in D70350.
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
Extends DWARF expression language to express locals/globals locations. (via
target-index operands atm) (possible variants are: non-virtual registers
or address spaces)
The WebAssemblyExplicitLocals can replace virtual registers to targertindex
operand type at the time when WebAssembly backend introduces
{get,set,tee}_local instead of corresponding virtual registers.
Reviewed By: aprantl, dschuff
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52634
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
The calculator was considering instructions such as KILLs as clobbers
of a physical address. This is wrong as meta instructions such as KILLs
produce no output in the final program and thus don't clobber or change
any physical location's value. As a result they're safe to ignore whilst
calculating location list ranges.
reviewers: aprantl, vsk
diff revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70497
fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38753
1) Fix an issue with the incorrect value being used for the number of
elements being passed to [d|w]lstp. We were trying to check that
the value was available at LoopStart, but this doesn't consider
that the last instruction in the block could also define the
register. Two helpers have been added to RDA for this.
2) Insert some code to now try to move the element count def or the
insertion point so that we can perform more tail predication.
3) Related to (1), the same off-by-one could prevent us from
generating a low-overhead loop when a mov lr could have been
the last instruction in the block.
4) Fix up some instruction attributes so that not all the
low-overhead loop instructions are labelled as branches and
terminators - as this is not true for dls/dlstp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71609
Recommit after making the same API change in non-x86 targets. This has been build for all targets, and tested for effected ones. Why the difference? Because my disk filled up when I tried make check for all.
For auto-padding assembler support, we'll need to bundle the label with the instructions (nops or call sequences) so that they don't get separated. This just rearranges the code to make the upcoming change more obvious.
For auto-padding assembler support, we'll need to bundle the label with the instructions (nops or call sequences) so that they don't get separated. This just rearranges the code to make the upcoming change more obvious.
This is in advance of assembler padding directives support where we'll need to bundle the label w/the corresponding faulting instruction to avoid padding being inserted between.
Since the address pool doesn't get populated in this case (due to the
lack of inlining, no child DIEs are added to the CU - so no addresses
are needed for the DIEs themselves) until the range list is emitted - at
the time the attributes are added to the CU, the address pool is empty.
So check whether the address pool will be used for the range lists & add
an addr_base if that's the case.
Move these data structures closer together so their emission code can
eventually share more of its implementation.
Was an egregious bug (completely untested, evidently) where I hadn't
inverted a DWARFv5 test as needed, so it was doing the exact opposite of
what was required & thus tried to emit a DWARFv5 range list header in
DWARFv4.
Reapply 8e04896288d22ed8bef7ac367923374f96b753d6 which was
reverted in a8154e5e0c83d2f0f65f3b4fb1a0bc68785bd975.
Add new intrinsics
llvm.experimental.constrained.minimum
llvm.experimental.constrained.maximum
as strict versions of llvm.minimum and llvm.maximum.
Includes SystemZ back-end support.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71624
getTargetConstant prevents any optimizations from operating on the
value and basically says its already been iseled. But since we
want the index to be in a register, this isn't true.
Prior to this we were generating a vbroadcast with an immediate
argument which is illegal and was flagged by the expensive checks
bot.
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1f2b8f72b9d59e2b4221b12fb7f9a95, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e57428ce364d3d6c075ff03cb8973462.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
Summary:
r347747 added support for clustering mem ops with FI base operands
including support for fixed stack objects in shouldClusterFI, but
apparently this was never tested.
This patch fixes shouldClusterFI to work with scaled as well as
unscaled load/store instructions, and fixes the ordering of memory ops
in MemOpInfo::operator< to ensure that memory addresses always
increase, regardless of which direction the stack grows.
Subscribers: MatzeB, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, javed.absar, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71334
Add an extra parameter so alignment can be taken under
consideration in gather/scatter legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71610
Summary: Add calculation for elements in structures in getting uniform
base for the Gather/Scatter intrinsic.
Reviewers: craig.topper, c-rhodes, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71442
The caller will assert for nodes with more than 2 results unless
we return a null SDValue.
I tried to test this by copying an AArch64 test for ScalarizeVecOp_FP_ROUND.
While it did hit the assert and this commited fixed that. It also
hit a later problem that couldn't be fixed without adding strict
FP support to AArch64.
This started with adding a test to support get code coverage on
ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP by copying an existing AArch64 test
and using constrained sitofp/uitofp intrinsics.
This found 3 separate issues:
-ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP needs to do its own replacement
because the caller can't handle replacing multiple results.
-Missing integer promotion support for sitofp/uitofp
-Chain result not always assigned in ExpandLegalINT_TO_FP.
Committing them together so I can add the test case.
added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission."
This was reverted in caa412090666c10f854322cdc701c1cbf8ed726e,
since it was causing an assertion failure on Windows bots.
This revision is revised to fix that.
Original commit message -
[DebugInfo] Refactored macro related generation, added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71008
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
