In many cases, calls to isShiftedMask are immediately followed with checks to determine the size and position of the bitmask.
This patch adds variants of APInt::isShiftedMask, isShiftedMask_32 and isShiftedMask_64 that return these values as additional arguments.
I've updated a number of cases that were either performing seperate size/position calculations or had created their own local wrapper versions of these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119019
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
We were using auto instead of auto* in a number of places which failed the llvm-qualified-auto check.
Additionally we were using auto in some places where the type wasn't immediately obvious - the style guide rule of thumb is only to use auto from casts etc. where the type is already explicitly stated.
Same as other CreateLoad-style APIs, these need an explicit type
argument to support opaque pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105395
This patch updates X86InstCombineIntrinsic.cpp to use the newly updated CreateShuffleVector.
The tests are updated because the updated CreateShuffleVector uses poison value for the second vector.
If I didn't miss something, the masks in the tests are choosing elements from the first vector only; therefore the tests are having equivalent behavior.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94059
This transform was added at:
c63799fc52ff
From what I see, it's the first demanded elements transform that adds
a new instruction using the IRBuilder. There are similar folds in
the generic demanded bits chunk of instcombine that also use the
InsertPointGuard code pattern.
The tests here would assert/crash because the new instruction was
being added at the start of the demanded elements analysis rather
than at the instruction that is being replaced.
Pass through the demanded elts mask to the source operands.
The next step will be to add support for folding to add/sub if we only demand odd/even elements.
If the mask of a pdep or pext instruction is a shift masked (i.e. one contiguous block of ones) we need at most one and and one shift to represent the operation without the intrinsic. One all platforms I know of, this is faster than the pdep/pext.
The cost modelling for multiple contiguous blocks might be worth exploring in a follow up, but it's not relevant for my current use case. It would almost certainly be a win on AMDs where these are really really slow though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87861
As detailed on PR11210, if the mask is known to come from a (sign extended) bool vector (e.g. comparisons) then we can represent with a generic masked load/store without losing anything.
We already do something similar for BLENDV -> SELECT conversion.
When we use mask compare intrinsics under strict FP option, the masked
elements shouldn't raise any exception. So, we cann't replace the
intrinsic with a full compare + "and" operation.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85385
For a long time, the InstCombine pass handled target specific
intrinsics. Having target specific code in general passes was noted as
an area for improvement for a long time.
D81728 moves most target specific code out of the InstCombine pass.
Applying the target specific combinations in an extra pass would
probably result in inferior optimizations compared to the current
fixed-point iteration, therefore the InstCombine pass resorts to newly
introduced functions in the TargetTransformInfo when it encounters
unknown intrinsics.
The patch should not have any effect on generated code (under the
assumption that code never uses intrinsics from a foreign target).
This introduces three new functions:
TargetTransformInfo::instCombineIntrinsic
TargetTransformInfo::simplifyDemandedUseBitsIntrinsic
TargetTransformInfo::simplifyDemandedVectorEltsIntrinsic
A few target specific parts are left in the InstCombine folder, where
it makes sense to share code. The largest left-over part in
InstCombineCalls.cpp is the code shared between arm and aarch64.
This allows to move about 3000 lines out from InstCombine to the targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81728
