Re-commit of 32e8b550e5439c7e4aafa73894faffd5f25d0d05
This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.
The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes
A correct unwind info could look like:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
`-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.
Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
It caused builds to assert with:
(StackSize == 0 && "We already have the CFA offset!"),
function generateCompactUnwindEncoding, file AArch64AsmBackend.cpp, line 624.
when targeting iOS. See comment on the code review for reproducer.
> This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
> DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.
>
> The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
> function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
> but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
> at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:
>
> ```
> stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
> mov x29, sp
> .cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
> ...
> ```
>
> after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
> the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes
>
> A correct unwind info could look like:
> ```
> stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
> .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> mov x29, sp
> .cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
> ...
> ```
>
> Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
> sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
> goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
> `-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.
>
> Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
This reverts commit 32e8b550e5439c7e4aafa73894faffd5f25d0d05.
This patch rearranges emission of CFI instructions, so the resulting
DWARF and `.eh_frame` information is precise at every instruction.
The current state is that the unwind info is emitted only after the
function prologue. This is fine for synchronous (e.g. C++) exceptions,
but the information is generally incorrect when the program counter is
at an instruction in the prologue or the epilogue, for example:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
after the `stp` is executed the (initial) rule for the CFA still says
the CFA is in the `sp`, even though it's already offset by 16 bytes
A correct unwind info could look like:
```
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! // 16-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
mov x29, sp
.cfi_def_cfa w29, 16
...
```
Having this information precise up to an instruction is useful for
sampling profilers that would like to get a stack backtrace. The end
goal (towards this patch is just a step) is to have fully working
`-fasynchronous-unwind-tables`.
Reviewed By: danielkiss, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111411
When inserting an unpacked FP subvector into a packed vector we
can simply cast the unpacked value into a packed value, since
both types are legal for SVE. We can then use this as the input
for the UZP instruction. This avoids us expanding the operation
by going through the stack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113270
When created a UUNPKLO/HI node with an undef input then the
output should also be undef. I've added a target DAG combine
function to ensure we avoid creating an unnecessary uunpklo/hi
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113266
Add support for generating TargetFrameIndex in complex patterns for
indexed addressing modes in SVE. Additionally, add missing load/stores
to getMemOpInfo and getLoadStoreImmIdx.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112617
Widens the result and first input vector because they have the same size.
The subvector to be inserted is widened in the operand widen function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112187
When inserting a scalable subvector into a scalable vector through
the stack, the index to store to needs to be scaled by vscale.
Before this patch, that didn't yet happen, so it would generate the
wrong offset, thus storing a subvector to the incorrect address
and overwriting the wrong lanes.
For some insert:
nxv8f16 insert_subvector(nxv8f16 %vec, nxv2f16 %subvec, i64 2)
The offset was not scaled by vscale:
orr x8, x8, #0x4
st1h { z0.h }, p0, [sp]
st1h { z1.d }, p1, [x8]
ld1h { z0.h }, p0/z, [sp]
And is changed to:
mov x8, sp
st1h { z0.h }, p0, [sp]
st1h { z1.d }, p1, [x8, #1, mul vl]
ld1h { z0.h }, p0/z, [sp]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111633
This patch adds patterns to match the following with INC/DEC:
- @llvm.aarch64.sve.cnt[b|h|w|d] intrinsics + ADD/SUB
- vscale + ADD/SUB
For some implementations of SVE, INC/DEC VL is not as cheap as ADD/SUB and
so this behaviour is guarded by the "use-scalar-inc-vl" feature flag, which for SVE
is off by default. There are no known issues with SVE2, so this feature is
enabled by default when targeting SVE2.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111441
We would like to start pushing -mcpu=generic towards enabling the set of
features that improves performance for some CPUs, without hurting any
others. A blend of the performance options hopefully beneficial to all
CPUs. The largest part of that is enabling in-order scheduling using the
Cortex-A55 schedule model. This is similar to the Arm backend change
from eecb353d0e25ba which made -mcpu=generic perform in-order scheduling
using the cortex-a8 schedule model.
The idea is that in-order cpu's require the most help in instruction
scheduling, whereas out-of-order cpus can for the most part out-of-order
schedule around different codegen. Our benchmarking suggests that
hypothesis holds. When running on an in-order core this improved
performance by 3.8% geomean on a set of DSP workloads, 2% geomean on
some other embedded benchmark and between 1% and 1.8% on a set of
singlecore and multicore workloads, all running on a Cortex-A55 cluster.
On an out-of-order cpu the results are a lot more noisy but show flat
performance or an improvement. On the set of DSP and embedded
benchmarks, run on a Cortex-A78 there was a very noisy 1% speed
improvement. Using the most detailed results I could find, SPEC2006 runs
on a Neoverse N1 show a small increase in instruction count (+0.127%),
but a decrease in cycle counts (-0.155%, on average). The instruction
count is very low noise, the cycle count is more noisy with a 0.15%
decrease not being significant. SPEC2k17 shows a small decrease (-0.2%)
in instruction count leading to a -0.296% decrease in cycle count. These
results are within noise margins but tend to show a small improvement in
general.
When specifying an Apple target, clang will set "-target-cpu apple-a7"
on the command line, so should not be affected by this change when
running from clang. This also doesn't enable more runtime unrolling like
-mcpu=cortex-a55 does, only changing the schedule used.
A lot of existing tests have updated. This is a summary of the important
differences:
- Most changes are the same instructions in a different order.
- Sometimes this leads to very minor inefficiencies, such as requiring
an extra mov to move variables into r0/v0 for the return value of a test
function.
- misched-fusion.ll was no longer fusing the pairs of instructions it
should, as per D110561. I've changed the schedule used in the test
for now.
- neon-mla-mls.ll now uses "mul; sub" as opposed to "neg; mla" due to
the different latencies. This seems fine to me.
- Some SVE tests do not always remove movprfx where they did before due
to different register allocation giving different destructive forms.
- The tests argument-blocks-array-of-struct.ll and arm64-windows-calls.ll
produce two LDR where they previously produced an LDP due to
store-pair-suppress kicking in.
- arm64-ldp.ll and arm64-neon-copy.ll are missing pre/postinc on LPD.
- Some tests such as arm64-neon-mul-div.ll and
ragreedy-local-interval-cost.ll have more, less or just different
spilling.
- In aarch64_generated_funcs.ll.generated.expected one part of the
function is no longer outlined. Interestingly if I switch this to use
any other scheduled even less is outlined.
Some of these are expected to happen, such as differences in outlining
or register spilling. There will be places where these result in worse
codegen, places where they are better, with the SPEC instruction counts
suggesting it is not a decrease overall, on average.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110830
This is required to codegen something like:
<vscale x 8 x i16> @llvm.experimental.vector.insert(<vscale x 8 x i16> %vec,
<vscale x 2 x i16> %subvec,
i64 %idx)
where the output vector is legal, but the input vector needs promoting.
It implements this by performing the whole operation on the promoted type,
and then truncating the result.
Reviewed By: david-arm, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110059
For vectors that are exactly equal to getMaxSVEVectorSizeInBits, just use
AArch64SVEPredPattern::all, which can enable the use of unpredicated ptrue when available.
TestPlan: check-llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108706
Add a comment when there is a shifted value,
add x9, x0, #291, lsl #12 ; =1191936
but not when the immediate value is unshifted,
subs x9, x0, #256 ; =256
when the comment adds nothing additional to the reader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107196
When clamping the index for a memory access to a stacked vector we must
take into account the entire type being accessed, not just assume that
we are accessing only a single element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105016
With regards to overrunning, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(``subvec``) - 1)
must be valid ``vec`` indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
Elements ``idx`` through (``idx`` + num_elements(result_type) - 1)
must be valid vector indices. If this condition cannot be determined
statically but is false at runtime, then the result vector is
undefined.
For the non-mixed cases (e.g. inserting/extracting a scalable into/from
another scalable, or inserting/extracting a fixed into/from another
fixed), it is possible to statically check whether or not the above
conditions are met. This was previously missing from the verifier, and
if the conditions were found to be false, the result of the
insertion/extraction would be replaced with an undef.
With regards to invalid indices, the langref (llvm/docs/LangRef.rst)
specifies:
(llvm.experimental.vector.insert)
``idx`` represents the starting element number at which ``subvec``
will be inserted. ``idx`` must be a constant multiple of
``subvec``'s known minimum vector length.
(llvm.experimental.vector.extract)
The ``idx`` specifies the starting element number within ``vec``
from which a subvector is extracted. ``idx`` must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Similarly, these conditions were not previously enforced in the
verifier. In some circumstances, invalid indices were permitted
silently, and in other circumstances, an undef was spawned where a
verifier error would have been preferred.
This commit adds verifier checks to enforce the constraints above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104468
When attempting to return something like a <vscale x 1 x i32>
type from a function we end up trying to widen the vector by
inserting a <vscale x 1 x i32> subvector into an undefined
<vscale x 4 x i32> vector. However, during legalisation we
then attempt to widen the INSERT_SUBVECTOR operands and hit
an error in WidenVectorOperand.
This patch adds a new WidenVecOp_INSERT_SUBVECTOR function
that currently only supports inserting subvectors into undefined
vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102501
A previous commit fixed some issues with inserting subvectors into
illegal scalable vectors:
0035decae7ab9ab1c988fdcede46598540afd1a0
I've created a patch that simply adds some of those same tests for SVE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100641
When trying to clamp a constant index into a scalable vector we can
test if the index is less than the minimum number of elements in the
vector. If so, we can simply return the index because we know it is
guaranteed to fit inside the vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100639
After D98856 these tests will by default break (fatal_error) if any of
the wrong interfaces are used, so there's no longer a need to have a
RUN line that checks for a warning message emitted by the compiler.
This commit adds two new intrinsics.
- llvm.experimental.vector.insert: used to insert a vector into another
vector starting at a given index.
- llvm.experimental.vector.extract: used to extract a subvector from a
larger vector starting from a given index.
The codegen work for these intrinsics has already been completed; this
commit is simply exposing the existing ISD nodes to LLVM IR.
Reviewed By: cameron.mcinally
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91362
