LLVM has a couple of ways of producing ccmp - either from chains in isel
or from a later ifcvt style pass. This adds a simple DAG combine to
capture more cases, converting and(csel(0, 1, cc0), csel(0, 1, cc1))
into a csel(ccmp(.., cc0)), depending on cc1 (a SUBS in this case).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118327
We would like to start pushing -mcpu=generic towards enabling the set of
features that improves performance for some CPUs, without hurting any
others. A blend of the performance options hopefully beneficial to all
CPUs. The largest part of that is enabling in-order scheduling using the
Cortex-A55 schedule model. This is similar to the Arm backend change
from eecb353d0e25ba which made -mcpu=generic perform in-order scheduling
using the cortex-a8 schedule model.
The idea is that in-order cpu's require the most help in instruction
scheduling, whereas out-of-order cpus can for the most part out-of-order
schedule around different codegen. Our benchmarking suggests that
hypothesis holds. When running on an in-order core this improved
performance by 3.8% geomean on a set of DSP workloads, 2% geomean on
some other embedded benchmark and between 1% and 1.8% on a set of
singlecore and multicore workloads, all running on a Cortex-A55 cluster.
On an out-of-order cpu the results are a lot more noisy but show flat
performance or an improvement. On the set of DSP and embedded
benchmarks, run on a Cortex-A78 there was a very noisy 1% speed
improvement. Using the most detailed results I could find, SPEC2006 runs
on a Neoverse N1 show a small increase in instruction count (+0.127%),
but a decrease in cycle counts (-0.155%, on average). The instruction
count is very low noise, the cycle count is more noisy with a 0.15%
decrease not being significant. SPEC2k17 shows a small decrease (-0.2%)
in instruction count leading to a -0.296% decrease in cycle count. These
results are within noise margins but tend to show a small improvement in
general.
When specifying an Apple target, clang will set "-target-cpu apple-a7"
on the command line, so should not be affected by this change when
running from clang. This also doesn't enable more runtime unrolling like
-mcpu=cortex-a55 does, only changing the schedule used.
A lot of existing tests have updated. This is a summary of the important
differences:
- Most changes are the same instructions in a different order.
- Sometimes this leads to very minor inefficiencies, such as requiring
an extra mov to move variables into r0/v0 for the return value of a test
function.
- misched-fusion.ll was no longer fusing the pairs of instructions it
should, as per D110561. I've changed the schedule used in the test
for now.
- neon-mla-mls.ll now uses "mul; sub" as opposed to "neg; mla" due to
the different latencies. This seems fine to me.
- Some SVE tests do not always remove movprfx where they did before due
to different register allocation giving different destructive forms.
- The tests argument-blocks-array-of-struct.ll and arm64-windows-calls.ll
produce two LDR where they previously produced an LDP due to
store-pair-suppress kicking in.
- arm64-ldp.ll and arm64-neon-copy.ll are missing pre/postinc on LPD.
- Some tests such as arm64-neon-mul-div.ll and
ragreedy-local-interval-cost.ll have more, less or just different
spilling.
- In aarch64_generated_funcs.ll.generated.expected one part of the
function is no longer outlined. Interestingly if I switch this to use
any other scheduled even less is outlined.
Some of these are expected to happen, such as differences in outlining
or register spilling. There will be places where these result in worse
codegen, places where they are better, with the SPEC instruction counts
suggesting it is not a decrease overall, on average.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110830
Add a comment when there is a shifted value,
add x9, x0, #291, lsl #12 ; =1191936
but not when the immediate value is unshifted,
subs x9, x0, #256 ; =256
when the comment adds nothing additional to the reader.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107196
The code previously used two BUILD_PAIRs to concatenate the two UMULO
results with 0s in the lower bits to match original VT. Then it created
an ADD and a UADDO with the original bit width. Each of those operations
need to be expanded since they have illegal types.
Since we put 0s in the lower bits before the ADD, the lower half of the
ADD result will be 0. So the lower half of the UADDO result is
solely determined by the other operand. Since the UADDO need to
be split in half, we don't really needd an operation for the lower
bits. Unfortunately, we don't see that in type legalization and end up
creating something more complicated and DAG combine or
lowering aren't always able to recover it.
This patch directly generates the narrower ADD and UADDO to avoid
needing to legalize them. Now only the MUL is done on the original
type.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97440
Even if the first computeKnownBits call doesn't have any zero
bits it is possible the other operand has bitwidth-1 leading zero.
In that case overflow is still impossible. So always call computeKnownBits
for both operands.
Using ComputeNumSignBits or computeKnownBits we might be able
to determine that overflow is impossible.
This especially helps after type legalization if the type was
promoted from a type with half the bits or more. Type legalization
conservatively creates a promoted smulo/umulo and an overflow
check for the promoted bits. The overflow from the promoted
smulo/umulo is ORed with the result of the promoted bits
overflow check. Proving that the promoted smulo/umulo can never
overflow will leave us with just the promoted bits overflow check.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97160
(CMTST A, A) will only set elements to 0 if the element is 0 in A. Use
it for != 0 compares, which currently use (vnot (CMEQz A)). This saves a
mvn instruction.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97303
vnot (xor -1) should be equivalent to the AArch64 specific AArch64ISD::NOT
node, but allow more folding thanks to all the target independent
optimizations. Specifically this allows select(icmp ne, x, y) to
become "cmeq; bsl y, x" as opposed to needing to convert the predicate
with "cmeq; mvn; bsl x, y"
Unfortunately there is a regression in a cmtst test, but the code it
selected from was already non-canonical, with instcombine preferring to
use an eq predicate instead. Plus the more common case of icmp ne is
improved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90126
Split out from D61692 per RKSimon's suggestion. Vector op
legalization will automatically recursively legalize the returned
SDValue, but we need to take care of the other results ourselves.
Otherwise it will end up getting legalized only during op
legalization, by which point it might be too late (though I'm not
aware of any specific cases right now).
There are codegen differences because expansion occurs earlier now
and we don't get a DAGCombiner run in between.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61744
llvm-svn: 360470
Summary:
When promoting the over flow vector for these ops we should use the target's desired setcc result type. This way a v8i32 result type will use a v8i32 overflow vector instead of a v8i16 overflow vector. A v8i16 overflow vector will cause LegalizeDAG/LegalizeVectorOps to have to use v8i32 and truncate to v8i16 in its expansion. By doing this in type legalization instead, we get the truncate into the DAG earlier and give DAG combine more of a chance to optimize it.
We also have to fix unrolling to use the scalar setcc result type for the scalarized operation, and convert it to the required vector element type after the scalar operation. We have to observe the vector boolean contents when doing this conversion. The previous code was just taking the scalar result and putting it in the vector. But for X86 and AArch64 that would have only put a the boolean value in bit 0 of the element and left all other bits in the element 0. We need to ensure all bits in the element are the same. I'm using a select with constants here because that's what setcc unrolling in LegalizeVectorOps used.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58567
llvm-svn: 354753
Second part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40442.
This adds an extra UnrollVectorOverflowOp() method to SDAG, because
the general UnrollOverflowOp() method can't deal with multiple results.
Additionally we need to expand UMULO/SMULO during vector op
legalization, as it may result in unrolling, which may need additional
type legalization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57997
llvm-svn: 354513
