The "not" is defined as XOR $src -1.
We need to transform this pattern to either S_NOT_B32 or V_NOT_B32_e32
dependent on the "xor" node divergence.
Reviewed By: rampitec, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115884
Using a BufferSize of one for memory ProcResources will result in better
ILP since it more accurately models the dependencies between memory ops
and their consumers on an in-order processor. After this change, the
scheduler will treat the data edges from loads as blocking so that
stalls are guaranteed when waiting for data to be retreaved from memory.
Since we don't actually track waitcnt here, this should do a better job
at modeling their behavior.
Practically, this means that the scheduler will trigger the 'STALL'
heuristic more often.
This type of change needs to be evaluated experimentally. Preliminary
results are positive.
Fixes: SWDEV-282962
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114777
Detailed description: This change enables the bit field extract patterns
selection to s_bfe_u32 or v_bfe_u32 dependent on the pattern root node
divergence.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110950
This simple heuristic uses the estimated live range length combined
with the number of registers in the class to switch which heuristic to
use. This was taking the raw number of registers in the class, even
though not all of them may be available. AMDGPU heavily relies on
dynamically reserved numbers of registers based on user attributes to
satisfy occupancy constraints, so the raw number is highly misleading.
There are still a few problems here. In the original testcase that
made me notice this, the live range size is incorrect after the
scheduler rearranges instructions, since the instructions don't have
the original InstrDist offsets. Additionally, I think it would be more
appropriate to use the number of disjointly allocatable registers in
the class. For the AMDGPU register tuples, there are a large number of
registers in each tuple class, but only a small fraction can actually
be allocated at the same time since they all overlap with each
other. It seems we do not have a query that corresponds to the number
of independently allocatable registers. Relatedly, I'm still debugging
some allocation failures where overlapping tuples seem to not be
handled correctly.
The test changes are mostly noise. There are a handful of x86 tests
that look like regressions with an additional spill, and a handful
that now avoid a spill. The worst looking regression is likely
test/Thumb2/mve-vld4.ll which introduces a few additional
spills. test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/soft-clause-exceeds-register-budget.ll
shows a massive improvement by completely eliminating a large number
of spills inside a loop.
Use GCNHazardRecognizer in postra sched.
Updated tests for the new schedules.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109536
Change-Id: Ia86ba2ae168f12fb34b4d8efdab491f84d936cde
Description: This change enables the compare operations to be selected to SALU/VALU form
dependent of the SDNode divergence flag.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106079
The requested register class priorities weren't respected
globally. Not sure why this is a target option, and not just the
expected behavior (recently added in
1a6dc92be7d68611077f0fb0b723b361817c950c). This avoids an allocation
failure when many wide tuple spills are introduced. I think this is a
workaround since I would not expect the allocation priority to be
required, and only a performance hint. The allocator should be smarter
about when only a subregister needs to be spilled and restored.
This does regress a couple of degenerate store stress lit tests which
shouldn't be too important.
This is to allow 64 bit constant rematerialization. If a constant
is split into two separate moves initializing sub0 and sub1 like
now RA cannot rematerizalize a 64 bit register.
This gives 10-20% uplift in a set of huge apps heavily using double
precession math.
Fixes: SWDEV-292645
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104874
Get rid of all fixmes and base heuristic on `num-clustered-dwords`. The main intuition behind this is as
follows. The existing heuristic roughly summarizes as below:
* Assume, all the mem ops instructions participating in the clustering process, loads/stores same num bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 4 bytes, then cluster at max 5 mem ops, that is at max 20 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 8 bytes, then cluster at max 3 mem ops, that is at max 24 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 16 bytes, then cluster at max 2 mem ops, that is at max 32 bytes
So, we need to make sure that the new heuristic do not completey deviate away from the above one, and it
properly handles both the sub-word loads and the wide loads.
Reviewed By: arsenm, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84354
tryLatency compares two sched candidates. For the top zone it prefers
the one with lesser depth, but only if that depth is greater than the
total latency of the instructions we've already scheduled -- otherwise
its latency would be hidden and there would be no stall.
Unfortunately it only tests the depth of one of the candidates. This can
lead to situations where the TopDepthReduce heuristic does not kick in,
but a lower priority heuristic chooses the other candidate, whose depth
*is* greater than the already scheduled latency, which causes a stall.
The fix is to apply the heuristic if the depth of *either* candidate is
greater than the already scheduled latency.
All this also applies to the BotHeightReduce heuristic in the bottom
zone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72392
We can produce such vectors in the Promote Alloca pass,
but we are unable to use movrel to operate it and lower
via scratch. Making it legal makes SI_INDIRECT patterns
work.
There is more work to do in subsequent changes:
1. We initialize m0 twice to access each dword. It shall
be possible to only do it once and increment base register
number instead.
2. We also need v16i64/v16f64 but these first need to be
added to tablegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79808
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
We are relying on atrificial DAG edges inserted by the
MemOpClusterMutation to keep loads and stores together in the
post-RA scheduler. This does not work all the time since it
allows to schedule a completely independent instruction in the
middle of the cluster.
Removed the DAG mutation and added pass to bundle already
clustered instructions. These bundles are unpacked before the
memory legalizer because it does not work with bundles but also
because it allows to insert waitcounts in the middle of a store
cluster.
Removing artificial edges also allows a more relaxed scheduling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72737
Summary:
- `dead-mi-elimination` assumes MIR in the SSA form and cannot be
arranged after phi elimination or DeSSA. It's enhanced to handle the
dead register definition by skipping use check on it. Once a register
def is `dead`, all its uses, if any, should be `undef`.
- Re-arrange the DIE in RA phase for AMDGPU by placing it directly after
`detect-dead-lanes`.
- Many relevant tests are refined due to different register assignment.
Reviewers: rampitec, qcolombet, sunfish
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72709
Currently the default C calling convention functions are treated
the same as compute kernels. Make this explicit so the default
calling convention can be changed to a non-kernel.
Converted with perl -pi -e 's/define void/define amdgpu_kernel void/'
on the relevant test directories (and undoing in one place that actually
wanted a non-kernel).
llvm-svn: 298444
For some reason there are both of these available, except
for scalar 64-bit compares which only has u64. I'm not sure
why there are both (I'm guessing it's for the one bit inputs we
don't use), but for consistency always using the
unsigned one.
llvm-svn: 282832
Summary:
This includes a hazard recognizer implementation to replace some of
the hazard handling we had during frame index elimination.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18602
llvm-svn: 268143
Summary:
Multi-dword constant loads generated unnecessary moves from SGPRs into VGPRs,
increasing the code size and VGPR pressure. These moves are now folded away.
Note that this lack of operand folding was not a problem for VMEM loads,
because COPY nodes from VReg_Nnn to VGPR32 are eliminated by the register
coalescer.
Some tests are updated, note that the fsub.ll test explicitly checks that
the move is elided.
With the IR generated by current Mesa, the changes are obviously relatively
minor:
7063 shaders in 3531 tests
Totals:
SGPRS: 351872 -> 352560 (0.20 %)
VGPRS: 199984 -> 200732 (0.37 %)
Code Size: 9876968 -> 9881112 (0.04 %) bytes
LDS: 91 -> 91 (0.00 %) blocks
Scratch: 1779712 -> 1767424 (-0.69 %) bytes per wave
Wait states: 295164 -> 295337 (0.06 %)
Totals from affected shaders:
SGPRS: 65784 -> 66472 (1.05 %)
VGPRS: 38064 -> 38812 (1.97 %)
Code Size: 1993828 -> 1997972 (0.21 %) bytes
LDS: 42 -> 42 (0.00 %) blocks
Scratch: 795648 -> 783360 (-1.54 %) bytes per wave
Wait states: 54026 -> 54199 (0.32 %)
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15875
llvm-svn: 257074
This reverts commit r252565.
This also includes the revert of the commit mentioned below in order to
avoid breaking tests in AMDGPU:
Revert "AMDGPU: Set isAllocatable = 0 on VS_32/VS_64"
This reverts commit r252674.
llvm-svn: 252956
Allow a target to do something other than search for copies
that will avoid cross register bank copies.
Implement for SI by only rewriting the most basic copies,
so it should look through anything like a subregister extract.
I'm not entirely satisified with this because it seems like
eliminating a reg_sequence that isn't fully used should work
generically for all targets without them having to override
something. However, it seems to be tricky to have a simple
implementation of this without rewriting to invalid kinds
of subregister copies on some targets.
I'm not sure if there is currently a generic way to easily check
if a subregister index would be valid for the current use.
The current set of TargetRegisterInfo::get*Class functions don't
quite behave like I would expect (e.g. getSubClassWithSubReg
returns the maximal register class rather than the minimal), so
I'm not sure how to make the generic test keep searching if
SrcRC:SrcSubReg is a valid replacement for DefRC:DefSubReg. Making
the default implementation to check for simple copies breaks
a variety of ARM and x86 tests by producing illegal subregister uses.
The ARM tests are not actually changed since it should still be using
the same sharesSameRegisterFile implementation, this just relaxes
them to not check for specific registers.
llvm-svn: 248478
