2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Austin Kerbow
da067ed569 [AMDGPU] Set most sched model resource's BufferSize to one
Using a BufferSize of one for memory ProcResources will result in better
ILP since it more accurately models the dependencies between memory ops
and their consumers on an in-order processor. After this change, the
scheduler will treat the data edges from loads as blocking so that
stalls are guaranteed when waiting for data to be retreaved from memory.
Since we don't actually track waitcnt here, this should do a better job
at modeling their behavior.

Practically, this means that the scheduler will trigger the 'STALL'
heuristic more often.

This type of change needs to be evaluated experimentally. Preliminary
results are positive.

Fixes: SWDEV-282962

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114777
2021-12-01 22:31:28 -08:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin
401a45c61b Fix late rematerialization operands check
D106408 enables rematerialization of instructions with virtual
register uses. That has uncovered the bug in the allUsesAvailableAt
implementation: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51516.

In the majority of cases canRematerializeAt() called to check if
an instruction can be rematerialized before the given UseIdx.
However, SplitEditor::enterIntvAtEnd() calls it to rematerialize
an instruction at the end of a block passing LIS.getMBBEndIdx()
into the check. In the testcase from the bug it has attempted to
rematerialize ADDXri after STRXui in bb.17. The use operand %55
of the ADD is killed by the STRX but that is undetected by the check
because it adjusts passed UseIdx to the reg slot, before the kill.
The value is dead at the index passed to the check however.

This change uses a later of passed UseIdx and its reg slot. This
shall be correct because if are checking an availability of operands
before an instruction that instruction cannot be the one defining
these operands. If we are checking for late rematerialization we
are really interested if operands live past the instruction.

The bug is not exploitable without D106408 but needed to reland
reverted D106408.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108475
2021-08-23 12:23:58 -07:00