This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy
bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope
the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.
Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike
now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
There are a number of MIR tests using instructions on subtargets where
they don't really exist. These are some of the easy cases that don't
require splitting up test functions.
Summary:
Moving SMRD to VMEM in SIFixSGPRCopies is rather bad for performance if
the load is really uniform. So select the scalar load intrinsics directly
to either VMEM or SMRD buffer loads based on divergence analysis.
If an offset happens to end up in a VGPR -- either because a floating
point calculation was involved, or due to other remaining deficiencies
in SIFixSGPRCopies -- we use v_readfirstlane.
There is some unrelated churn in tests since we now select MUBUF offsets
in a unified way with non-scalar buffer loads.
Change-Id: I170e6816323beb1348677b358c9d380865cd1a19
Reviewers: arsenm, alex-t, rampitec, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53283
llvm-svn: 348050
Summary:
Moving SMRD to VMEM in SIFixSGPRCopies is rather bad for performance if
the load is really uniform. So select the scalar load intrinsics directly
to either VMEM or SMRD buffer loads based on divergence analysis.
If an offset happens to end up in a VGPR -- either because a floating
point calculation was involved, or due to other remaining deficiencies
in SIFixSGPRCopies -- we use v_readfirstlane.
There is some unrelated churn in tests since we now select MUBUF offsets
in a unified way with non-scalar buffer loads.
Change-Id: I170e6816323beb1348677b358c9d380865cd1a19
Reviewers: arsenm, alex-t, rampitec, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53283
llvm-svn: 344696
