Code using indirect calls is broken without this, and there isn't
really much value in supporting the old attempt to vary the argument
placement based on uses. This resulted in more argument shuffling code
anyway.
Also have the option stop implying all inputs need to be passed. This
will no rely on the amdgpu-no-* attributes to avoid passing
unnecessary values.
(i8 X ^ 128) & (i8 X s>> 7) --> usubsat X, 128
As suggested in D112085, we can substitute 'xor' with 'add'
in this pattern, and it is logically equivalent:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/eJtWWC
We canonicalize to 'xor' in IR, but SDAG does not do that
(and it probably should not - https://llvm.org/PR52267 ), so
it is possible to see either pattern in codegen. Note that
'sub' is a another potential pattern, but that is
canonicalized to 'add' in DAGCombiner, so we don't need to
worry about that variation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112377
(i8 X ^ 128) & (i8 X s>> 7) --> usubsat X, 128
I haven't found a generalization of this identity:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_sriEQ
Note: I was actually looking at the first form of the pattern in that link,
but that's part of a long chain of potential missed transforms in codegen
and IR....that I hope ends here!
The predicates for when this is profitable are a bit tricky. This version of
the patch excludes multi-use but includes custom lowering (as opposed to
legal only).
On x86 for example, we have custom lowering for some vector types, and that
uses umax and sub. So to enable that fold, we need add use checks to avoid
regressions. Even with legal-only lowering, we could see code with extra
reg move instructions for extra uses, so that constraint would have to be
eased very carefully to avoid penalties.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112085
Use GCNHazardRecognizer in postra sched.
Updated tests for the new schedules.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109536
Change-Id: Ia86ba2ae168f12fb34b4d8efdab491f84d936cde
These used to consistently be zeroed pre-gfx9, but gfx9 made the
situation complicated since now some still do and some don't. This
also manages to pick up a few cases that the pattern fails to optimize
away.
We handle some cases with instruction patterns, but some get
through. In particular this improves the integer cases.
The result of ISD::USUBSAT will never be larger than the LHS. We
can use this to put a bound on the number of leading zeros.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98133
As discussed on D96413, as long as the promoted bits of the args are zero we can use the basic ISD::USUBSAT pattern directly, without the shifting like we do for other ops.
I think something similar should be possible for ISD::UADDSAT as well, which I'll look at later.
Also, create a ISD::USUBSAT node directly - this will be expanded back by the legalizer later on if necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96622
Begin transitioning the X86 vector code to recognise sub(umax(a,b) ,b) or sub(a,umin(a,b)) USUBSAT patterns to make it more generic and available to all targets.
This initial patch just moves the basic umin/umax patterns to DAG, removing some vector-only checks on the way - these are some of the patterns that the legalizer will try to expand back to so we can be reasonably relaxed about matching these pre-legalization.
We can handle the trunc(sub(..))) variants as well, which helps with patterns where we were promoting to a wider type to detect overflow/saturation.
The remaining x86 code requires some cleanup first - some of it isn't actually tested etc. I also need to resurrect D25987.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96413
