6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark Murray
3d7662142d [ARM] Undeprecate complex IT blocks
AArch32/Armv8A  introduced the performance deprecation of certain patterns
of IT instructions.  After some debate internal to ARM, this is now being
reverted; i.e. no IT instruction patterns are performance deprecated
anymore, as the perfomance degredation is not significant enough.

This reverts the following:

"ARMv8-A deprecates some uses of the T32 IT instruction. All uses of
IT that apply to instructions other than a single subsequent 16-bit
instruction from a restricted set are deprecated, as are explicit
references to the PC within that single 16-bit instruction. This permits
the non-deprecated forms of IT and subsequent instructions to be treated
as a single 32-bit conditional instruction."

The deprecation no longer applies, but the behaviour may be controlled
by the -arm-restrict-it and -arm-no-restrict-it command-line options,
with the latter being the default. No warnings about complex IT blocks
will be generated.

Reviewed By: dmgreen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118044
2022-02-07 15:47:53 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
fae05692a3 CodeGen: Print/parse LLTs in MachineMemOperands
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).

Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.

This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
2021-06-30 16:54:13 -04:00
Sam Parker
a3e41d4581 [ARM] Make MachineVerifier more strict about terminators
Fix the ARM backend's analyzeBranch so it doesn't ignore predicated
return instructions, and make the MachineVerifier rule more strict.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40061
2020-08-27 07:10:20 +01:00
Sam Parker
4f9f4b21e0 [ARM] Unrestrict Armv8-a IT when at minsize
IT blocks with more than one instruction were performance deprecated in Armv8
but that doesn't mean we should follow that advise when optimising for size.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85638
2020-08-10 14:59:53 +01:00
Sjoerd Meijer
7efabe5c7d [MIR][ARM] MachineOperand comments
This adds infrastructure to print and parse MIR MachineOperand comments.
The motivation for the ARM backend is to print condition code names instead of
magic constants that are difficult to read (for human beings). For example,
instead of this:

  dead renamable $r2, $cpsr = tEOR killed renamable $r2, renamable $r1, 14, $noreg
  t2Bcc %bb.4, 0, killed $cpsr

we now print this:

  dead renamable $r2, $cpsr = tEOR killed renamable $r2, renamable $r1, 14 /* CC::always */, $noreg
  t2Bcc %bb.4, 0 /* CC:eq */, killed $cpsr

This shows that MachineOperand comments are enclosed between /* and */. In this
example, the EOR instruction is not conditionally executed (i.e. it is "always
executed"), which is encoded by the 14 immediate machine operand. Thus, now
this machine operand has /* CC::always */ as a comment. The 0 on the next
conditional branch instruction represents the equal condition code, thus now
this operand has /* CC:eq */ as a comment.

As it is a comment, the MI lexer/parser completely ignores it. The benefit is
that this keeps the change in the lexer extremely minimal and no target
specific parsing needs to be done. The changes on the MIPrinter side are also
minimal, as there is only one target hooks that is used to create the machine
operand comments.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74306
2020-02-24 14:19:21 +00:00
Sam Parker
e014de3a16 [NFC][ARM] Add test 2020-01-31 10:32:15 +00:00