I noticed that we were not folding expressions like this:
icmp ult (constexpr), null
in https://llvm.org/PR49355, so we end up with extremely large
icmp instructions as the constant expressions pile up on each other.
There is no potential to mis-fold an unsigned boundary condition
with a zero/null, so this is just falling through a crack in the
pattern matching.
The more general case of comparisons of non-zero constants and
constexpr are more tricky and may require the datalayout to know
how to cast to different types, etc. Negative tests verify that
we are only changing a subset of potential patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98150
When collecting `i1` values via `findAllDefs`, ignore Constant's
operands, since Constant's operands might not be `i1`.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46923 which causes ICE
```
llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/Constants.cpp:1924: static llvm::Constant *llvm::ConstantExpr::getZExt(llvm::Constant *, llvm::Type *, bool): Assertion `C->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits() < Ty->getScalarSizeInBits()&& "SrcTy must be smaller than DestTy for ZExt!"' failed.
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85007
