4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Arsenault
fae05692a3 CodeGen: Print/parse LLTs in MachineMemOperands
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).

Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.

This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
2021-06-30 16:54:13 -04:00
Guillaume Chatelet
48904e9452 [Alignment] Use llvm::Align in MachineFunction and TargetLowering - fixes mir parsing
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,

This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433

llvm-svn: 371608
2019-09-11 11:16:48 +00:00
Jason Liu
8dd563ef4b [NFC][PowerPC]Change ADDIStocHA to ADDIStocHA8 to follow 64-bit naming convention
Summary:

Since we are planning to add ADDIStocHA for 32bit in later patch, we decided
 to change 64bit one first to follow naming convention with 8 behind opcode.

Patch by: Xiangling_L

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64814

llvm-svn: 366731
2019-07-22 19:55:33 +00:00
Stefan Pintilie
522307fa40 [PowerPC] Remove CRBits Copy Of Unset/set CBit
For the situation, where we generate the following code:

       crxor 8, 8, 8
       < Some instructions>
.LBB0_1:
       < Some instructions>
       cror 1, 8, 8

cror (COPY of CRbit) depends on the result of the crxor instruction.
CR8 is known to be zero as crxor is equivalent to CRUNSET. We can simply use
crxor 1, 1, 1 instead to zero out CR1, which does not have any dependency on
any previous instruction.

This patch will optimize it to:

        < Some instructions>
.LBB0_1:
        < Some instructions>
        cror 1, 1, 1

Patch By: Victor Huang (NeHuang)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62044

llvm-svn: 361632
2019-05-24 12:05:37 +00:00