16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev
0aef747b84
[NFC][X86][Codegen] Megacommit: mass-regenerate all check lines that were already autogenerated
The motivation is that the update script has at least two deviations
(`<...>@GOT`/`<...>@PLT`/ and not hiding pointer arithmetics) from
what pretty much all the checklines were generated with,
and most of the tests are still not updated, so each time one of the
non-up-to-date tests is updated to see the effect of the code change,
there is a lot of noise. Instead of having to deal with that each
time, let's just deal with everything at once.

This has been done via:
```
cd llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86
grep -rl "; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py" | xargs -L1 <...>/llvm-project/llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py --llc-binary <...>/llvm-project/build/bin/llc
```

Not all tests were regenerated, however.
2021-06-11 23:57:02 +03:00
Fangrui Song
488f1c4893 [X86][test] Add a regression test for lock cmpxchg16b on a global variable with offset
Add a test for a bug (uncovered by D88808) fixed by f34bb06935aa3bab353d70d515b767fdd2f5625c.
Also delete cmpxchg16b.ll which is covered by atomic128.ll

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89163
2020-10-09 15:44:32 -07:00
Craig Topper
514b00c439 [X86] Limit the scope of the min/max canonicalization in combineSelect
Previously the transform was doing these two canonicalizations
(x > y) ? x : y -> (x >= y) ? x : y
(x < y) ? x : y -> (x <= y) ? x : y

But those don't seem to be useful generally. And they actively
pessimize the cases in PR47049.

This patch limits it to
(x > 0) ? x : 0 -> (x >= 0) ? x : 0
(x < -1) ? x : -1 -> (x <= -1) ? x : -1

These are the cases mentioned in the comments as the motivation
for the canonicalization. These allow the CMOV to use the S
flag from the compare thus improving opportunities to use a TEST
or the flags from an arithmetic instruction.
2020-08-07 22:51:49 -07:00
Craig Topper
84abec2855 [X86] Check for 64-bit mode in X86Subtarget::hasCmpxchg16b()
The feature flag alone can't be trusted since it can be passed via -mattr. Need to ensure 64-bit mode as well.

We had a 64 bit mode check on the instruction to make the assembler work correctly. But we weren't guarding any of our lowering code or the hooks for the AtomicExpandPass.

I've added 32-bit command lines to atomic128.ll with and without cx16. The tests there would all previously fail if -mattr=cx16 was passed to them. I had to move one test case for f128 to a new file as it seems to have a different 32-bit mode or possibly sse issue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59308

llvm-svn: 356078
2019-03-13 18:48:50 +00:00
Matt Arsenault
0cb08e448a Allow FP types for atomicrmw xchg
llvm-svn: 351427
2019-01-17 10:49:01 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
2d0f20cc04 [X86] Handle COPYs of physregs better (regalloc hints)
Enable enableMultipleCopyHints() on X86.

Original Patch by @jonpa:

While enabling the mischeduler for SystemZ, it was discovered that for some reason a test needed one extra seemingly needless COPY (test/CodeGen/SystemZ/call-03.ll). The handling for that is resulted in this patch, which improves the register coalescing by providing not just one copy hint, but a sorted list of copy hints. On SystemZ, this gives ~12500 less register moves on SPEC, as well as marginally less spilling.

Instead of improving just the SystemZ backend, the improvement has been implemented in common-code (calculateSpillWeightAndHint(). This gives a lot of test failures, but since this should be a general improvement I hope that the involved targets will help and review the test updates.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128

llvm-svn: 342578
2018-09-19 18:59:08 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih
25528d6de7 [CodeGen] Unify MBB reference format in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.

The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422

llvm-svn: 319665
2017-12-04 17:18:51 +00:00
Reid Kleckner
ab23dace56 [MC] Suppress .Lcfi labels when emitting textual assembly
Summary:
This suppresses the generation of .Lcfi labels in our textual assembler.
It was annoying that this generated cascading .Lcfi labels:
  llc foo.ll -o - | llvm-mc | llvm-mc

After three trips through MCAsmStreamer, we'd have three labels in the
output when none are necessary. We should only bother creating the
labels and frame data when making a real object file.

This supercedes D38605, which moved the entire .seh_ implementation into
MCObjectStreamer.

This has the advantage that we do more checking when emitting textual
assembly, as a minor efficiency cost. Outputting textual assembly is not
performance critical, so this shouldn't matter.

Reviewers: majnemer, MatzeB

Subscribers: qcolombet, nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38638

llvm-svn: 315259
2017-10-10 00:57:36 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
8ac488b161 [x86] Fix an amazing goof in the handling of sub, or, and xor lowering.
The comment for this code indicated that it should work similar to our
handling of add lowering above: if we see uses of an instruction other
than flag usage and store usage, it tries to avoid the specialized
X86ISD::* nodes that are designed for flag+op modeling and emits an
explicit test.

Problem is, only the add case actually did this. In all the other cases,
the logic was incomplete and inverted. Any time the value was used by
a store, we bailed on the specialized X86ISD node. All of this appears
to have been historical where we had different logic here. =/

Turns out, we have quite a few patterns designed around these nodes. We
should actually form them. I fixed the code to match what we do for add,
and it has quite a positive effect just within some of our test cases.
The only thing close to a regression I see is using:

  notl %r
  testl %r, %r

instead of:

  xorl -1, %r

But we can add a pattern or something to fold that back out. The
improvements seem more than worth this.

I've also worked with Craig to update the comments to no longer be
actively contradicted by the code. =[ Some of this still remains
a mystery to both Craig and myself, but this seems like a large step in
the direction of consistency and slightly more accurate comments.

Many thanks to Craig for help figuring out this nasty stuff.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37096

llvm-svn: 311737
2017-08-25 00:34:07 +00:00
Amjad Aboud
4563c062b1 [X86] X86::CMOV to Branch heuristic based optimization.
LLVM compiler recognizes opportunities to transform a branch into IR select instruction(s) - later it will be lowered into X86::CMOV instruction, assuming no other optimization eliminated the SelectInst.
However, it is not always profitable to emit X86::CMOV instruction. For example, branch is preferable over an X86::CMOV instruction when:
1. Branch is well predicted
2. Condition operand is expensive, compared to True-value and the False-value operands

In CodeGenPrepare pass there is a shallow optimization that tries to convert SelectInst into branch, but it is not enough.
This commit, implements machine optimization pass that converts X86::CMOV instruction(s) into branch, based on a conservative heuristic.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34769

llvm-svn: 308142
2017-07-16 17:39:56 +00:00
Amaury Sechet
42fb927438 Regen expected tests result. NFC
llvm-svn: 294866
2017-02-11 19:27:15 +00:00
Quentin Colombet
cf9732b417 [X86] Make sure we do not clobber RBX with cmpxchg when used as a base pointer.
cmpxchg[8|16]b uses RBX as one of its argument.
In other words, using this instruction clobbers RBX as it is defined to hold one
the input. When the backend uses dynamically allocated stack, RBX is used as a
reserved register for the base pointer. 

Reserved registers have special semantic that only the target understands and
enforces, because of that, the register allocator don’t use them, but also,
don’t try to make sure they are used properly (remember it does not know how
they are supposed to be used).

Therefore, when RBX is used as a reserved register but defined by something that
is not compatible with that use, the register allocator will not fix the
surrounding code to make sure it gets saved and restored properly around the
broken code. This is the responsibility of the target to do the right thing with
its reserved register.

To fix that, when the base pointer needs to be preserved, we use a different
pseudo instruction for cmpxchg that save rbx.
That pseudo takes two more arguments than the regular instruction:
- One is the value to be copied into RBX to set the proper value for the
  comparison.
- The other is the virtual register holding the save of the value of RBX as the
  base pointer. This saving is done as part of isel (i.e., we emit a copy from
  rbx).

cmpxchg_save_rbx <regular cmpxchg args>, input_for_rbx_reg, save_of_rbx_as_bp

This gets expanded into:
rbx = copy input_for_rbx_reg
cmpxchg <regular cmpxchg args>
rbx = save_of_rbx_as_bp

Note: The actual modeling of the pseudo is a bit more complicated to make sure
the interferes that appears after the pseudo gets expanded are properly modeled
before that expansion.

This fixes PR26883.

llvm-svn: 263325
2016-03-12 02:25:27 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
dcc2500452 X86: More efficient legalization of wide integer compares
In particular, this makes the code for 64-bit compares on 32-bit targets
much more efficient.

Example:

  define i32 @test_slt(i64 %a, i64 %b) {
  entry:
    %cmp = icmp slt i64 %a, %b
    br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
  bb1:
    ret i32 1
  bb2:
    ret i32 2
  }

Before this patch:

  test_slt:
          movl    4(%esp), %eax
          movl    8(%esp), %ecx
          cmpl    12(%esp), %eax
          setae   %al
          cmpl    16(%esp), %ecx
          setge   %cl
          je      .LBB2_2
          movb    %cl, %al
  .LBB2_2:
          testb   %al, %al
          jne     .LBB2_4
          movl    $1, %eax
          retl
  .LBB2_4:
          movl    $2, %eax
          retl

After this patch:

  test_slt:
          movl    4(%esp), %eax
          movl    8(%esp), %ecx
          cmpl    12(%esp), %eax
          sbbl    16(%esp), %ecx
          jge     .LBB1_2
          movl    $1, %eax
          retl
  .LBB1_2:
          movl    $2, %eax
          retl

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14496

llvm-svn: 253572
2015-11-19 16:35:08 +00:00
David Blaikie
a79ac14fa6 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
Tim Northover
6c647eae8b X86: remove temporary atomicrmw used during lowering.
We construct a temporary "atomicrmw xchg" instruction when lowering atomic
stores for widths that aren't supported natively. This isn't on the top-level
worklist though, so it won't be removed automatically and we have to do it
ourselves once that itself has been lowered.

Thanks Saleem for pointing this out!

llvm-svn: 212948
2014-07-14 15:31:13 +00:00
Tim Northover
277066ab43 X86: expand atomics in IR instead of as MachineInstrs.
The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in
terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It
also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help
out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible
instructions..

rdar://problem/13496295

llvm-svn: 212119
2014-07-01 18:53:31 +00:00