I had manually removed unused prefixes from CodeGen/X86 directory for more than 100 tests.
I checked the change history for each of them at the beginning, and then I mainly focused on the format since I found all of the unused prefixes were result from either insensible copy or residuum after functional update.
I think it's OK to remove the remaining X86 tests by script now. I wrote a rough script which works for me in most tests. I put it in llvm/utils temporarily for review and hope it may help other components owners.
The tests in this patch are all generated by the tool and checked by update tool for the autogenerated tests. I skimmed them and checked about 30 tests and didn't find any unexpected changes.
Reviewed By: mtrofin, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91496
The initial attempt (rG89633320) botched the logic by reversing
the source/dest types. Added x86 tests for additional coverage.
The vector tests show a potential improvement (fold vector load
instead of broadcasting), but that's a known/existing problem.
This fold is done in IR by instcombine, and we have a special
form of it already here in DAGCombiner, but we want the more
general transform too:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3jZm
Name: general
Pre: (C1 + zext(C2) < 64)
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%a = and i64 %s2, zext((1 << (16 - C2)) - 1)
%r = trunc %a to i16
Name: special
Pre: C1 == 48
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%r = trunc %s2 to i16
...because D58017 exposes a regression without this fold.
Summary:
This *might* be the last fold for `sink-addsub-of-const.ll`, but i'm not sure yet.
As far as i can tell, there are no regressions here (ignoring x86-32),
all changes are either good or neutral.
This, almost surprisingly to me, fixes the motivational tests (in `shift-amount-mod.ll`)
`@reg32_lshr_by_sub_from_negated` from [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/vMd3
Reviewers: RKSimon, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: sdardis, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62774
llvm-svn: 362488
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 362142
I was looking into an endless combine loop the uncommitted follow-up patch
was causing, and it appears even these patches can exibit such an
endless loop. The root cause is that we try to hoist one binop (add/sub) with
constant operand, and if we get two such binops both of which are
eligible for this hoisting, we get stuck.
Some cases may highlight missing constant-folds.
Reverts r361871,r361872,r361873,r361874.
llvm-svn: 362109
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 361871
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 361852
Meaning if we were to produce 'neg' in dagcombine, we will get an
endless cycle; some inverse transform would need to be guarded somehow.
Also, the 'and (sub 0, x), 31' variant is sticky,
doesn't get optimized in any way.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952
llvm-svn: 361254
