With opaque pointers, we can eliminate zero-index GEPs even if
they have multiple indices, as this no longer impacts the result
type of the GEP.
This optimization is already done for instructions in InstSimplify,
but we were missing the corresponding constant expression handling.
The constexpr transform is a bit more powerful, because it can
produce a vector splat constant and also handles undef values --
it is an extension of an existing single-index transform.
If both the character and string are known, but the length
potentially isn't, we can optimize the memchr() call to a select
of either the known position of the character or null.
Split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D122836.
If the memchr() size is 1, then we can convert the call into a
single-byte comparison. This works even if both the string and the
character are unknown.
Split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D122836.
As discussed on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54682,
MemorySSA currently has a bug when computing the clobber of calls
that access loop-varying locations. I think a "proper" fix for this
on the MemorySSA side might be non-trivial, but we can easily work
around this in MemCpyOpt:
Currently, MemCpyOpt uses a location-less getClobberingMemoryAccess()
call to find a clobber on either the src or dest location, and then
refines it for the src and dest clobber. This was intended as an
optimization, as the location-less API is cached, while the
location-affected APIs are not.
However, I don't think this really makes a difference in practice,
because I don't think anything will use the cached clobbers on
those calls later anyway. On CTMark, this patch seems to be very
mildly positive actually.
So I think this is a reasonable way to avoid the problem for now,
though MemorySSA should also get a fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122911
The range calculation in walkForwards() assumes that the ranges of
the operands have already been calculated. With the used visit
order, this is not necessarily the case when there are multiple
roots. (There is nothing guaranteeing that instructions are visited
in topological order.)
Fix this by queuing instructions for reprocessing if the operand
ranges haven't been calculated yet.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54669.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122817
Prior to this change, CallBase::hasFnAttr checked the called function to
see if it had an attribute if it wasn't set on the CallBase, but
getFnAttr didn't do the same delegation, which led to very confusing
behavior. This patch fixes the issue by making CallBase::getFnAttr also
check the function under the same circumstances.
Test changes look (to me) like they're cleaning up redundant attributes
which no longer get specified both on the callee and call. We also clean
up the one ad-hoc implementation of this getter over in InlineCost.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122821
This change was previously reverted because I forgot rerunning
update_test_checks.py and tests were not actually baseline.
Extracted from: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122757
This is a hacky fix for:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54558
As discussed there, codegen regressed when we opened up this transform
to allow extra uses ( 61580d0949fd3465 ), and it's not clear how to
undo the transforms at the later stage of compilation.
As noted in the code comments, there's a set of remaining folds that
are still limited to one-use, so we can try harder to refine and
expand the limitations on these folds, but it's likely to be an
up-and-down battle as we find and overcome similar regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122909
This is a retry of 9397bdc67eb2 - that was reverted until
we had a clang warning in place to alert users about a
possible mistake in source. The warning was added with
ab982eace6e4.
This is noted as a missing clang warning in #54222,
but it is also a missing optimization opportunity.
Alive2 proofs:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Q8drDqhttps://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/pE6LRt
I don't see a single conversion for all predicates
using "getFCmpCode" logic, so other predicates are
left as a TODO item.
These two are equivalent,
and i *think* the `and` form is more-ish canonical.
General proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/RrF5s6
If constant on the (outer) `xor` is an `undef`,
the whole lane is dead: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mu4Sh2
However, if the constant on the (inner) `or` is an `undef`,
we must sanitize it first: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MHYJL7
I guess, producing a zero `and`-mask is optimal in that case.
alive-tv is happy about the entirety of `xor-of-or.ll`.
During skeleton construction for the epilogue vector loop, generic
helpers use getOrCreateTripCount, which will re-expand the trip count
computation. Instead, re-use the TripCount created during main loop
vectorization.
If the frame pointer is an argument of the original pointer (which
happens with opaque pointers), then we currently first replace the
argument with undef, which will prevent later replacement of the
old frame pointer with the new one.
Fix this by replacing arguments with some dummy instructions first,
and then replacing those with undef later. This gives us a chance
to replace the frame pointer before it becomes undef.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54523.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122375
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
According to the current design, if a floating point operation is
represented by a constrained intrinsic somewhere in a function, all
floating point operations in the function must be represented by
constrained intrinsics. It imposes additional requirements to inlining
mechanism. If non-strictfp function is inlined into strictfp function,
all ordinary FP operations must be replaced with their constrained
counterparts.
Inlining strictfp function into non-strictfp is not implemented as it
would require replacement of all FP operations in the host function,
which now is undesirable due to expected performance loss.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69798
This fixes a TODO in constantArgPropagation() to make it feature complete.
However, I do find myself in agreement with the review comments in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106426. I don't think we should pursue
specializing such recursive functions as the code size increase becomes
linear to 'max-iters'. Compiling the modified test just with -O3 (no
function specialization) generates the same code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122755
When MaximizeVectorBandwidth is enabled, we can end up (via calls to
collectUniformsAndScalars/setCostBasedWideningDecision through
calculateRegisterUsage) making widening decisions before we have decided
whether to fold the tail by masking. These decisions will be wrong if we
later decided to fold the tail, for example when the trip count is very
low. It will use incorrect costs for loads that should get masked, using
standard memory operation costs instead.
This still at the moment uses the EmulatedMaskMemRefHack costs (a bit
unfortunately), but the old costs without this change were 1, leading to
too optimistic vectorization.
This slightly changes the way that the MaximizeVectorBandwidth option
works to make it easier to test, always honouring the option if it is
set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120215
According to the LLVM debug info update guide: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToUpdateDebugInfo.html,
"Hoisting identical instructions which appear in several successor
blocks into a predecessor block. In this case there is no single
merged instruction. The rule for dropping locations applies".
Thanks to Yuanbo Li for reporting this.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Reviewers: sebpop, tejohnson, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122730
Factor in the TBAA of adjacent stores instead of just the head store
when merging stores into a memset. We were seeing GVN remove a load that
had a TBAA that matched the 2nd store because GVN determined it didn't
match the TBAA of the memset. The memset had the TBAA of only the first
store.
i.e. Loading the field pi_ of shared_count after memset to create an
array of shared_ptr
template<class T>
class shared_ptr {
T *p;
shared_count refcount;
};
class shared_count {
sp_counted_base *pi_;
};
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122205
Avoids merge errors when opaque pointers are loaded into different types.
Reviewed by: jcranmer-intel, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122521
In some case, like in the added test case, we can reach
selectInterleaveCount with loops that actually have a cost of 0.
Unfortunately a loop cost of 0 is also used to communicate that the cost
has not been computed yet. To resolve the crash, bail out if the cost
remains zero after computing it.
This seems like the best option, as there are multiple code paths that
return a cost of 0 to force a computation in selectInterleaveCount.
Computing the cost at multiple places up front there would unnecessarily
complicate the logic.
Fixes#54413.
According to definition of canonical form, it is a canonical
if scale reg does not contain addrec for loop L then none of bases
should contain addrec for this loop.
The critical word here is "contains".
Current checker of canonical form checks not "containing" property
but "is". So it does not check whether it contains but whether it is.
Fix the checker and canonicalizing utility to follow definition.
Without this fix in the test attached the base formula looking as
reg((-1 * {0,+,8}<nuw><nsw><%bb2>)<nsw>) + 1*reg((8 * (%arg /u 8))<nuw>)
is considered as conanocial while base contains an addrec.
And modified formula we want to insert
reg({0,+,8}<nuw><nsw><%bb2>) + 1*reg((-8 * (%arg /u 8)))
is considered as not canonical.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122457
