10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Doerfert
a81fff8afd Reapply "[Intrinsics] Add nocallback to the default intrinsic attributes"
This reverts commit c5f789050daab25aad6770790987e2b7c0395936 and
reapplies 7aea3ea8c3b33c9bb338d5d6c0e4832be1d09ac3 with additional test
changes.
2022-03-25 09:36:50 -05:00
Johannes Doerfert
c5f789050d Revert "[Intrinsics] Add nocallback to the default intrinsic attributes"
This reverts commit 7aea3ea8c3b33c9bb338d5d6c0e4832be1d09ac3 as it
breaks the buildbots.

I didn't see these failures in the pre-merge checks, looking into it.
2022-03-24 14:04:41 -05:00
Johannes Doerfert
7aea3ea8c3 [Intrinsics] Add nocallback to the default intrinsic attributes
Most intrinsics, especially "default" ones, will not call back into the
IR module. `nocallback` encodes this nicely. As it was not used before,
this patch also makes use of `nocallback` in the Attributor which
results in many more `norecurse` deductions.

Tablegen part is mechanical, test updates by script.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118680
2022-03-24 13:50:54 -05:00
Johannes Doerfert
f3ad8cf00e [Attributor] Cleanup manifest and liveness for CGSCC passes
There was some ad-hoc handling of liveness and manifest to avoid
breaking CGSCC guarantees. Things always slipped through though.
This cleanup will:

1) Prevent us from manifesting any "information" outside the CGSCC.
   This might be too conservative but we need to opt-in to annotation
   not try to avoid some problematic ones.
2) Avoid running any liveness analysis outside the CGSCC. We did have
   some AAIsDeadFunction handling to this end but we need this for all
   AAIsDead classes. The reason is that AAIsDead information is only
   correct if we actually manifest it, since we don't (see point 1) we
   cannot actually derive/use it at all. We are currently trying to
   avoid running any AA updates outside the CGSCC but that seems to
   impact things quite a bit.
3) Assert, don't check, that our modifications (during cleanup) modifies
   only CGSCC functions.
2022-03-11 16:46:02 -06:00
Johannes Doerfert
b51b83f68e [Attributor] Introduce the concept of query AAs
D106720 introduced features that did not work properly as we could add
new queries after a fixpoint was reached and which could not be answered
by the information gathered up to the fixpoint alone.

As an alternative to D110078, which forced eager computation where we
want to continue to be lazy, this patch fixes the problem.

QueryAAs are AAs that allow lazy queries during their lifetime. They are
never fixed if they have no outstanding dependences and always run as
part of the updates in an iteration. To determine if we are done, all
query AAs are asked if they received new queries, if not, we only need
to consider updated AAs, as before. If new queries are present we go for
another iteration.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118669
2022-02-01 01:40:44 -06:00
Johannes Doerfert
ac3ec22df9 [Attributor] Use AAFunctionReachability to determine AANoRecurse
We missed out on AANoRecurse in the module pass because we had no call
graph. With AAFunctionReachability we can simply ask if the function may
reach itself.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110099
2022-02-01 01:40:44 -06:00
Johannes Doerfert
d1186ce7a9 [Attributor] Make interprocedural value explicit in genericValueTraversal
genericValueTraversal can look through arguments and allow value
simplification across function boundaries. In fact, the latter already
happened unchecked. With this change we allow the user of
genericValueTraversal to opt-out of interprocedural traversal if
required. We explicitly look through arguments now which helps to do
various things, incl. the propagation of constants into OpenMP parallel
regions (on the host).
2022-02-01 01:40:44 -06:00
Johannes Doerfert
a1db0e523d [Attributor][FIX] Liveness handling in the isAssumedDead helpers
This fixes a conceptual problem with our AAIsDead usage which conflated
call site liveness with call site return value liveness. Without the
fix tests would obviously miscompile as we make genericValueTraversal
more powerful (in a follow up). The effects on the tests are mixed but
mostly marginal. The most prominent one is the lack of `noreturn` for
functions. The reason is that we make entire blocks live at the same
time (for time reasons). Now that we actually look at the block
liveness, which we need to do, the return instructions are live and
will survive. As an example,  `noreturn_async.ll` has been modified
to retain the `noreturn` even with block granularity. We could address
this easily but there is little need in practice.
2022-02-01 01:18:52 -06:00
Johannes Doerfert
acf3093117 [Attributor][FIX] Do not ignore memory writes in AAMemoryBehavior
Even if we look for `nocapture` we need to bail on escaping pointers.
The crucial thing is that we might not look at a big enough scope when
we derive the memory behavior. Thus, it might be `nocapture` in a larger
context while it is "captured" in a smaller context.
2021-10-27 21:04:32 -05:00
Johannes Doerfert
172078729f [Attributor][NFX] Pre-commit test case exposing a problem
The test case is the IR of:

```
  void func(float * restrict a, float *b, int N) {
    N = 199;
    #pragma omp parallel for
    for (int i = 1; i < N; i++)
      a[i] = b[i] + 1.0;
  }
```
2021-10-27 21:04:31 -05:00