6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bjorn Pettersson
b280ee1dd7 [test] Use -passes=instsimplify instead of -instsimplify in a number of tests. NFC
Another step moving away from the deprecated syntax of specifying
pass pipeline in opt.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119080
2022-02-07 14:26:58 +01:00
Sanjay Patel
b326c05814 [InstSimplify] fold xor logic of 2 variables, part 2
(~a & b) ^ (a | b) --> a

This is the swapped and/or (Demorgan?) sibling fold for
the fold added with D114462 ( 892648b18a8c ).

This case is easier to specify because we are returning
a root value, not a 'not':
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/SRzj4f
2021-11-24 08:15:47 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
823fc8aa06 [InstSimplify] add tests for xor logic; NFC 2021-11-24 08:15:47 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
892648b18a [InstSimplify] fold xor logic of 2 variables
(a & b) ^ (~a | b) --> ~a

I was looking for a shortcut to reduce some of the complex logic
folds that are currently up for review (D113216
and others in that stack), and I found this missing from
instcombine/instsimplify.

There is a trade-off in putting it into instsimplify: because
we can't create new values here, we need a strict 'not' op (no
undef elements). Otherwise, the fold is not valid:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/k_AGGj

If this was in instcombine instead, we could create the proper
'not'. But having the fold here benefits other passes like GVN
that use instsimplify as an analysis.

There is a related fold where 'and' and 'or' are swapped, and
that is planned as a follow-up commit.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114462
2021-11-23 16:50:23 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
14d743457c [InstSimplify] add tests for xor logic fold; NFC 2021-11-23 15:35:52 -05:00
Juneyoung Lee
864dda5fd5 [InstSimplify] Add tests that fold instructions with poison operands (NFC) 2020-12-02 01:01:59 +09:00