This patch is a follow-up to D115953. It updates optimizeInductions
to also introduce new VPScalarIVStepsRecipes if an IV has both vector
and scalar uses.
It updates all uses that only need scalar values to use the newly
created recipe for the scalar steps.
This completes untangling of VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe
code-generation. Now the recipe *only* creates the widened vector
values, as it says on the tin.
The code to genereate IR has been moved directly to
VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe::execute.
Note that the recipe has been updated to hold a reference to
ScalarEvolution, which is needed to expand the step, until we can place
the corresponding SCEV expansion in the pre-header.
Depends on D120827.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120828
This reverts the revert commit ff93260bf6bddfbad1fa65c4d5184988885b900f.
The underlying issue causing the PPC bot failures has been fixed in
cbaac1473403 and a corresponding test case has been added in
ad2cad1c521c.
Original message:
This patch adds a new VPScalarIVStepsRecipe to handle building scalar
steps.
In the first patch, it only handles the case where there is no vector
induction variable needed.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115953
This patch adds a new VPScalarIVStepsRecipe to handle building scalar
steps.
In the first patch, it only handles the case where there is no vector
induction variable needed.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115953
The modified tests didn't have actual users of all inductions, making it
trivial to eliminate them. Add users to make sure the inductions are
actually used in the vectorized version.
This patch marks the induction increment of the main induction variable
of the vector loop as NUW when not folding the tail.
If the tail is not folded, we know that End - Start >= Step (either
statically or through the minimum iteration checks). We also know that both
Start % Step == 0 and End % Step == 0. We exit the vector loop if %IV +
%Step == %End. Hence we must exit the loop before %IV + %Step unsigned
overflows and we can mark the induction increment as NUW.
This should make SCEV return more precise bounds for the created vector
loops, used by later optimizations, like late unrolling.
At the moment quite a few tests still need to be updated, but before
doing so I'd like to get initial feedback to make sure I am not missing
anything.
Note that this could probably be further improved by using information
from the original IV.
Attempt of modeling of the assumption in Alive2:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/H_DL_g
Part of a set of fixes required for PR50412.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103255
We currently collect the ICmp and Add from an induction variable,
marking them as dead so that vplan values are not created for them. This
extends that to include any single use trunk from the ICmp, which allows
the Add to more readily be removed too.
This can help with costing vplan nodes, as the ICmp and Add are more
reliably removed and are not double-counted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88873
This was reverted because of a miscompilation. At closer inspection, the
problem was actually visible in a changed llvm regression test too. This
one-line follow up fix/recommit will splat the IV, which is what we are trying
to avoid if unnecessary in general, if tail-folding is requested even if all
users are scalar instructions after vectorisation. Because with tail-folding,
the splat IV will be used by the predicate of the masked loads/stores
instructions. The previous version omitted this, which caused the
miscompilation. The original commit message was:
If tail-folding of the scalar remainder loop is applied, the primary induction
variable is splat to a vector and used by the masked load/store vector
instructions, thus the IV does not remain scalar. Because we now mark
that the IV does not remain scalar for these cases, we don't emit the vector IV
if it is not used. Thus, the vectoriser produces less dead code.
Thanks to Ayal Zaks for the direction how to fix this.
If tail-folding of the scalar remainder loop is applied, the primary induction
variable is splat to a vector and used by the masked load/store vector
instructions, thus the IV does not remain scalar. Because we now mark
that the IV does not remain scalar for these cases, we don't emit the vector IV
if it is not used. Thus, the vectoriser produces less dead code.
Thanks to Ayal Zaks for the direction how to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78911
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Summary:
Revert r325687 workaround for PR36032 since
a fix was committed in r326154.
Reviewers: sbaranga
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D44768
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
<evgeny.v.stupachenko@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 328257
Summary:
It turned out to be error-prone to expect the callers to handle that - better to
leave the decision to this routine and make the required data to be explicitly
passed to the function.
This handles the case that was missed in the r322473 and fixes the assert
mentioned in PR36524.
Reviewers: dorit, mssimpso, Ayal, dcaballe
Reviewed By: dcaballe
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, hiraditya, dneilson, hsaito, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43812
llvm-svn: 327960
