5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Arthur Eubanks
55cf09ae26 [ValueTracking] Simplify llvm::isPointerOffset()
We still need the code after stripAndAccumulateConstantOffsets() since
it doesn't handle GEPs of scalable types and non-constant but identical
indexes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120523
2022-03-14 09:32:36 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
a9029a33ff [OpaquePtr][ValueTracking] Check GEP source element type in isPointerOffset()
Fixes a MemCpyOpt miscompile with opaque pointers.
This function can be further cleaned up, but let's just fix the miscompile first.

Reviewed By: #opaque-pointers, nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119652
2022-02-13 10:35:38 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
d050010ea2 [test][MemCpyOpt] Rename test function 2022-02-12 17:44:51 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
12ba0659b4 [test][MemCpyOpt] Precommit test 2022-02-12 17:38:45 -08:00
Nikita Popov
90ec6dff86 [OpaquePtr] Forbid mixing typed and opaque pointers
Currently, opaque pointers are supported in two forms: The
-force-opaque-pointers mode, where all pointers are opaque and
typed pointers do not exist. And as a simple ptr type that can
coexist with typed pointers.

This patch removes support for the mixed mode. You either get
typed pointers, or you get opaque pointers, but not both. In the
(current) default mode, using ptr is forbidden. In -opaque-pointers
mode, all pointers are opaque.

The motivation here is that the mixed mode introduces additional
issues that don't exist in fully opaque mode. D105155 is an example
of a design problem. Looking at D109259, it would probably need
additional work to support mixed mode (e.g. to generate GEPs for
typed base but opaque result). Mixed mode will also end up
inserting many casts between i8* and ptr, which would require
significant additional work to consistently avoid.

I don't think the mixed mode is particularly valuable, as it
doesn't align with our end goal. The only thing I've found it to
be moderately useful for is adding some opaque pointer tests in
between typed pointer tests, but I think we can live without that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109290
2021-09-10 15:18:23 +02:00