Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
This patch tries to sink instructions when they are only used in a successor block.
This is a further enhancement patch based on Anna's commit:
D109700, which allows sinking an instruction having multiple uses in a single user.
In this patch, sink instructions with multiple users in a single successor block will be supported.
It could fix a known issue from rust:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51346#issuecomment-394443610
Reviewed By: nikic, reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121585
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
The `SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges` function was originally designed for
`CodeGenPrepare` and skipped splitting of edges when the destination
block didn't contain any `PHI` instructions. This only makes sense when
reducing COPYs like `CodeGenPrepare`. In the case of
`PGOInstrumentation` or `GCOVProfiling` it would result in missed
counters and wrong result in functions with computed goto.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120096
Unfortunately, it seems we really do need to take the long route;
start from the "merge" block, find (all the) "dispatch" blocks,
and deal with each "dispatch" block separately, instead of simply
starting from each "dispatch" block like it would logically make sense,
otherwise we run into a number of other missing folds around
`switch` formation, missing sinking/hoisting and phase ordering.
This reverts commit 85628ce75b3084dc0f185a320152baf85b59aba7.
This reverts commit c5fff9095342a792bf4b9a077fe3c3a83c4e566c.
This reverts commit 34a98e1046e3aa55e5f26ab20a15e96b4034d25a.
This reverts commit 1e353f092288309d74d380367aa50bbd383780ed.
The current `FoldTwoEntryPHINode()` is not quite designed correctly.
It starts from the merge point, and then tries to detect
the 'divergence' point.
Because of that, it is limited to the simple two-predecessor case,
where the PHI completely goes away. but that is rather pessimistic,
and it doesn't make much sense from the costmodel side of things.
For example if there is some other unrelated predecessor of
the merge point, we could split the merge point so that
the then/else blocks first branch to an empty block
and then to the merge point, and then we'd be able to speculate
the then/else code.
But if we'd instead simply start at the divergence point,
and look for the merge point, then we'll just natively support this case.
There's also the fact that `SpeculativelyExecuteBB()` already does
just that, but only if there is a single block to speculate,
and with a much more restrictive cost model.
But that also means we have code duplication.
Now, sadly, while this is as much NFCI as possible,
there is just no way to cleanly migrate to
the proper implementation. The results *are* going to be different
somewhat because of various phase ordering effects and SimplifyCFG
block iteration strategy.
Use the llvm flag `-pgo-function-entry-coverage` to create single byte "counters" to track functions coverage. This mode has significantly less size overhead in both code and data because
* We mark a function as "covered" with a store instead of an increment which generally requires fewer assembly instructions
* We use a single byte per function rather than 8 bytes per block
The trade off of course is that this mode only tells you if a function has been covered. This is useful, for example, to detect dead code.
When combined with debug info correlation [0] we are able to create an instrumented Clang binary that is only 150M (the vanilla Clang binary is 143M). That is an overhead of 7M (4.9%) compared to the default instrumentation (without value profiling) which has an overhead of 31M (21.7%).
[0] https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/r03Z6JoN7d4
Reviewed By: kyulee
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116180
In D115311, we're looking to modify clang to emit i constraints rather
than X constraints for callbr's indirect destinations. Prior to doing
so, update all of the existing tests in llvm/ to match.
Reviewed By: void, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115410
This patch prevents the optimizer from producing wide vectors in the IR,
specifically the MMA types (v256i1, v512i1). The idea is that on Power, we only
want to be producing these types only if the vector_pair and vector_quad types
are used specifically.
To prevent the optimizer from producing these types in the IR,
vectorCostAdjustmentFactor() is updated to return an instruction cost factor or
an invalid instruction cost if the current type is that of an MMA type. An
invalid instruction cost returned by this function signifies to other cost
computing functions to return the maximum instruction cost to inform the
optimizer that producing these types within the IR is expensive, and should not
be produced in the first place.
This issue was first seen in the test case included within this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113900
The `llvm.instrprof.increment` intrinsic uses `i32` for the index. We should use this same type for the index into the GEP instructions.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114268
The NS==0 condition used by D103717 missed a corner case: if the current copy
does not have a hash suffix (e.g. weak_odr), a copy with value profiling (with a
different CFG) may exist. This is super rare, but is possible with pre-inlining
PGO instrumentation (which can make a weak_odr function inlines its callees
differently, sometimes with value profiling while sometimes without).
If the current copy with private profd is prevailing, the non-prevailing copy
may get an undefined symbol if a caller inlining the non-prevailing function
references its profd. If the other copy with non-private profd is prevailing,
the current copy may cause a "relocation to discarded section" linker error.
The fix is straightforward: just keep non-private profd in such a `DataReferencedByCode` case.
With this change, a stage 2 (`-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED=IR`)
clang is 0.08% larger (172431496/172286720-1).
`stat -c %s **/*.o | awk '{s+=$1}END{print s}' is 0.026% larger.
The majority of D103717's benefits remains.
Reviewed By: xur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108432
This reverts commit f653beea88d2684cdc8117e662b321ba04666771.
It broke Windows coverage-inline.cpp because link.exe has a limitation
that external symbols in IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE don't work.
It essentially dropped the previous size optimization for coverage
because coverage doesn't rename comdat by default.
Needs more investigation what we should do.
The NS==0 condition used by D103717 missed a corner case: if the current copy
does not have a hash suffix (e.g. weak_odr), a copy with value profiling (with a
different CFG) may exist. This is super rare, but is possible with pre-inlining
PGO instrumentation (which can make a weak_odr function inlines its callees
differently, sometimes with value profiling while sometimes without).
If the current copy with private profd is prevailing, the non-prevailing copy
may get an undefined symbol if a caller inlining the non-prevailing function
references its profd. If the other copy with non-private profd is prevailing,
the current copy may cause a "relocation to discarded section" linker error.
The fix is straightforward: just keep non-private profd in this case.
With this change, a stage 2 (`-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED=IR`)
clang is 0.08% larger (172431496/172286720-1).
`stat -c %s **/*.o | awk '{s+=$1}END{print s}' is 0.026% larger.
The majority of D103717's benefits remains.
Reviewed By: xur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108432
The IRPGOFlag symbol (__llvm_profile_raw_version) is dropped when
identified as non-prevailing for either regular or thin LTO during
the mixed-LTO mode compilation. This happens in the module where
IRPGOFlag is marked as non-prevailing. This variable
is emitted in the final object from the prevailing module.
This is still problematic because we currently query this symbol
to coordinate some actions between PGOInstrumentation pass
and InstrProfiling lowering pass, like whether to do value
profiling, whether to do comdat renaming.
This problem is bought up by YolandaCY in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D107034
YolandCY reported unresolved symbol linker errors in
CSPGO instrumentation build for chromium.
This patch let LTO retain IRPGOFlag decl by adding it to
CompilerUsed list and relax the check in isIRPGOFlagSet() when
doing the InstrProfiling lowering.
The test case in the patch is from D107034
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D107034>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108581
Previously we would allow promotion even if the byval/inalloca
attributes on the call and the callee didn't match.
It's ok if the byval/inalloca types aren't the same. For example, LTO
importing may rename types.
Fixes PR51397.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107998
Change `CountersPtr` in `__profd_` to a label difference, which is a link-time
constant. On ELF, when linking a shared object, this requires that `__profc_` is
either private or linkonce/linkonce_odr hidden. On COFF, we need D104564 so that
`.quad a-b` (64-bit label difference) can lower to a 32-bit PC-relative relocation.
```
# ELF: R_X86_64_PC64 (PC-relative)
.quad .L__profc_foo-.L__profd_foo
# Mach-O: a pair of 8-byte X86_64_RELOC_UNSIGNED and X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR
.quad l___profc_foo-l___profd_foo
# COFF: we actually use IMAGE_REL_AMD64_REL32/IMAGE_REL_ARM64_REL32 so
# the high 32-bit value is zero even if .L__profc_foo < .L__profd_foo
# As compensation, we truncate CountersDelta in the header so that
# __llvm_profile_merge_from_buffer and llvm-profdata reader keep working.
.quad .L__profc_foo-.L__profd_foo
```
(Note: link.exe sorts `.lprfc` before `.lprfd` even if the object writer
has `.lprfd` before `.lprfc`, so we cannot work around by reordering
`.lprfc` and `.lprfd`.)
With this change, a stage 2 (`-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED=IR`)
`ld -pie` linked clang is 1.74% smaller due to fewer R_X86_64_RELATIVE relocations.
```
% readelf -r pie | awk '$3~/R.*/{s[$3]++} END {for (k in s) print k, s[k]}'
R_X86_64_JUMP_SLO 331
R_X86_64_TPOFF64 2
R_X86_64_RELATIVE 476059 # was: 607712
R_X86_64_64 2616
R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT 31
```
The absolute function address (used by llvm-profdata to collect indirect call
targets) can be converted to relative as well, but is not done in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104556
This function is called when some predecessor of an empty return block
ends with a conditional branch, with both successors being empty ret blocks.
Now, because of the way SimplifyCFG works, it might happen to simplify
one of the blocks in a way that makes a conditional branch
into an unconditional one, since it's destinations are now identical,
but it might not have actually simplified said conditional branch
into an unconditional one yet.
So, we have to check that ourselves first,
especially now that SimplifyCFG aggressively tail-merges
all ret and resume blocks.
Even if it was an unconditional branch already,
`SimplifyCFGOpt::simplifyReturn()` doesn't call `FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch()`
by default.
`SinkCommonCodeFromPredecessors()` doesn't itself ensure that duplicate PHI nodes aren't created.
I suppose, we could teach it to do that on-the-fly (& account for the already-existing PHI nodes,
& adjust costmodel), the diff will be bigger than this.
The alternative is to schedule a new EarlyCSE pass invocation somewhere later in the pipeline.
Clearly, we don't have any EarlyCSE runs in module optimization passline, so this pattern isn't cleaned up...
That would perhaps better, but it will again have some compile time impact.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106010
There was an alias between 'simplifycfg' and 'simplify-cfg' in the
PassRegistry. That was the original reason for this patch, which
effectively removes the alias.
This patch also replaces all occurrances of 'simplify-cfg'
by 'simplifycfg'. Reason for choosing that form for the name is
that it matches the DEBUG_TYPE for the pass, and the legacy PM name
and also how it is spelled out in other passes such as
'loop-simplifycfg', and in other options such as
'simplifycfg-merge-cond-stores'.
I for some reason the name should be changed to 'simplify-cfg' in
the future, then I think such a renaming should be more widely done
and not only impacting the PassRegistry.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105627
Based ontop of D104598, which is a NFCI-ish refactoring.
Here, a restriction, that only empty blocks can be merged, is lifted.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104597
On ELF, the D1003372 optimization can apply to more cases. There are two
prerequisites for making `__profd_` private:
* `__profc_` keeps `__profd_` live under compiler/linker GC
* `__profd_` is not referenced by code
The first is satisfied because all counters/data are in a section group (either
`comdat any` or `comdat noduplicates`). The second requires that the function
does not use value profiling.
Regarding the second point: `__profd_` may be referenced by other text sections
due to inlining. There will be a linker error if a prevailing text section
references the non-prevailing local symbol.
With this change, a stage 2 (`-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED=IR`)
clang is 4.2% smaller (1-169620032/177066968).
`stat -c %s **/*.o | awk '{s+=$1}END{print s}' is 2.5% smaller.
Reviewed By: davidxl, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103717
This reverts commit 76d0747e0807307780ba84cbd7e5c80b20c26bd7.
If a group has `__llvm_prf_vals` due to static value profiler counters
(`NS!=0`), we cannot make `__llvm_prf_data` private, because a prevailing text
section may reference `__llvm_prf_data` and will cause a `relocation refers to a
discarded section` linker error.
Note: while a `__profc_` group is non-prevailing, it may be referenced by a
prevailing text section due to inlining.
```
group section [ 66] `.group' [__profc__ZN5clang20EmitClangDeclContextERN4llvm12RecordKeeperERNS0_11raw_ostreamE] contains 4 sections:
[Index] Name
[ 67] __llvm_prf_cnts
[ 68] __llvm_prf_vals
[ 69] __llvm_prf_data
[ 70] .rela__llvm_prf_data
```
For ELF, since all counters/data are in a section group (either `comdat any` or
`comdat noduplicates`), and the signature for `comdat any` is `__profc_`, the
D1003372 optimization prerequisite (linker GC cannot discard data variables
while the text section is retained) is always satisified, we can make __profd_
unconditionally private.
Reviewed By: davidxl, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103717
This patch is to address https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50610.
In computed goto pattern, there are usually a list of basic blocks that are all targets of indirectbr instruction, and each basic block also has address taken and stored in a variable.
CHR pass could potentially clone these basic blocks, which would generate a cloned version of the indirectbr and clonved version of all basic blocks in the list.
However these basic blocks will not have their addresses taken and stored anywhere. So latter SimplifyCFG pass will simply remove all tehse cloned basic blocks, resulting in incorrect code.
To fix this, when searching for scopes, we skip scopes that contains BBs with addresses taken.
Added a few test cases.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, wenlei, hoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103867
`__profd_*` variables are referenced by code only when value profiling is
enabled. If disabled (e.g. default -fprofile-instr-generate), the symbols just
waste space on ELF/Mach-O. We change the comdat symbol from `__profd_*` to
`__profc_*` because an internal symbol does not provide deduplication features
on COFF. The choice doesn't matter on ELF.
(In -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED_COVERAGE=on build, there is now no `__profd_*` symbols.)
On Windows this enables further optimization. We are no longer affected by the
link.exe limitation: an external symbol in IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE can
cause duplicate definition error.
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-May/150758.html
We can thus use llvm.compiler.used instead of llvm.used like ELF (D97585).
This avoids many `/INCLUDE:` directives in `.drectve`.
Here is rnk's measurement for Chrome:
```
This reduced object file size of base_unittests.exe, compiled with coverage, optimizations, and gmlt debug info by 10%:
#BEFORE
$ find . -iname '*.obj' | xargs du -b | awk '{ sum += $1 } END { print sum}'
1047758867
$ du -cksh base_unittests.exe
82M base_unittests.exe
82M total
# AFTER
$ find . -iname '*.obj' | xargs du -b | awk '{ sum += $1 } END { print sum}'
937886499
$ du -cksh base_unittests.exe
78M base_unittests.exe
78M total
```
The change is NFC for Mach-O.
Reviewed By: davidxl, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103372
`__profd_*` variables are referenced by code only when value profiling is
enabled. If disabled (e.g. default -fprofile-instr-generate), the symbols just
waste space on ELF/Mach-O. We change the comdat symbol from `__profd_*` to
`__profc_*` because an internal symbol does not provide deduplication features
on COFF. The choice doesn't matter on ELF.
(In -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED_COVERAGE=on build, there is now no `__profd_*` symbols.)
On Windows this enables further optimization. We are no longer affected by the
link.exe limitation: an external symbol in IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ASSOCIATIVE can
cause duplicate definition error.
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-May/150758.html
We can thus use llvm.compiler.used instead of llvm.used like ELF (D97585).
This avoids many `/INCLUDE:` directives in `.drectve`.
Here is rnk's measurement for Chrome:
```
This reduced object file size of base_unittests.exe, compiled with coverage, optimizations, and gmlt debug info by 10%:
#BEFORE
$ find . -iname '*.obj' | xargs du -b | awk '{ sum += $1 } END { print sum}'
1047758867
$ du -cksh base_unittests.exe
82M base_unittests.exe
82M total
# AFTER
$ find . -iname '*.obj' | xargs du -b | awk '{ sum += $1 } END { print sum}'
937886499
$ du -cksh base_unittests.exe
78M base_unittests.exe
78M total
```
Reviewed By: davidxl, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103372
This is a patch that disables the poison-unsafe select -> and/or i1 folding.
It has been blocking D72396 and also has been the source of a few miscompilations
described in llvm.org/pr49688 .
D99674 conditionally blocked this folding and successfully fixed the latter one.
The former one was still blocked, and this patch addresses it.
Note that a few test functions that has `_logical` suffix are now deoptimized.
These are created by @nikic to check the impact of disabling this optimization
by copying existing original functions and replacing and/or with select.
I can see that most of these are poison-unsafe; they can be revived by introducing
freeze instruction. I left comments at fcmp + select optimizations (or-fcmp.ll, and-fcmp.ll)
because I think they are good targets for freeze fix.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101191
Hoisting and sinking instructions out of conditional blocks enables
additional vectorization by:
1. Executing memory accesses unconditionally.
2. Reducing the number of instructions that need predication.
After disabling early hoisting / sinking, we miss out on a few
vectorization opportunities. One of those is causing a ~10% performance
regression in one of the Geekbench benchmarks on AArch64.
This patch tires to recover the regression by running hoisting/sinking
as part of a SimplifyCFG run after LoopRotate and before LoopVectorize.
Note that in the legacy pass-manager, we run LoopRotate just before
vectorization again and there's no SimplifyCFG run in between, so the
sinking/hoisting may impact the later run on LoopRotate. But the impact
should be limited and the benefit of hosting/sinking at this stage
should outweigh the risk of not rotating.
Compile-time impact looks slightly positive for most cases.
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=2ea7fb7b1c045a7d60fcccf3df3ebb26aa3699e5&to=e58b4a763c691da651f25996aad619cb3d946faf&stat=instructions
NewPM-O3: geomean -0.19%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: geoman -0.54%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: geomean -0.03%
With a few benchmarks seeing a notable increase, but also some
improvements.
Alternative to D101290.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101468
2nd try (original: 27ae17a6b014) with fix/test for crash. We must make
sure that TTI is available before trying to use it because it is not
required (might be another bug).
Original commit message:
This is one step towards solving:
https://llvm.org/PR49336
In that example, we disregard the recommended usage of builtin_expect,
so an expensive (unpredictable) branch is folded into another branch
that is guarding it.
Here, we read the profile metadata to see if the 1st (predecessor)
condition is likely to cause execution to bypass the 2nd (successor)
condition before merging conditions by using logic ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98898
This relands commit 99108c791de0285ee726a10e8274772b18cee73c (D95026) which was
reverted by 8d5a981a135a0f0ae0a10c59b7c8093aae1c28de because the underlying
problem (https://llvm.org/pr49495) is fixed.
This reverts commit 27ae17a6b0145a559c501c35ded0ab4e9dd69e8e.
There are bot failures that end with:
#4 0x00007fff7ae3c9b8 CrashRecoverySignalHandler(int) CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:0:0
#5 0x00007fff84e504d8 (linux-vdso64.so.1+0x4d8)
#6 0x00007fff7c419a5c llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getPredictableBranchThreshold() const (/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64le-multistage/stage1.install/bin/../lib/libLLVMAnalysis.so.13git+0x479a5c)
...but not sure how to trigger that yet.
This is one step towards solving:
https://llvm.org/PR49336
In that example, we disregard the recommended usage of builtin_expect,
so an expensive (unpredictable) branch is folded into another branch
that is guarding it.
Here, we read the profile metadata to see if the 1st (predecessor)
condition is likely to cause execution to bypass the 2nd (successor)
condition before merging conditions by using logic ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98898
".llvm." suffix".
The recommit fixed a bug that symbols with "." at the beginning is not
properly handled in the last commit.
Original commit message:
Currently IndirectCallPromotion simply strip everything after the first "."
in LTO mode, in order to match the symbol name and the name with ".llvm."
suffix in the value profile. However, if -funique-internal-linkage-names
and thinlto are both enabled, the name may have both ".__uniq." suffix and
".llvm." suffix, and the current mechanism will strip them both, which is
unexpected. The patch fixes the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98389
".llvm." suffix.
Currently IndirectCallPromotion simply strip everything after the first "."
in LTO mode, in order to match the symbol name and the name with ".llvm."
suffix in the value profile. However, if -funique-internal-linkage-names
and thinlto are both enabled, the name may have both ".__uniq." suffix and
".llvm." suffix, and the current mechanism will strip them both, which is
unexpected. The patch fixes the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98389
1. PGOMemOPSizeOpt grabs only the first, up to five (by default) entries from
the value profile metadata and preserves the remaining entries for the fallback
memop call site. If there are more than five entries, the rest of the entries
would get dropped. This is fine for PGOMemOPSizeOpt itself as it only promotes
up to 3 (by default) values, but potentially not for other downstream passes
that may use the value profile metadata.
2. PGOMemOPSizeOpt originally assumed that only values 0 through 8 are kept
track of. When the range buckets were introduced, it was changed to skip the
range buckets, but since it does not grab all entries (only five), if some range
buckets exist in the first five entries, it could potentially cause fewer
promotion opportunities (eg. if 4 out of 5 were range buckets, it may be able to
promote up to one non-range bucket, as opposed to 3.) Also, combined with 1, it
means that wrong entries may be preserved, as it didn't correctly keep track of
which were entries were skipped.
To fix this, PGOMemOPSizeOpt now grabs all the entries (up to the maximum number
of value profile buckets), keeps track of which entries were skipped, and
preserves all the remaining entries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97592
This reverts commit 99108c791de0285ee726a10e8274772b18cee73c.
Clang is miscompiling LLVM with this change, a stage-2 build hits
multiple failures.
As a repro, I built clang in a stage1 directory and used it this way:
cmake -G Ninja ../llvm \
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=`pwd`/../build-stage1/bin/clang++ \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=`pwd`/../build-stage1/bin/clang \
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;NVPTX;AMDGPU" \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=mlir \
-DLLVM_BUILD_EXAMPLES=ON \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On
ninja check-mlir
This patch makes FoldBranchToCommonDest merge branch conditions into `select i1` rather than `and/or i1` when it is called by SimplifyCFG.
It is known that merging conditions into and/or is poison-unsafe, and this is towards making things *more* correct by removing possible miscompilations.
Currently, InstCombine simply consumes these selects into and/or of i1 (which is also unsafe), so the visible effect would be very small. The unsafe select -> and/or transformation will be removed in the future.
There has been efforts for updating optimizations to support the select form as well, and they are linked to D93065.
The safe transformation is fired when it is called by SimplifyCFG only. This is done by setting the new `PoisonSafe` argument as true.
Another place that calls FoldBranchToCommonDest is LoopSimplify. `PoisonSafe` flag is set to false in this case because enabling it has a nontrivial impact in performance because SCEV is more conservative with select form and InductiveRangeCheckElimination isn't aware of select form of and/or i1.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95026
