7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Arthur Eubanks
6699029b67 [NewPM][opt] Run the "default" AA pipeline by default
We tend to assume that the AA pipeline is by default the default AA
pipeline and it's confusing when it's empty instead.

PR48779

Initially reverted due to BasicAA running analyses in an unspecified
order (multiple function calls as parameters), fixed by fetching
analyses before the call to construct BasicAA.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95117
2021-01-21 21:08:54 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
ba9b4ea4ee Revert "[NewPM][opt] Run the "default" AA pipeline by default"
This reverts commit be611431cd1f5c826a55b531db92a63e84323866.

Other/new-pm-lto-defaults.ll failing
2021-01-21 20:16:34 -08:00
Arthur Eubanks
be611431cd [NewPM][opt] Run the "default" AA pipeline by default
We tend to assume that the AA pipeline is by default the default AA
pipeline and it's confusing when it's empty instead.

PR48779

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95117
2021-01-21 19:46:38 -08:00
Eric Christopher
cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
290a839891 [LTO] Record whether LTOUnit splitting is enabled in index
Summary:
Records in the module summary index whether the bitcode was compiled
with the option necessary to enable splitting the LTO unit
(e.g. -fsanitize=cfi, -fwhole-program-vtables, or -fsplit-lto-unit).

The information is passed down to the ModuleSummaryIndex builder via a
new module flag "EnableSplitLTOUnit", which is propagated onto a flag
on the summary index.

This is then used during the LTO link to check whether all linked
summaries were built with the same value of this flag. If not, an error
is issued when we detect a situation requiring whole program visibility
of the class hierarchy. This is the case when both of the following
conditions are met:
1) We are performing LowerTypeTests or Whole Program Devirtualization.
2) There are type tests or type checked loads in the code.

Note I have also changed the ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to also gate the
module splitting on the value of this flag.

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: ormris, mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53890

llvm-svn: 350948
2019-01-11 18:31:57 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
01f0c8a8c4 [PM/ThinLTO] Fix PR33536, a bug where the ThinLTO bitcode writer was
querying for analysis results on a function declaration rather than
a definition.

The only reason this worked previously is by chance -- because the way
we got alias analysis results with the legacy PM, we happened to not
compute a dominator tree and so we happened to not hit an assert even
though it didn't make any real sense. Now we bail out before trying to
compute alias analysis so that we don't hit these asserts.

llvm-svn: 307625
2017-07-11 05:39:20 +00:00