- Adds default implementations of `isDefinedOutsideOfLoop` and `moveOutOfLoop` since 99% of all implementations of these functions were identical
- `moveOutOfLoop` takes one operation and doesn't return anything anymore. 100% of all implementations of this function would always return `success` and uses would either respond with a pass failure or an `llvm_unreachable`.
The revision introduces a affine.min and affine.max canonicalization pattern that orders the result expressions. It flattens the result expressions to arrays of dimension and symbol coefficients plus one constant coefficient and rearranges them in lexicographic order.
Without the pattern, CSE will not eliminate two affine.min / affine.max operation if the results are ordered differently. For example, the operations
```
%1 = affine.min affine_map<(d0) -> (8, -d0 + 27)>(%arg4)
%2 = affine.min affine_map<(d0) -> (-d0 + 27, 8)>(%arg4)
```
doe not CSE. After applying the pattern, the two operations are equivalent
```
%1 = affine.min affine_map<(d0) -> (8, -d0 + 27)>(%arg4)
%2 = affine.min affine_map<(d0) -> (8, -d0 + 27)>(%arg4)
```
which enables CSE.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121819
I am not sure about the meaning of Type in the name (was it meant be interpreted as Kind?), and given the importance and meaning of Type in the context of MLIR, its probably better to rename it. Given the comment in the source code, the suggestion in the GitHub issue and the final discussions in the review, this patch renames the OperandType to UnresolvedOperand.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54446
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122142
Fold affine.load ops on global constant memrefs when indices are all
constant.
Reviewed By: ayzhuang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120612
This PR exposes the region-based isTopLevelValue,
which is useful for other code that performs Affine transformations,
but is not within AffineOps.cpp
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121877
The getAffineScope function is currently internal
to AffineOps.cpp. However, as the comment on the function
itself notes, this is useful in a variety of other places
externally. This PR allows other files to use the function.
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121827
In this CL, update the function name of verifier according to the
behavior. If a verifier needs to access the region then it'll be updated
to `verifyRegions`.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120373
Currently when we fold an empty loop, we assume that any loop
with iterArgs returns its iterArgs in order, which is not always
the case. It may return values defined outside of the loop or
return its iterArgs out of order. This patch adds support to
those cases.
Reviewed By: dcaballe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120776
This change gives explicit order of verifier execution and adds
`hasRegionVerifier` and `verifyWithRegions` to increase the granularity
of verifier classification. The orders are as below,
1. InternalOpTrait will be verified first, they can be run independently.
2. `verifyInvariants` which is constructed by ODS, it verifies the type,
attributes, .etc.
3. Other Traits/Interfaces that have marked their verifier as
`verifyTrait` or `verifyWithRegions=0`.
4. Custom verifier which is defined in the op and has marked
`hasVerifier=1`
If an operation has regions, then it may have the second phase,
5. Traits/Interfaces that have marked their verifier as
`verifyRegionTrait` or
`verifyWithRegions=1`. This implies the verifier needs to access the
operations in its regions.
6. Custom verifier which is defined in the op and has marked
`hasRegionVerifier=1`
Note that the second phase will be run after the operations in the
region are verified. Based on the verification order, you will be able to
avoid verifying duplicate things.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116789
This transformation is useful to break dependency between consecutive loop
iterations by increasing the size of a temporary buffer. This is usually
combined with heavy software pipelining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119406
The Utils.cpp file in StandardOps essentially just contains utilities for interacting with arithmetic
operations, and at this point makes more sense as a utility file for the arithemtic dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118280
Currently if an operation requires additional verification, it specifies an inline
code block (`let verifier = "blah"`). This is quite problematic for various reasons, e.g.
it requires defining C++ inside of Tablegen which is discouraged when possible, but mainly because
nearly all usages simply forward to a static function `static LogicalResult verify(SomeOp op)`.
This commit adds support for a `hasVerifier` bit field that specifies if an additional verifier
is needed, and when set to `1` declares a `LogicalResult verify()` method for operations to
override. For migration purposes, the existing behavior is untouched. Upstream usages will
be replaced in a followup to keep this patch focused on the hasVerifier implementation.
One main user facing change is that what was one `MyOp::verify` is now `MyOp::verifyInvariants`.
This better matches the name this method is called everywhere else, and also frees up `verify` for
the user defined additional verification. The `verify` function when generated now (for additional
verification) is private to the operation class, which should also help avoid accidental usages after
this switch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118742
BlockArguments gained the ability to have locations attached a while ago, but they
have always been optional. This goes against the core tenant of MLIR where location
information is a requirement, so this commit updates the API to require locations.
Fixes#53279
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117633
The leading space that is always printed at the beginning of regions is not consistent with other parts of the printing API. Moreover, this leading space can lead to undesirable assembly formats:
```
attr-dict-with-keyword $region
```
Prints as:
```
// Two spaces between `}` and `{`
attributes {foo} { ... }
```
Moreover, the leading space results in the odd generic op format:
```
"test.op"() ( {...}) : () -> ()
```
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117411
Per the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D116345 it makes sense
to move AtomicRMWOp out of the standard dialect. This was accentuated by the
need to add a fold op with a memref::cast. The only dialect
that would permit this is the memref dialect (keeping it in the standard dialect
or moving it to the arithmetic dialect would require those dialects to have a
dependency on the memref dialect, which breaks linking).
As the AtomicRMWKind enum is used throughout, this has been moved to Arith.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116392
Initially before appending the newly composed dimension and symbols
to the dimension and symbol list whose size is to be passed in
AffineMap::get(), the call to the AffineMap::get() was made, resulting
in wrong dimCount and symbolCount being passed as argument. We move the
call to the AffineMap::get() after the diimension and symbol list are
updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114237
There are several aspects of the API that either aren't easy to use, or are
deceptively easy to do the wrong thing. The main change of this commit
is to remove all of the `getValue<T>`/`getFlatValue<T>` from ElementsAttr
and instead provide operator[] methods on the ranges returned by
`getValues<T>`. This provides a much more convenient API for the value
ranges. It also removes the easy-to-be-inefficient nature of
getValue/getFlatValue, which under the hood would construct a new range for
the type `T`. Constructing a range is not necessarily cheap in all cases, and
could lead to very poor performance if used within a loop; i.e. if you were to
naively write something like:
```
DenseElementsAttr attr = ...;
for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
// We are internally rebuilding the APFloat value range on each iteration!!
APFloat it = attr.getFlatValue<APFloat>(i);
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113229
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
1. Add support to vectorize induction variables of loops that are
not mapped to any vector dimension in SuperVectorize pass.
2. Fix a bug in getForInductionVarOwner.
Reviewed By: dcaballe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111370
The former is redundant because the later carries it as part of
its builder. Add a getContext() helper method to DialectAsmParser
to make this more convenient, and stop passing the context around
explicitly. This simplifies ODS generated parser hooks for attrs
and types.
This resolves PR51985
Recommit 4b32f8bac4 after fixing a dependency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110796
The former is redundant because the later carries it as part of
its builder. Add a getContext() helper method to DialectAsmParser
to make this more convenient, and stop passing the context around
explicitly. This simplifies ODS generated parser hooks for attrs
and types.
This resolves PR51985
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110796
Unroll-and-jam currently doesn't work when the loop being unroll-and-jammed
or any of its inner loops has iter_args. This patch modifies the
unroll-and-jam utility to support loops with iter_args.
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110085
This aligns the printer with the parser contract: the operation isn't part of the user-controllable part of the syntax.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108804
Simplify affine.min ops, enabling various other canonicalizations inside the peeled loop body.
affine.min ops such as:
```
map = affine_map<(d0)[s0, s1] -> (s0, -d0 + s1)>
%r = affine.min #affine.min #map(%iv)[%step, %ub]
```
are rewritten them into (in the case the peeled loop):
```
%r = %step
```
To determine how an affine.min op should be rewritten and to prove its correctness, FlatAffineConstraints is utilized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107222
Silence clang-tidy warning in AffineOps.cpp due to the inability to see
through the typeswitch. NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106125
Fix affine.for empty loop body folder in the presence of yield values.
The existing pattern ignored iter_args/yield values and thus crashed
when yield values had uses.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106121
AffineForOp's folding hook is expected to fold away trivially empty
affine.for. This allows simplification to happen as part of the
canonicalizer and from wherever the folding hook is used. While more
complex analysis based zero trip count detection is available from other
passes in analysis and transforms, simple and inexpensive folding had
been missing.
Also, update/improve affine.for op documentation clarifying semantics of
the result values for zero trip count loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106123
Changes include the following:
1. Single iteration reduction loops being sibling fused at innermost insertion level
are skipped from being considered as sequential loops.
Otherwise, the slice bounds of these loops is reset.
2. Promote loops that are skipped in previous step into outer loops.
3. Two utility function - buildSliceTripCountMap, getSliceIterationCount - are moved from
mlir/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopFusionUtils.cpp to mlir/lib/Analysis/Utils.cpp
Reviewed By: bondhugula, vinayaka-polymage
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104249
When an affine.if operation is returning/yielding results and has a
trivially true or false condition, then its 'then' or 'else' block,
respectively, is promoted to the affine.if's parent block and then, the
affine.if operation is replaced by the correct results/yield values.
Relevant test cases are also added.
Signed-off-by: Srishti Srivastava <srishti.srivastava@polymagelabs.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105418
* Split memref.dim into two operations: memref.dim and tensor.dim. Both ops have the same builder interface and op argument names, so that they can be used with templates in patterns that apply to both tensors and memrefs (e.g., some patterns in Linalg).
* Add constant materializer to TensorDialect (needed for folding in affine.apply etc.).
* Remove some MemRefDialect dependencies, make some explicit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105165
* Previously, we were only generating .h.inc files. We foresee the need to also generate implementations and this is a step towards that.
* Discussed in https://llvm.discourse.group/t/generating-cpp-inc-files-for-dialects/3732/2
* Deviates from the discussion above by generating a default constructor in the .cpp.inc file (and adding a tablegen bit that disables this in case if this is user provided).
* Generating the destructor started as a way to flush out the missing includes (produces a link error), but it is a strict improvement on its own that is worth doing (i.e. by emitting key methods in the .cpp file, we root vtables in one translation unit, which is a non-controversial improvement).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105070
The commit simplifies affine.if ops :
The affine if operation gets removed if the condition is universally true or false and then/else block is merged with the parent block.
Signed-off-by: Shashij Gupta shashij.gupta@polymagelabs.com
Reviewed By: bondhugula, pr4tgpt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104015
Currently canonicalizations of a store and a cast try to fold all casts into the store.
In the case where the operand being stored is itself a cast, this is illegal as the type of the value being stored
will change. This PR fixes this by not checking the value for folding with a cast.
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D103828
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103829
Allow support for specifying empty IVs in an `affine.parallel`.
For example:
```
affine.parallel () = () to () {
affine.yield
}
```
Reviewed By: bondhugula, jbruestle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102895
This change allows the SRC and DST of dma_start operations to be located in the
same memory space. This applies to both the Affine dialect and Memref dialect
versions of these Ops. The documention has been updated to reflect this by
explicitly stating overlapping memory locations are not supported (undefined
behavior).
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102274
Added canonicalization for vector_load and vector_store. An existing
pattern SimplifyAffineOp can be reused to compose maps that supplies
result into them. Added AffineVectorStoreOp and AffineVectorLoadOp
into static_assert of SimplifyAffineOp to allow operation to use it.
This fixes the bug filed: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50058
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101691
This enables to express more complex parallel loops in the affine framework,
for example, in cases of tiling by sizes not dividing loop trip counts perfectly
or inner wavefront parallelism, among others. One can't use affine.max/min
and supply values to the nested loop bounds since the results of such
affine.max/min operations aren't valid symbols. Making them valid symbols
isn't an option since they would introduce selection trees into memref
subscript arithmetic as an unintended and undesired consequence. Also
add support for converting such loops to SCF. Drop some API that isn't used in
the core repo from AffineParallelOp since its semantics becomes ambiguous in
presence of max/min bounds. Loop normalization is currently unavailable for
such loops.
Depends On D101171
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101172
