Only using that change in StringRef already decreases the number of
preoprocessed lines from 7837621 to 7776151 for LLVMSupport
Perhaps more interestingly, it shows that many files were relying on the
inclusion of StringRef.h to have the declaration from STLExtras.h. This
patch tries hard to patch relevant part of llvm-project impacted by this
hidden dependency removal.
Potential impact:
- "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" no longer includes <memory>,
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h" nor "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
Related Discourse thread:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup/5831
This revision optimizes the parsing of hex strings by using the checked variant of llvm::fromHex, and adding a specialized method to Token for extracting hex strings. This leads a large decrease in compile time when parsing large hex constants (one example: 2.6 seconds -> 370 miliseconds)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90266
Summary: At this point Parser has grown to be over 5000 lines and can be very difficult to navigate/update/etc. This commit splits Parser.cpp into several sub files focused on parsing specific types of entities; e.g., Attributes, Types, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81299
Summary:
While here, simplify the lexer a bit by eliminating the unneeded 'operator'
classification of certain sigils, they can just be treated as 'punctuation'.
Reviewers: rriddle!
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, Joonsoo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76647
Thus far IntegerType has been signless: a value of IntegerType does
not have a sign intrinsically and it's up to the specific operation
to decide how to interpret those bits. For example, std.addi does
two's complement arithmetic, and std.divis/std.diviu treats the first
bit as a sign.
This design choice was made some time ago when we did't have lots
of dialects and dialects were more rigid. Today we have much more
extensible infrastructure and different dialect may want different
modelling over integer signedness. So while we can say we want
signless integers in the standard dialect, we cannot dictate for
others. Requiring each dialect to model the signedness semantics
with another set of custom types is duplicating the functionality
everywhere, considering the fundamental role integer types play.
This CL extends the IntegerType with a signedness semantics bit.
This gives each dialect an option to opt in signedness semantics
if that's what they want and helps code sharing. The parser is
modified to recognize `si[1-9][0-9]*` and `ui[1-9][0-9]*` as
signed and unsigned integer types, respectively, leaving the
original `i[1-9][0-9]*` to continue to mean no indication over
signedness semantics. All existing dialects are not affected (yet)
as this is a feature to opt in.
More discussions can be found at:
https://groups.google.com/a/tensorflow.org/d/msg/mlir/XmkV8HOPWpo/7O4X0Nb_AQAJ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72533
The restriction that symbols can only have identifier names is arbitrary, and artificially limits the names that a symbol may have. This change adds support for parsing and printing symbols that don't fit in the 'bare-identifier' grammar by printing the reference in quotes, e.g. @"0_my_reference" can now be used as a symbol name.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 273644768
This is doing it in a suboptimal manner by recombining [integer period literal] into a string literal and parsing that via to_float.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 206855106
Loop bounds and presumed to be constants for now and are stored in ForStmt as affine constant expressions. ML function arguments, return statement operands and loop variable name are dropped for now.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 205256208
important for low-bitwidth inference cases and hardware synthesis targets.
Rename 'int' to 'affineint' to avoid confusion between "the integers" and "the int
type".
PiperOrigin-RevId: 202751508
Run test case:
$ mlir-opt test/IR/parser-affine-map.mlir
test/IR/parser-affine-map.mlir:3:30: error: expect '(' at start of map range
#hello_world2 (i, j) [s0] -> i+s0, j)
^
PiperOrigin-RevId: 202736856
to share code a bit more, and fixes a diagnostic bug Uday pointed out where
parseCommaSeparatedList would print the wrong diagnostic when the end signifier
was not a ).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 202676858
class.
Introduce an Identifier class to MLIRContext to represent uniqued identifiers,
introduce string literal support to the lexer, introducing parser and printer
support etc.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 202592007
- parsing affine map identifiers
- place-holder classes for AffineMap
- module contains a list of affine maps (defined at the top level).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 202336919
This is pretty much minimal scaffolding for this step. Basic block arguments,
instructions, other terminators, a proper IR representation for
blocks/instructions, etc are all coming.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 201826439
Semi-affine maps and address spaces are not yet supported (someone want to take
this on?). We also don't generate IR objects for types yet, which I plan to
tackle next.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 201754283
