Make MaxSI, MaxUI, MinSI and MinUI commutative, so they will be canonicalized to have its constants appear as the second operand. And the constant folder will match more cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122225
The remanants of Standard was renamed to Func, but the test directory
remained named as Standard. In adidition to fixing the name, this commit
also moves the tests for operations not in the Func dialect to the proper
parent dialect test directory.
The last remaining operations in the standard dialect all revolve around
FuncOp/function related constructs. This patch simply handles the initial
renaming (which by itself is already huge), but there are a large number
of cleanups unlocked/necessary afterwards:
* Removing a bunch of unnecessary dependencies on Func
* Cleaning up the From/ToStandard conversion passes
* Preparing for the move of FuncOp to the Func dialect
See the discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120624
This change gives explicit order of verifier execution and adds
`hasRegionVerifier` and `verifyWithRegions` to increase the granularity
of verifier classification. The orders are as below,
1. InternalOpTrait will be verified first, they can be run independently.
2. `verifyInvariants` which is constructed by ODS, it verifies the type,
attributes, .etc.
3. Other Traits/Interfaces that have marked their verifier as
`verifyTrait` or `verifyWithRegions=0`.
4. Custom verifier which is defined in the op and has marked
`hasVerifier=1`
If an operation has regions, then it may have the second phase,
5. Traits/Interfaces that have marked their verifier as
`verifyRegionTrait` or
`verifyWithRegions=1`. This implies the verifier needs to access the
operations in its regions.
6. Custom verifier which is defined in the op and has marked
`hasRegionVerifier=1`
Note that the second phase will be run after the operations in the
region are verified. Based on the verification order, you will be able to
avoid verifying duplicate things.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116789
Given a cmpf of either uitofp or sitofp and a constant, attempt to canonicalize it to a cmpi.
This PR rewrites equivalent code within LLVM to now apply to MLIR arith.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117257
Casting between scalable vectors and fixed-length vectors doesn't make
sense. If one of the operands is scalable, the other has to be scalable
to be able to guarantee they have the same shape at runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119568
Following the discussion in D118318, mark `arith.addf/mulf` commutative.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118600
The bufferization of arith.constant ops is also switched over to BufferizableOpInterface-based bufferization. The old implementation is deleted. Both implementations utilize GlobalCreator, now renamed to just `getGlobalFor`.
GlobalCreator no longer maintains a set of all created allocations to avoid duplicate allocations of the same constant. Instead, `getGlobalFor` scans the module to see if there is already a global allocation with the same constant value.
For compatibility reasons, it is still possible to create a pass that bufferizes only `arith.constant`. This pass (createConstantBufferizePass) could be deleted once all users were switched over to One-Shot bufferization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118483
If any of the operands is NaN, return the operand instead of a new constant.
When the rhs operand is a constant, the second arith.cmpf+select ops will be folded away.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D117010 marks the two ops commutative, which will place the constant on the rhs.
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117011
This patch adds two folds. One for a repeated xor (e.g. xor(xor(x, a), a)) and one for a repeated trunc (e.g. trunc(trunc(x))).
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116383
Replace and(ext(a),ext(b)) with ext(and(a,b)). This both reduces one instruction, and results in the computation (and/or) being done on a smaller type.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116519
This patch creates folds for cmpi( ext(%x : i1, iN) != 0) -> %x
In essence this matches patterns matching an extension of a boolean, that != 0, which is equivalent to the original condition.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116504
With VectorType supporting scalable dimensions, we don't need many of
the operations currently present in ArmSVE, like mask generation and
basic arithmetic instructions. Therefore, this patch also gets
rid of those.
Having built-in scalable vector support also simplifies the lowering of
scalable vector dialects down to LLVMIR.
Scalable dimensions are indicated with the scalable dimensions
between square brackets:
vector<[4]xf32>
Is a scalable vector of 4 single precission floating point elements.
More generally, a VectorType can have a set of fixed-length dimensions
followed by a set of scalable dimensions:
vector<2x[4x4]xf32>
Is a vector with 2 scalable 4x4 vectors of single precission floating
point elements.
The scale of the scalable dimensions can be obtained with the Vector
operation:
%vs = vector.vscale
This change is being discussed in the discourse RFC:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-add-built-in-support-for-scalable-vector-types/4484
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111819
Following the example of `VectorOfAnyRankOf`, I've done a few changes in the
`.td` files to help with adding the support for the 0-D case gradually.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115220
The specific description is [[ https://llvm.discourse.group/t/adding-unsigned-integer-ceil-and-floor-in-std-dialect/4541 | Adding unsigned integer ceil in Std Dialect ]] .
When we lower ceilDivOp this will generate below code, sometimes we know m and n are unsigned intergal.Here are some redundant judgments about positive and negative.
So we need to add some unsigned operations to simplify the instructions.
```
ceilDiv(n, m)
x = (m > 0) ? -1 : 1
return (n*m>0) ? ((n+x) / m) + 1 : - (-n / m)
```
unsigned operations:
```
ceilDivU(n, m)
return n ==0 ? 0 : ((n - 1) / m) + 1
```
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113363
ConstantOp should be used instead of ConstantIntOp to be able to support index type.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112191
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
