Prior to this change there were a number of places where the allocation and deallocation of SparseTensorCOO objects were not cleanly paired, leading to inconsistencies regarding whether each function released its tensor/coo arguments or not, as well as making it easy to run afoul of memory leaks, use-after-free, or double-free errors. This change cleans up the codegen vs runtime boundary to resolve those issues. Now, the only time the runtime library frees an object is either (a) because it's a function explicitly designed to do so, or (b) because the allocated object is entirely local to the function and would be a memory leak if not released. Thus, now the codegen takes complete responsibility for releasing any objects it caused to be allocated.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122435
The revision removes the linalg.fill operation and renames the OpDSL generated linalg.fill_tensor operation to replace it. After the change, all named structured operations are defined via OpDSL and there are no handwritten operations left.
A side-effect of the change is that the pretty printed form changes from:
```
%1 = linalg.fill(%cst, %0) : f32, tensor<?x?xf32> -> tensor<?x?xf32>
```
changes to
```
%1 = linalg.fill ins(%cst : f32) outs(%0 : tensor<?x?xf32>) -> tensor<?x?xf32>
```
Additionally, the builder signature now takes input and output value ranges as it is the case for all other OpDSL operations:
```
rewriter.create<linalg::FillOp>(loc, val, output)
```
changes to
```
rewriter.create<linalg::FillOp>(loc, ValueRange{val}, ValueRange{output})
```
All other changes remain minimal. In particular, the canonicalization patterns are the same and the `value()`, `output()`, and `result()` methods are now implemented by the FillOpInterface.
Depends On D120726
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120728
Rationale:
Although file I/O is a bit alien to MLIR itself, we provide two convenient ways
for sparse tensor I/O. The input part was already there (behind the swiss army
knife sparse_tensor.new). Now we have a sparse_tensor.out to write out data. As
before, the ops are kept vague and may change in the future. For now this
allows us to compare TACO vs MLIR very easily.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117850
This revision implements sparse outputs (from scratch) in all cases where
the loops can be reordered with all but one parallel loops outer. If the
inner parallel loop appears inside one or more reductions loops, then an
access pattern expansion is required (aka. workspaces in TACO speak).
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115091
This revision contains all "sparsification" ops and rewriting necessary to support sparse output tensors when the kernel has no reduction (viz. insertions occur in lexicographic order and are "injective"). This will be later generalized to allow reductions too. Also, this first revision only supports sparse 1-d tensors (viz. vectors) as output in the runtime support library. This will be generalized to n-d tensors shortly. But this way, the revision is kept to a manageable size.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113705
Even though tensor.cast is not part of the sparse tensor dialect,
it may be used to cast static dimension sizes to dynamic dimension
sizes for sparse tensors without changing the actual sparse tensor
itself. Those cases should be lowered properly when replacing sparse
tensor types with their opaque pointers. Likewise, no op sparse
conversions are handled by this revision in a similar manner.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112173
The current implementation used explicit index->int64_t casts for some, but
not all instances of passing values of type "index" in and from the sparse
support library. This revision makes the situation more consistent by
using new "index_t" type at all such places (which allows for less trivial
casting in the generated MLIR code). Note that the current revision still
assumes that "index" is 64-bit wide. If we want to support targets with
alternative "index" bit widths, we need to build the support library different.
But the current revision is a step forward by making this requirement explicit
and more visible.
Reviewed By: wrengr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112122
This revison lifts the artificial restriction on having exact matches between
source and destination type shapes. A static size may become dynamic. We still
reject changing a dynamic size into a static size to avoid the need for a
runtime "assert" on the conversion. This revision also refactors some of the
conversion code to share same-content buffers.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111915
Next step towards supporting sparse tensors outputs.
Also some minor refactoring of enum constants as well
as replacing tensor arguments with proper buffer arguments
(latter is required for more general sizes arguments for
the sparse_tensor.init operation, as well as more general
spares_tensor.convert operations later)
Reviewed By: wrengr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111771
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
We have several ways to materialize sparse tensors (new and convert) but no explicit operation to release the underlying sparse storage scheme at runtime (other than making an explicit delSparseTensor() library call). To simplify memory management, a sparse_tensor.release operation has been introduced that lowers to the runtime library call while keeping tensors, opague pointers, and memrefs transparent in the initial IR.
*Note* There is obviously some tension between the concept of immutable tensors and memory management methods. This tension is addressed by simply stating that after the "release" call, no further memref related operations are allowed on the tensor value. We expect the design to evolve over time, however, and arrive at a more satisfactory view of tensors and buffers eventually.
Bug:
http://llvm.org/pr52046
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111099
The sparse constant provides a constant tensor in coordinate format. We first split the sparse constant into a constant tensor for indices and a constant tensor for values. We then generate a loop to fill a sparse tensor in coordinate format using the tensors for the indices and the values. Finally, we convert the sparse tensor in coordinate format to the destination sparse tensor format.
Add tests.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110373
Rationale:
Passing in a pointer to the memref data in order to implement the
dense to sparse conversion was a bit too low-level. This revision
improves upon that approach with a cleaner solution of generating
a loop nest in MLIR code itself that prepares the COO object before
passing it to our "swiss army knife" setup. This is much more
intuitive *and* now also allows for dynamic shapes.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108491
Folding in the MLIR uses the order of the type directly
but folding in the underlying implementation must take
the dim ordering into account. These tests clarify that
behavior and verify it is done right.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108474
This shares more code with existing utilities. Also, to be consistent,
we moved dimension permutation on the DimOp to the tensor lowering phase.
This way, both pre-existing DimOps on sparse tensors (not likely but
possible) as well as compiler generated DimOps are handled consistently.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108309
Implements lowering dense to sparse conversion, for static tensor types only.
First step towards general sparse_tensor.convert support.
Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107681
* Split memref.dim into two operations: memref.dim and tensor.dim. Both ops have the same builder interface and op argument names, so that they can be used with templates in patterns that apply to both tensors and memrefs (e.g., some patterns in Linalg).
* Add constant materializer to TensorDialect (needed for folding in affine.apply etc.).
* Remove some MemRefDialect dependencies, make some explicit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105165
Slowly we are moving toward full support of sparse tensor *outputs*. First
step was support for all-dense annotated "sparse" tensors. This step adds
support for truly sparse tensors, but only for operations in which the values
of a tensor change, but not the nonzero structure (this was refered to as
"simply dynamic" in the [Bik96] thesis).
Some background text was posted on discourse:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/sparse-tensors-in-mlir/3389/25
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104577
This is a very careful start with alllowing sparse tensors at the
left-hand-side of tensor index expressions (viz. sparse output).
Note that there is a subtle difference between non-annotated tensors
(dense, remain n-dim, handled by classic bufferization) and all-dense
annotated "sparse" tensors (linearized to 1-dim without overhead
storage, bufferized by sparse compiler, backed by runtime support library).
This revision gently introduces some new IR to facilitate annotated outputs,
to be generalized to truly sparse tensors in the future.
Reviewed By: gussmith23, bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104074
This revision completes the "dimension ordering" feature
of sparse tensor types that enables the programmer to
define a preferred order on dimension access (other than
the default left-to-right order). This enables e.g. selection
of column-major over row-major storage for sparse matrices,
but generalized to any rank, as in:
dimOrdering = affine_map<(i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p) -> (p,o,j,k,i,l,m,n)>
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102856
We are moving from just dense/compressed to more general dim level
types, so we need more than just an "i1" array for annotations.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102520
A very elaborate, but also very fun revision because all
puzzle pieces are finally "falling in place".
1. replaces lingalg annotations + flags with proper sparse tensor types
2. add rigorous verification on sparse tensor type and sparse primitives
3. removes glue and clutter on opaque pointers in favor of sparse tensor types
4. migrates all tests to use sparse tensor types
NOTE: next CL will remove *all* obsoleted sparse code in Linalg
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102095
This revision migrates more code from Linalg into the new permanent home of
SparseTensor. It replaces the test passes with proper compiler passes.
NOTE: the actual removal of the last glue and clutter in Linalg will follow
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101811
