This support has never really worked well, and is incredibly clunky to
use (it effectively creates two argument APIs), and clunky to generate (it isn't
clear how we should actually expose this from PDL frontends). Treating these
as just attribute arguments is much much cleaner in every aspect of the stack.
If we need to optimize lots of constant parameters, it would be better to
investigate internal representation optimizations (e.g. batch attribute creation),
that do not affect the user (we want a clean external API).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121569
PDLDialect being a somewhat user-facing dialect and whose ops contain exclusively other PDL ops in their regions can take advantage of `OpAsmOpInterface` to provide nicer IR.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117828
This change adds full python bindings for PDL, including types and operations
with additional mixins to make operation construction more similar to the PDL
syntax.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117458
