19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Louis Dionne
7b4622514d
[libc++] Fix missing and incorrect push/pop macros (#79204)
We recently noticed that the unwrap_iter.h file was pushing macros, but
it was pushing them again instead of popping them at the end of the
file. This led to libc++ basically swallowing any custom definition of
these macros in user code:

    #define min HELLO
    #include <algorithm>
    // min is not HELLO anymore, it's not defined

While investigating this issue, I noticed that our push/pop pragmas were
actually entirely wrong too. Indeed, instead of pushing macros like
`move`, we'd push `move(int, int)` in the pragma, which is not a valid
macro name. As a result, we would not actually push macros like `move`
-- instead we'd simply undefine them. This led to the following code not
working:

    #define move HELLO
    #include <algorithm>
    // move is not HELLO anymore

Fixing the pragma push/pop incantations led to a cascade of issues
because we use identifiers like `move` in a large number of places, and
all of these headers would now need to do the push/pop dance.

This patch fixes all these issues. First, it adds a check that we don't
swallow important names like min, max, move or refresh as explained
above. This is done by augmenting the existing
system_reserved_names.gen.py test to also check that the macros are what
we expect after including each header.

Second, it fixes the push/pop pragmas to work properly and adds missing
pragmas to all the files I could detect a failure in via the newly added
test.

rdar://121365472
2024-01-25 15:48:46 -05:00
Anton Rydahl
aea7929b0a
[libc++] Unify __is_trivial_equality_predicate and __is_trivial_plus_operation into __desugars_to (#68642)
When working on an OpenMP offloading backend for standard parallel
algorithms (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66968) we noticed
the need of a generalization of `__is_trivial_plus_operation`. This patch
merges `__is_trivial_equality_predicate` and `__is_trivial_plus_operation`
into `__desugars_to`, and in the future we might extend the latter to support
other binary operations as well.

Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
2023-11-23 13:55:55 -05:00
Anton Rydahl
f2b79ed9c6
[libcxx] Refactoring SIMD function names in PSTL CPU backend (#69029)
This PR addresses a smaller detail discussed in the code review for
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66968. Currently, some
functions in the `libc++` PSTL CPU backend have been appended with a
digit to indicate the number of input iterator arguments. However, there
is no need to change the name for each version as overloading can be
used instead. This PR will make the naming more consistent in the the
CPU and the proposed OpenMP backend.
2023-10-13 17:08:15 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
aade74675c [libc++][PSTL] Overhaul exceptions handling
This makes exception handling a lot simpler, since we don't have to convert any exceptions this way. Is also properly handles all the user-thrown exceptions.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154238
2023-10-06 23:01:30 +02:00
Nikolas Klauser
68b1035965 [libc++][PSTL] Add a __parallel_sort implementation to libdispatch
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155136
2023-08-15 12:20:40 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
051c863012 [libc++][PSTL] Simplify the partitioning algorithm until we have better data to know how to chunk better
The current chunking strategy is very bad for sorting, and we don't really know how to chunk in general. This fixes the performance problem for sorting.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155531
2023-08-14 16:44:30 -07:00
Gonzalo Brito Gadeschi
0e2de665f3 [libc++][PSTL] Parallelize random_access_iterator
P2408 requires this for C++23, but implementing it in C++20 is safe
because the only code impacted would be code that violated a
precondition of the parallel algorithm. It was P2408 intent to
enable implementations to backport this to C++20.

Closes #63447 .

Reviewed By: philnik, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154305
2023-08-07 17:58:27 +02:00
Louis Dionne
503f2ee4a8 [libc++] Make sure we use the libdispatch backend on Apple platforms
The Apple.cmake cache wasn't set up properly, so we wouldn't enable
the libdispatch backend by default on Apple platforms. This patch
fixes the issue and adds a test.

We also need to make various drive-by fixes:
- Drop the usage of std::vector in libdispatch.h to avoid changing
  the transitive includes only on Apple platforms.
- Fix includes
- Use __construct at since construct_at is unavailable in C++17
- Get rid of the (unused) __get_memory_resource function since that
  adds a back-deployment requirement and we don't use it right now.
- Fix bugs in the chunking logic around boundary conditions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155649
2023-07-20 15:53:27 -04:00
Nikolas Klauser
2b2e7f6e57 [libc++][PSTL] Add a GCD backend
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: arichardson, mgrang, krytarowski, libcxx-commits, h-vetinari

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151717
2023-07-12 13:27:33 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
a70ce8cb0e [libc++][PSTL] Fix double-move in std::transform_reduce
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Spies: h-vetinari, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154913
2023-07-12 08:56:10 -07:00
Nicole Rabjohn
92e4d6791f Fixing conflicting macro definitions between curses.h and the standard library.
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.

Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
2023-07-06 17:21:08 +00:00
Nikolas Klauser
d51a84b405 [libc++][PSTL] Implement std::stable_sort
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151573
2023-06-01 15:07:28 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
ee6ec2c5f1 [libc++][PSTL] Implement std::reduce and std::transform_reduce
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits, miyuki

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150736
2023-06-01 08:52:08 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
bf63b15bd4 [libc++][PSTL] Implement std::merge
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: pcwang-thead, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151375
2023-05-30 15:07:06 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
e837f4b7db [libc++][PSTL] Add a simple std::thread backend
This is just to test that the PSTL works with parallelization. This is not supposed to be a production-ready backend.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: EricWF, arichardson, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150284
2023-05-24 15:33:58 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
80643d9366 [libc++][NFC] Rename iterator category checks to make it obvious that they check //only// the iterator category
We plan to add concepts for checking that iterators actually provide what they claim to. This is to avoid people thinking that these type traits actually check the iterator requirements in more detail.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150801
2023-05-18 15:37:28 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
6851d078c5 [libc++][PSTL] Implement std::transform
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149615
2023-05-15 09:57:20 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
b97859b674 [libc++][PSTL] Move the already implemented functions to the new dispatching scheme
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: arichardson, pcwang-thead, libcxx-commits, miyuki

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150277
2023-05-12 13:11:16 -07:00
Louis Dionne
8e2d09c339 [libc++][PSTL] Add more specialized backend customization points
This allows backends to customize arbitrary parallel algorithms, which was requested pretty often.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Spies: arichardson, miyuki, crtrott, dalg24, __simt__, philnik, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149686
2023-05-11 13:54:28 -07:00