21 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexey Bataev
883571928c Revert "[SLP]Improve reductions analysis and emission, part 1."
This reverts commit 0e1f4d4d3cb08ff84df5adc4f5e41d0a2cebc53d to fix
a crash reported in PR54976
2022-04-19 06:17:03 -07:00
Alexey Bataev
0e1f4d4d3c [SLP]Improve reductions analysis and emission, part 1.
Currently SLP vectorizer walks through the instructions and selects
3 main classes of values: 1) reduction operations - instructions with same
reduction opcode (add, mul, min/max, etc.), which build the reduction,
2) reduced values - instructions with the same opcodes, but different
from the reduction opcode, 3) extra arguments - all other values,
instructions from the different basic block rather than the root node,
instructions with to many/less uses.

This scheme is not very efficient. It excludes some instructions and all
non-instruction values from the reductions (constants, proficient
gathers), to many possibly reduced values are marked as extra arguments.
Patch improves this process by introducing a bit extended analysis
stage. During this stage, we still try to select 3 classes of the
values: 1) reduction operations - same as before, 2) possibly reduced
values - all instructions from the current block/non-instructions, which
may build a vectorization tree, 3) extra arguments - instructions from
the different basic blocks. Additionally, an extra sorting of the
possibly reduced values occurs to build the scalar sequences which
highly likely will bed vectorized, e.g. loads are grouped by the
distance between them, constants are grouped together, cmp instructions
are sorted by their compare types and predicates, extractelement
instructions are sorted by the vector operand, etc. Also, these groups
are reordered by their length so the longest group is the first in the
list of the possibly reduced values.

The vectorization process tries to emit the reductions for all these
groups. These reductions, remaining non-vectorized possible reduced
values and extra arguments are then combined into the final expression
just like it was before.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114171
2022-04-12 17:46:11 -07:00
Philip Reames
7d6e8f2a96 [slp] Delete dead scalar instructions feeding vectorized instructions
If we vectorize a e.g. store, we leave around a bunch of getelementptrs for the individual scalar stores which we removed. We can go ahead and delete them as well.

This is purely for test output quality and readability. It should have no effect in any sane pipeline.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122493
2022-03-28 20:10:13 -07:00
Juneyoung Lee
278aa65cc4 [IR] Let IRBuilder's CreateVectorSplat/CreateShuffleVector use poison as placeholder
This patch updates IRBuilder to create insertelement/shufflevector using poison as a placeholder.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93793
2020-12-30 04:21:04 +09:00
Amara Emerson
322d0afd87 [llvm][mlir] Promote the experimental reduction intrinsics to be first class intrinsics.
This change renames the intrinsics to not have "experimental" in the name.

The autoupgrader will handle legacy intrinsics.

Relevant ML thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88787
2020-10-07 10:36:44 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
e50059f6b6 [x86] form reduction intrinsics from vectorizers instead of raw IR
Motivating examples are seen in the PhaseOrdering tests based on:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43953#c2 - if we have
intrinsics there, some pass can fold them.

The intrinsics are still named "experimental" at this point, but
if there is no fallout from this patch, that will be a good
indicator that it is safe to finalize them.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80867
2020-06-05 12:38:49 -04:00
Alexey Bataev
8b1eeafb91 [SLP] Fix for PR31847: Assertion failed: (isLoopInvariant(Operands[i], L) && "SCEVAddRecExpr operand is not loop-invariant!")
Initially SLP vectorizer replaced all going-to-be-vectorized
instructions with Undef values. It may break ScalarEvaluation and may
cause a crash.
Reworked SLP vectorizer so that it does not replace vectorized
instructions by UndefValue anymore. Instead vectorized instructions are
marked for deletion inside if BoUpSLP class and deleted upon class
destruction.

Reviewers: mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, davide, spatel

Subscribers: RKSimon, Gerolf, anemet, hans, majnemer, llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29641

llvm-svn: 373166
2019-09-29 14:18:06 +00:00
Jordan Rupprecht
f98d2c099a Revert [SLP] Fix for PR31847: Assertion failed: (isLoopInvariant(Operands[i], L) && "SCEVAddRecExpr operand is not loop-invariant!")
This reverts r372626 (git commit 6a278d9073bdc158d31d4f4b15bbe34238f22c18)

llvm-svn: 373019
2019-09-26 22:09:17 +00:00
Alexey Bataev
6a278d9073 [SLP] Fix for PR31847: Assertion failed: (isLoopInvariant(Operands[i], L) && "SCEVAddRecExpr operand is not loop-invariant!")
Summary:
Initially SLP vectorizer replaced all going-to-be-vectorized
instructions with Undef values. It may break ScalarEvaluation and may
cause a crash.
Reworked SLP vectorizer so that it does not replace vectorized
instructions by UndefValue anymore. Instead vectorized instructions are
marked for deletion inside if BoUpSLP class and deleted upon class
destruction.

Reviewers: mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, davide, spatel

Subscribers: RKSimon, Gerolf, anemet, hans, majnemer, llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29641

llvm-svn: 372626
2019-09-23 16:25:03 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
e6d1a80370 [SLPVectorizer][X86] Add other tests described in PR28474
llvm-svn: 362297
2019-06-01 12:35:03 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
2ef83571f2 [SLPVectorizer][X86] This test was from PR28474
llvm-svn: 362296
2019-06-01 12:10:29 +00:00
Eric Christopher
cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
ff3abef395 [SLPVectorizer] reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode - remove non-Instruction canonicalization
Remove attempts to commute non-Instructions to the LHS - the codegen changes appear to rely on chance more than anything else and also have a tendency to fight existing instcombine canonicalization which moves constants to the RHS of commutable binary ops.

This is prep work towards:
(a) reusing reorderInputsAccordingToOpcode for alt-shuffles and removing the similar reorderAltShuffleOperands
(b) improving reordering to optimized cases with commutable and non-commutable instructions to still find splat/consecutive ops.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59738

llvm-svn: 356913
2019-03-25 15:53:55 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein
5fb39a7966 [SLP] Revert everything that has to do with memory access sorting.
This reverts r293386, r294027, r294029 and r296411.

Turns out the SLP tree isn't actually a "tree" and we don't handle
accessing the same packet of loads in several different orders well,
causing miscompiles.

Revert until we can fix this properly.

llvm-svn: 297493
2017-03-10 18:59:07 +00:00
Alexey Bataev
dfec81107f [SLP] Fix for PR32038: extra add of PHI node when it is not required.
Summary:
If horizontal reduction tree starts from the binary operation that is
used in PHI node, but this PHI is not used in horizontal reduction, we
may end up with extra addition of this PHI node after vectorization.
Here is an example:
```
%phi = phi i32 [ %tmp, %end], ...
...
%tmp = add i32 %tmp1, %tmp2
end:
```
after vectorization we always have something like:

```
%phi = phi i32 [ %tmp, %end], ...
...
%red = extractelement <8 x 32> %vec.red, 0
%tmp = add i32 %red, %phi
end:
```
even if `%phi` is not used in reduction tree. Patch considers these PHI
nodes as extra arguments and considers them in the final result iff they
really used in reduction.

Reviewers: mkuper, hfinkel, mzolotukhin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30409

llvm-svn: 296606
2017-03-01 10:50:44 +00:00
Mohammad Shahid
3121334d32 [SLP] Vectorize loads of consecutive memory accesses, accessed in non-consecutive (jumbled) way.
The jumbled scalar loads will be sorted while building the tree and these accesses will be marked to generate shufflevector after the vectorized load with proper mask.

Reviewers: hfinkel, mssimpso, mkuper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26905

Change-Id: I9c0c8e6f91a00076a7ee1465440a3f6ae092f7ad
llvm-svn: 293386
2017-01-28 17:59:44 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
6cfb5caf05 Revert r290970 [SLPVectorizer] Regenerate test.
The check script will use var names before they are declared, which filecheck doesn't like.

llvm-svn: 290971
2017-01-04 16:12:07 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
4629b46bba [SLPVectorizer] Regenerate test.
Missed var name

llvm-svn: 290970
2017-01-04 16:01:55 +00:00
Mohammad Shahid
2f5cb60b07 [SLP] Add new and update existing lit testfor providing more context to incoming patch for vectorization of jumbled load
Change-Id: Ifb9091bb0f84c1937c2c8bd2fc345734f250d2f9
llvm-svn: 287992
2016-11-27 03:35:31 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein
38e7298093 [SLPVectorizer] Vectorize reverse-order loads in horizontal reductions
When vectorizing a tree rooted at a store bundle, we currently try to sort the
stores before building the tree, so that the stores can be vectorized. For other
trees, the order of the root bundle - which determines the order of all other
bundles - is arbitrary. That is bad, since if a leaf bundle of consecutive loads
happens to appear in the wrong order, we will not vectorize it.

This is partially mitigated when the root is a binary operator, by trying to
build a "reversed" tree when that's considered profitable. This patch extends the
workaround we have for binops to trees rooted in a horizontal reduction.

This fixes PR28474.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22554

llvm-svn: 276477
2016-07-22 21:28:48 +00:00