statement.
When an exported function would follow a class declaration, it would not
be recognized as a stand-alone function. That would then collapse the
following line with the current one, e.g.
class C {}
export function f() {} var x;
llvm-svn: 239592
In the long run, these two might be independent or we might to only
allow specific combinations. Until we have a corresponding request,
however, it is hard to do the right thing and choose the right
configuration options. Thus, just don't touch the options yet and
just modify the behavior slightly.
llvm-svn: 239531
The following example used to crash clang-format.
#define a\
/**/}
Adjusting the indentation level cache for the line starting with the
comment would lead to an out-of-bounds array read.
llvm-svn: 239521
Before clang-format would e.g. add a space into
#define Q_FOREACH(x, y)
which turns this into a non-function-like macro.
Patch by Strager Neds, thank you!
llvm-svn: 239513
assignments as enums.
Top level object literals are treated as enums, and their k/v pairs are put on
separate lines:
X.Y = {
A: 1,
B: 2
};
However assignments within blocks should not be affected:
function x() {
y = {a:1, b:2};
}
This change fixes the second case. Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 239462
I have not succeeded in writing a proper test case for this yet and we
also need to solve the underlying fundamental problem of trying too
many combinations with nested blocks (basically this somewhat works
around our Dijkstra algorithm). Preventing this linebreak is good
anyways as usually the penalties never make us choose it (that's why I
can't create a test) and it also looks ugly.
Also cleaned up state comparison code that I discovered while hunting
this down.
llvm-svn: 239398
Before:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t) -> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a)
.aaaaaaaa());
After:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t)
-> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a).aaaaaaaa());
Also add a test case for a difficult template parsing case I stumbled accross.
Needs fixing.
llvm-svn: 239149
This is a more correct representation than using "Equality" introduced
in r238942 which was a quick fix to solve an actual regression.
According to the typescript spec, arrows behave like "low-precedence"
assignments.
Before:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
After:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
llvm-svn: 239137
Before:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> =
[new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
llvm-svn: 238909
Before:
someFunction(() =>
{
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
After:
someFunction(() => {
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
This is still bad, but at least it is consistent with what we do for other
function literals. Added corresponding tests.
llvm-svn: 238736
Specifically adhere to LLVM Coding Standards (no 'else' after
return/break/continue) and remove yet another implementation of
paren counting. We already have enough of those in the
UnwrappedLineParser.
No functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 238672
method expressions and array literals. They should not bind stronger
than regular parentheses or the braces of braced lists.
Specific test case in JavaScript:
Before:
var aaaaa: List<
SomeThing> = [new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
llvm-svn: 238400
A definintion like this could not be formatted at all:
constructor({aa}: {
aa?: string,
aaaaaaaa?: string,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?: boolean,
aaaaaa?: List<string>
}) {
}
llvm-svn: 238291
instead of BinPackParameters. Braced lists are used as constructor
calls in many places and so the bin-packing should follow what is done
for other calls and not what is done for function declarations.
llvm-svn: 238184
Specifically, don't add a space before it.
Before:
someFunction(... a);
var x = [1, 2, ... a];
After:
someFunction(...a);
var x = [1, 2, ...a];
llvm-svn: 238183
This fixes a case where the column limit was incorrectly calculated
leading to a macro like this:
#define A \
[] { \
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx( \
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); \
}
exceeding the column limit.
llvm-svn: 238182
Assigns a token type (TT_JsFatArrow) to => tokens, and uses that to
more easily recognize and format fat arrow functions.
Improves function parsing to better recognize formal parameter
lists and return type declarations.
Recognizes arrow functions and parse function bodies as child blocks.
Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 237895
"void (*my_function)(void)" should become "void (*my_function) (void)" when
SpaceBeforeParens is set to 'Always'
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9835
llvm-svn: 237704
Before:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator I =
Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
After:
for (SmallVectorImpl<TemplateIdAnnotationn *>::iterator
I = Container.begin(),
E = Container.end();
I != E; ++I)
This fixes llvm.org/PR23544.
llvm-svn: 237688
Before:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.
aaaaaaaa];
After:
[call aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaa];
This merely papers over the fact that we aren't parsing ObjC method calls
correctly. Also, the indentation is weird.
llvm-svn: 237681
Before:
class C : test {
class D : test{void f(){int i{2};
}
}
;
}
;
After:
class C : test {
class D : test {
void f() { int i{2}; }
};
};
llvm-svn: 237569
Before:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa")
<< aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
After:
ASSERT("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa") << aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
<< bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb;
Also cleanup implementation a bit and only mark closing parenthesis of
these annotations.
llvm-svn: 237567
Generally, clang-format tries to keep label-value pairs on a single
line for stream operators. However, we should not do that if there is
just a single such pair, as that doesn't help much.
Before:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: " << aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaa);
After:
llvm::errs() << "aaaaaaaaaaaa: "
<< aaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa);
Also remove old test case that was testing actual behavior any more.
llvm-svn: 237535
comments. At some point, we might to want to a layout with a different
number of columns instead, but at the moment, this causes more
confusion than it's worth.
llvm-svn: 237427
