Summary:
Create diagnostic for function concept declaration which is not a
definition.
Create diagnostic for concept declaration which isn't in namespace
scope.
Create associated tests.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, fraggamuffin, hubert.reinterpretcast
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11027
Patch by Nathan Wilson!
llvm-svn: 242899
the identifier table. This is redundant, since the TU-scope lookups are also
serialized as part of the TU DeclContext, and wasteful in a number of ways. We
still emit the decls for PCH / preamble builds, since for those we want
identical results, not merely semantically equivalent ones.
llvm-svn: 242855
can be different from the normal variable maximum.
Add an error diagnostic for when TLS variables exceed maximum TLS alignment.
Currenty only PS4 sets an explicit maximum TLS alignment.
Patch by Charles Li!
llvm-svn: 242198
We referred to all declaration in definitions in our diagnostic messages
which is can be inaccurate. Instead, classify the declaration and emit
an appropriate diagnostic for the new declaration and an appropriate
note pointing to the old one.
This fixes PR24116.
llvm-svn: 242190
It's possible for TagRedeclarations to involve decls without a name,
ie, anonymous enums. We hit some undefined behaviour if we bind these
null names to the reference here.
We never dereference the name, so it's harmless if it's null - make it
a pointer to allow that.
Fixes the Modules/submodules-merge-defs.cpp test under ubsan.
llvm-svn: 241963
an existing using shadow declaration if they define entities of the same kind
in different namespaces.
We'd previously check this consistently if the using-declaration came after the
other declaration, but not if it came before.
llvm-svn: 241428
Addresses a conflict with glibc's __nonnull macro by renaming the type
nullability qualifiers as follows:
__nonnull -> _Nonnull
__nullable -> _Nullable
__null_unspecified -> _Null_unspecified
This is the major part of rdar://problem/21530726, but does not yet
provide the Darwin-specific behavior for the old names.
llvm-svn: 240596
Such conflicts are an accident waiting to happen, and this feature conflicts
with the desire to include existing headers into multiple modules and merge the
results. (In an ideal world, it should not be possible to export internal
linkage symbols from a module, but sadly the glibc and libstdc++ headers
provide 'static inline' functions in a few cases.)
llvm-svn: 240335
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
The same pattern was repeated a few times. Create a trivial helper method to
map the Type Specifier to an ID for the diagnostic. Flip the selection order on
one of the diagnostic messages to get the same ordering across all of the
messages. This makes the emission of the diagnostic slightly more legible by
changing the cascading ternary into a switch in a function. NFC.
llvm-svn: 240251
Introduce context-sensitive, non-underscored nullability specifiers
(nonnull, nullable, null_unspecified) for Objective-C method return
types, method parameter types, and properties.
Introduce Objective-C-specific semantics, including computation of the
nullability of the result of a message send, merging of nullability
information from the @interface of a class into its @implementation,
etc .
This is the Objective-C part of rdar://problem/18868820.
llvm-svn: 240154
Introduces the type specifiers __nonnull, __nullable, and
__null_unspecified that describe the nullability of the pointer type
to which the specifier appertains. Nullability type specifiers improve
on the existing nonnull attributes in a few ways:
- They apply to types, so one can represent a pointer to a non-null
pointer, use them in function pointer types, etc.
- As type specifiers, they are syntactically more lightweight than
__attribute__s or [[attribute]]s.
- They can express both the notion of 'should never be null' and
also 'it makes sense for this to be null', and therefore can more
easily catch errors of omission where one forgot to annotate the
nullability of a particular pointer (this will come in a subsequent
patch).
Nullability type specifiers are maintained as type sugar, and
therefore have no effect on mangling, encoding, overloading,
etc. Nonetheless, they will be used for warnings about, e.g., passing
'null' to a method that does not accept it.
This is the C/C++ part of rdar://problem/18868820.
llvm-svn: 240146
If definition of a class is unknown and out-of-line definition of its
member is encountered, do not parse the member declaration.
This change fixes PR18542.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8010
llvm-svn: 239483
it doesn't work correctly when a structure is declared before pragma
and then a function with the same name declared after pragma.
Patch by Andrey Bokhanko
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10187
llvm-svn: 239466
With this change, enabling -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility results in name
visibility rules being applied to submodules of the current module in addition
to imported modules (that is, names no longer "leak" between submodules of the
same top-level module). This also makes it much safer to textually include a
non-modular library into a module: each submodule that textually includes that
library will get its own "copy" of that library, and so the library becomes
visible no matter which including submodule you import.
llvm-svn: 237473
Previously we were setting LangOptions::GNUInline (which controls whether we
use traditional GNU inline semantics) if the language did not have the C99
feature flag set. The trouble with this is that C++ family languages also
do not have that flag set, so we ended up setting this flag in C++ modes
(and working around it in a few places downstream by also checking CPlusPlus).
The fix is to check whether the C89 flag is set for the target language,
rather than whether the C99 flag is cleared. This also lets us remove most
CPlusPlus checks. We continue to test CPlusPlus when deciding whether to
pre-define the __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__ macro for consistency with GCC.
There is a change in semantics in two other places
where we weren't checking both CPlusPlus and GNUInline
(FunctionDecl::doesDeclarationForceExternallyVisibleDefinition and
FunctionDecl::isInlineDefinitionExternallyVisible), but this change seems to
put us back into line with GCC's semantics (test case: test/CodeGen/inline.c).
While at it, forbid -fgnu89-inline in C++ modes, as GCC doesn't support it,
it didn't have any effect before, and supporting it just makes things more
complicated.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9333
llvm-svn: 237299
This is needed to prevent a TypoExpr from being corrected to a variable
when the TypoExpr is a subexpression of that variable's initializer.
Also exclude more keywords from the correction candidate pool when the
subsequent token is .* or ->* since keywords like "new" or "return"
aren't valid on the left side of those operators.
Fixes PR23140.
llvm-svn: 236519
It has no place there; it's not a property of the Module, and it makes
restoring the visibility set when we leave a submodule more difficult.
llvm-svn: 236300
Previously we'd try to perform checks on the captures from the middle of
parsing the lambda's body, at the point where we detected that a variable
needed to be captured. This was wrong in a number of subtle ways. In
PR23334, we couldn't correctly handle the list of potential odr-uses
resulting from the capture, and our attempt to recover from that resulted
in a use-after-free.
We now defer building the initialization expression until we leave the lambda
body and return to the enclosing context, where the initialization does the
right thing. This patch only covers lambda-expressions, but we should apply
the same change to blocks and captured statements too.
llvm-svn: 235921
During device-side CUDA compilation clang currently complains about
all TLS variables, regardless of whether they are __host__ or
__device__.
This patch suppresses "TLS unsupported" errors for host variables
during device compilation and for device variables during host
compilation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9269
llvm-svn: 235907
VerifyBitField must be called if we are to form a bitfield FieldDecl.
We will not verify the bitfield if the decl is known to be malformed in
other ways; pretend that we don't have a bitfield if this happens.
llvm-svn: 235816
Don't assume it's always is. This prevents a crash in Sema while
trying to merge return type for a builtin w/out function prototype.
PR: 23086
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9235
Reviewed by: rsmith
llvm-svn: 235806
We didn't correctly expect a QualifiedTypeLoc when faced with fixing a
variable array type into a constant array type.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8958
llvm-svn: 235251
The previous implementation would copy the attribute from the class to
functions that have the class as their return type when the functions
are first declared. This proved to have two flaws:
1) if the class is forward-declared without the attribute and a
function or method with the class as a its return type is declared,
and afterward the class is defined with warn_unused_result, the
function or method would never inherit the attribute, and
2) the check simply failed for functions and methods that are part of
a template instantiation, regardless of whether the class with
warn_unused_result is part of a specific instantiation or part of
the template itself (presumably because those function/method
declaration does not hit the same code path as a non-template one
and so never inherits the attribute).
The new approach is to instead modify the two places where a function or
method call is checked for the warn_unused_result attribute on the decl
by extending the checks to also look for the attribute on the decl's
return type.
Additionally, the check for return types that have the warn_unused_result
now excludes pointers and references to such types, as such return types do
not necessarily imply a transfer of ownership for the underlying object
being referred to by the return value. This does not change the behavior
of functions that are directly given the warn_unused_result attribute.
llvm-svn: 234526
