class declaration which forces any such class and any
class that inherits from such a class to have their
typeinfo symbols be marked as weak.
// rdar://10246395
A test/CodeGenCXX/weak-extern-typeinfo.cpp
M lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
M lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
M lib/CodeGen/CGRTTI.cpp
llvm-svn: 142693
shadows a template parameter. Complain about the shadowing (or not,
under -fms-extensions), but don't invalidate the declaration. Merely
forget about the template parameter declaration.
llvm-svn: 142596
actually just has an extraneous 'template<>' header, strip off the
'template<>' header and treat it as a normal friend tag. Fixes PR10660
/ <rdar://problem/9958322>.
llvm-svn: 142587
- Remodel Expr::EvaluateAsInt to behave like the other EvaluateAs* functions,
and add Expr::EvaluateKnownConstInt to capture the current fold-or-assert
behaviour.
- Factor out evaluation of bitfield bit widths.
- Fix a few places which would evaluate an expression twice: once to determine
whether it is a constant expression, then again to get the value.
llvm-svn: 141561
constexpr constructor templates. Such checking is optional, and currently hard
to get right since clang doesn't generate implicit member initializers until
instantiation (even for non-dependent members).
This is needed for clang to accept libstdc++ from g++4.6 in c++0x mode.
llvm-svn: 141547
initializer to update the type of the declaration. For example, this
allows us to determine the size of an incomplete array from its
initializer. Fixes PR10288.
llvm-svn: 141543
Begin with just default constructors. One note is that as a side effect
of this, a conformance test was removed on the basis that this is almost
certainly a defect as with most of union initialization. As it is, clang
does not implement union initialization close to the standard as it's
quite broken as written. I hope to write a paper addressing the issues
eventually.
llvm-svn: 141528
part on patches by Peter Collingbourne.
We diverge from the C++11 standard in a few areas, mostly related to checking
constexpr function declarations, and not just definitions. See WG21 paper
N3308=11-0078 for details.
Function invocation substitution is not available in this patch; constexpr
functions cannot yet be used from within constant expressions.
llvm-svn: 140926
We had an extension which allowed const static class members of floating-point type to have in-class initializers, 'as a C++0x extension'. However, C++0x does not allow this. The extension has been kept, and extended to all literal types in C++0x mode (with a fixit to add the 'constexpr' specifier).
llvm-svn: 140801
the information on to Sema. There's still an incorrectness in the way template instantiation
works now, but that is due to a far larger underlying representational problem.
Also add a test case for various list initialization cases of scalars, which test this
commit as well as the previous one.
llvm-svn: 140460
the key function is inline, rather than the original
declaration. Perhaps FunctionDecl::isInlined() is poorly named. Fixes
<rdar://problem/9979458>.
llvm-svn: 140400
generation when we're dealing with an implicitly-defined copy or move
constructor. And, actually set the implicitly-defined bit for
implicitly-defined constructors and destructors. Should fix self-host.
llvm-svn: 140334
of false positive warnings that depend on noreturn destructors pruning
the CFGs, but only in C++0x mode!
This was really surprising as the debugger quickly reveals that the
attributes are parsed correctly (and using the same code) in both modes.
The warning fires in the same way in both modes. But between parsing and
building the destructor declaration with the noreturn attribute and the
warning, it magically disappears. The key? The 'noexcept' appears!
When we were rebuilding the destructor type with the computed implicit
noexcept we completely dropped the old type on the floor. This almost
makes sense (as the arguments and return type to a destructor aren't
exactly unpredictable), but lost any function type attributes as well.
The fix is simple, we build the new type off of the old one rather than
starting fresh.
Testing this is a bit awkward. I've done it by running the
noreturn-sensitive tests in both modes, which previous failed and now
passes, but if anyone has ideas about how to more specifically and
thoroughly test that the extended info on a destructor is preserved when
adding noexcept, I'm all ears.
llvm-svn: 140138
synthesized move assignment within an implicitly-defined move
assignment operator, be sure to treat the derived-to-base cast as an
xvalue (rather than an lvalue). Otherwise, we'll end up getting the
wrong constructor.
Optimize a direct call to a trivial move assignment operator to an
aggregate copy, as we do for trivial copy assignment operators, and
update the the assertion in CodeGenFunction::EmitAggregateCopy() to
cope with this optimization.
Fixes PR10860.
llvm-svn: 139143
well.
Also, clean up the flow of the code a bit, and factor things more
nicely.
Finally, add the test case that was missing from my previous
commit (sorry), with new tests added to cover temporaries and other fun
cases.
llvm-svn: 139077
reference members of classes. We've had several bugs reported because of
this, and there's no reason not to flag it right away in the compiler.
Comments especially welcome on the strategy for implementing this
warning (IE, what should trigger this?) and on the text of the warning
itself.
I'm going to extend this to cover obvious cases with temporaries and
beef up the test cases some in subsequent patches. I'll then run it over
a large codebase and make sure its not misbehaving before I add it to
-Wall or turn it on by default. I think this one might be a good
candidate for on by default.
llvm-svn: 139075
