The regression test is reduced from the example shown in D56281.
This does raise a question as noted in the test file: do we want
to handle this pattern? I don't have a motivating example for
that on x86 yet, but it seems like we could have that pattern
there too, so we could avoid the back-and-forth using a shuffle.
llvm-svn: 351753
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This patch makes some changes related to -dag-dump-verbose.
Main use case has been when debugging how SelectionDAG is
dealing with debug info (SDDbgValue nodes).
1) We now print the number of DbgValues that are mapped to each
SDNode.
2) Removed duplicated printing of DebugLoc (nowadays DebugLoc is
printed also when not using -dag-dump-verbose).
3) Renamed SDDbgValue::dump to SDDbgValue::print, and added a
new SDDbgValue::dump that will start a new line after calling
print.
4) SDDbgValue::print now prints "Order", and it also prints
some additional information when kind is CONST/FRAMEIX/VREG.
5) SelectionDAG::dump() now dumps all SDDbgValue nodes after
the list of SDNodes (both "regular" and "ByVal" SDDbgValue:s).
Invalidated nodes are not printed.
6) Prohibit inline printing of SDNode operands that has SDDbgValue
nodes associated to them.
Reviewers: jmorse, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56793
llvm-svn: 351581
Similar to D55073. Without this change, the DAG combiner crashes on code
with more than 64k of stores in a single basic block that form parallelizable
chains.
No test case, as it would be very IR file.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56740
llvm-svn: 351571
Defer inline asm's output fixup work until after we've generated the
inline asm node itself. Remove StoresToEmit, IndirectStoresToEmit, and
RetValRegs in favor of using ConstraintOperands.
llvm-svn: 351558
This functionality is required at multiple places which potentially
create large operand lists, like SelectionDAGBuilder or DAGCombiner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56739
llvm-svn: 351552
Summary:
Use this helper to make sure we use the same value at various places.
This will likely be needed at more places were we currently crash
because we use more operands than possible.
Also makes it easier to change in the future.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, efriedma, aemerson
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56859
llvm-svn: 351537
We should not pre-scheduled the node has ADJCALLSTACKDOWN parent,
or else, when bottom-up scheduling, ADJCALLSTACKDOWN and
ADJCALLSTACKUP may hold CallResource too long and make other
calls can't be scheduled. If there's no other available node
to schedule, the scheduler will try to rename the register by
creating copy to avoid the conflict which will fail because
CallResource is not a real physical register.
llvm-svn: 351527
Summary:
This patch supports MS SEH extensions __try/__except/__finally. The intrinsics localescape and localrecover are responsible for communicating escaped static allocas from the try block to the handler.
We need to preserve frame pointers for SEH. So we create a new function/property HasLocalEscape.
Reviewers: rnk, compnerd, mstorsjo, TomTan, efriedma, ssijaric
Reviewed By: rnk, efriedma
Subscribers: smeenai, jrmuizel, alex, majnemer, ssijaric, ehsan, dmajor, kristina, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, chrib, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53540
llvm-svn: 351370
dbg.value intrinsics can appear in blocks where their operand is not used,
meaning the operand never receives an SDNode, and thus no DBG_VALUE will
be created. Get around this by looking to see whether the operand has already
been allocated a virtual register. This allows dbg.values of Phi node and
Values that are used across basic blocks to successfully be translated into
DBG_VALUEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56678
llvm-svn: 351358
The value returned by max() is the last valid value, adjust the
comparison accordingly.
The code added in D55073 creates TokenFactors with max() operands.
Reviewers: aemerson, efriedma, RKSimon, craig.topper
Reviewed By: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56738
llvm-svn: 351318
ReduceLoadWidth can trigger using a shifted mask is used and this
requires that the function return a shl node to correct for the
offset. However, the way that this was implemented meant that the
returned result could be an existing node, which would be incorrect.
This fixes the method of inserting the new node and replacing uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50432
llvm-svn: 351310
The motivating case for this is shown in the first regression test. We are
transferring to scalar and back rather than just zero-extending with 'vpmovzxdq'.
That's a special-case for a more general pattern as shown here. In all tests,
we're avoiding the vector-scalar-vector moves in favor of vector ops.
We aren't producing optimal shuffle code in some cases though, so the patch is
limited to reduce regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56281
llvm-svn: 351198
I accidentally triggered this code while doing some experiments and it doesn't look lke it could possibly work.
It calls 'getNOT' on a node that should be a CondCode.
I think to do this right we would need to swap the branch target and the fallthrough target. But that's not easy to do. Or we could create an explicit SetCC and feed that into a new BR_CC?
llvm-svn: 351022
This pattern:
t33: v8i32 = insert_subvector undef:v8i32, t35, Constant:i64<0>
t21: v16i32 = insert_subvector undef:v16i32, t33, Constant:i64<0>
...shows up in PR33758:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33758
...although this patch doesn't make any difference to the final result on that yet.
In the affected tests here, it looks like it just makes RA wiggle. But we might
as well squash this to prevent it interfering with other pattern-matching.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56604
llvm-svn: 351008
This patch takes some of the code from D49837 to allow us to enable ISD::ABS support for all SSE vector types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56544
llvm-svn: 350998
Summary:
When legalizing the result of a SELECT_CC node by promoting the
floating-point type, use the promoted-to type rather than the original
type.
Fix PR40273.
Reviewers: efriedma, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56566
llvm-svn: 350951
That is, remove many of the calls to Type::getNumContainedTypes(),
Type::subtypes(), and Type::getContainedType(N).
I'm not intending to remove these accessors -- they are
useful/necessary in some cases. However, removing the pointee type
from pointers would potentially break some uses, and reducing the
number of calls makes it easier to audit.
llvm-svn: 350835
This removes check for single use from general ShrinkDemandedConstant
to the BE because of the AArch64 regression after D56289/rL350475.
After several hours of experiments I did not come up with a testcase
failing on any other targets if check is not performed.
Moreover, direct call to ShrinkDemandedConstant is not really needed
and superceed by SimplifyDemandedBits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56406
llvm-svn: 350684
As we saw in D56057 when we tried to use this function on X86, it's unsafe. It allows the operand node to have multiple users, but doesn't prevent recursing past the first node when it does have multiple users. This can cause other simplifications earlier in the graph without regard to what bits are needed by the other users of the first node. Ideally all we should do to the first node if it has multiple uses is bypass it when its not needed by the user we started from. Doing any other transformation that SimplifyDemandedBits can do like turning ZEXT/SEXT into AEXT would result in an increase in instructions.
Fortunately, we already have a function that can do just that, GetDemandedBits. It will only make transformations that involve bypassing a node.
This patch changes AMDGPU's simplifyI24, to use a combination of GetDemandedBits to handle the multiple use simplifications. And then uses the regular SimplifyDemandedBits on each operand to handle simplifications allowed when the operand only has a single use. Unfortunately, GetDemandedBits simplifies constants more aggressively than SimplifyDemandedBits. This caused the -7 constant in the changed test to be simplified to remove the upper bits. I had to modify computeKnownBits to account for this by ignoring the upper 8 bits of the input.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56087
llvm-svn: 350560
The FSHL/FSHR nodes are handled in the expand function, but they need to also be listed in the code that queries for the operation action too.
llvm-svn: 350490
Fixes cvt_f32_ubyte combine. performCvtF32UByteNCombine() could shrink
source node to demanded bits only even if there are other uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56289
llvm-svn: 350475
This adds support for calculating sign bits of insert_subvector. I based it on the computeKnownBits.
My motivating case is propagating sign bits information across basic blocks on AVX targets where concatenating using insert_subvector is common.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56283
llvm-svn: 350432
As noted in PR39973 and D55558:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39973
...this is a partial implementation of a fold that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine:
// extelt (binop X, Y), Index --> binop (extelt X, Index), (extelt Y, Index)
We want to have this in the DAG too because as we can see in some of the test diffs (reductions),
the pattern may not be visible in IR.
Given that this is already an IR canonicalization, any backend that would prefer a vector op over
a scalar op is expected to already have the reverse transform in DAG lowering (not sure if that's
a realistic expectation though). The transform is limited with a TLI hook because there's an
existing transform in CodeGenPrepare that tries to do the opposite transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55722
llvm-svn: 350354
Currently we expand the two nodes separately. This gives DAG combiner an opportunity to optimize the expanded sequence taking into account only one set of users. When we expand the other node we'll create the expansion again, but might not be able to optimize it the same way. So the nodes won't CSE and we'll have two similarish sequences in the same basic block. By expanding both nodes at the same time we'll avoid prematurely optimizing the expansion until both the division and remainder have been replaced.
Improves the test case from PR38217. There may be additional opportunities after this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56145
llvm-svn: 350239
By also promoting the input type we get a better idea for what scalar type to use. This can provide better results if the result of the extract is sign extended. What was previously happening is that the extract result would be legalized, sometime later the input of the sign extend would be legalized using the result of the extract. Then later the extract input would be legalized forcing a truncate into the input of the sign extend using a replace all uses. This requires DAG combine to combine out the sext/truncate pair. But sometimes we visited the truncate first and messed things up before the sext could be combined.
By creating the extract with the correct scalar type when we create legalize the result type, the truncate will be added right away. Then when the sign_extend input is legalized it will create an any_extend of the truncate which can be optimized by getNode to maybe remove the truncate. And then a sign_extend_inreg. Now DAG combine doesn't have to worry about getting rid of the extend.
This fixes the regression on X86 in D56156.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56176
llvm-svn: 350236
If x has multiple sign bits than it doesn't matter which one we extend from so we can sext from x's msb instead.
The X86 setcc-combine.ll changes are a little weird. It appears we ended up with a (sext_inreg (aext (trunc (extractelt)))) after type legalization. The sext_inreg+aext now gets optimized by this combine to leave (sext (trunc (extractelt))). Then we visit the trunc before we visit the sext. This ends up changing the truncate to an extractvectorelt from a bitcasted vector. I have a follow up patch to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56156
llvm-svn: 350235
