charN_t represent code units of different UTF encodings. Therefore the
values of 2 different charN_t objects do not represent the same
characters.
In order to avoid comparing apples and oranges, we add new warnings to
warn on:
- Implicit conversions
- Comparisons
- Other cases involving arithmetic conversions
We only produce the warning if we cannot establish the comparison would
be safe through constant evaluation.
The new `-Wimplicit-unicode-conversion` warning is enabled by default.
Note that this PR intentionally doesn;t touches char/wchar_t, but it
would be worth considering also warning on extending the new warnings to
these types (in a follow up)
Additionally most arithmetic operations on charN_t don't really make
sense (ie what does it mean to addition code units), so we could add
warnings for that.
Fixes#138526
This PR fixes an ambiguous call encountered when using the `std::ranges::find` or `std::find`
algorithms with `vector<bool>` with small `allocator_traits::size_type`s, an issue reported
in #122528. The ambiguity arises from integral promotions during the internal bitwise
arithmetic of the `find` algorithms when applied to `vector<bool>` with small integral
`size_type`s. This leads to multiple viable candidates for small integral types:
__libcpp_ctz(unsigned), __libcpp_ctz(unsigned long), and __libcpp_ctz(unsigned long long),
none of which represent a single best viable match, resulting in an ambiguous call error.
To resolve this, we propose invoking an internal function __countr_zero as a dispatcher
that directs the call to the appropriate overload of __libcpp_ctz. Necessary amendments
have also been made to __countr_zero.
libc++ currently has very limited test coverage for `std::ranges{fill, fill_n, find}`
with `vector<bool>::iterator` optimizations. Specifically, the existing tests for
`std::ranges::fill` only covers cases of 1 - 2 bytes, which is merely 1/8 to 1/4
of the `__storage_type` word size. This renders the tests insufficient to validate
functionality for whole words, with or without partial words (which necessitates at
least 8 bytes of data). Moreover, no tests were provided for `ranges::{find, fill_n}`
with `vector<bool>::iterator` optimizations. This PR fills in the gap.
There were various places where we incorrectly handled exceptions in the
PSTL. Typical issues were missing `noexcept` and taking iterators by
value instead of by reference.
This patch fixes those inconsistent and incorrect instances, and adds
proper tests for all of those. Note that the previous tests were often
incorrectly turned into no-ops by the compiler due to copy ellision,
which doesn't happen with these new tests.
* `libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.find/find.pass.cpp`
emits a bunch of warnings, all caused by what appears to be intentional
code:
+ Silence MSVC warning C4245: conversion from `'int'` to `'wchar_t'`,
signed/unsigned mismatch
- Caused by: `test<U>(0, -1);`
+ Silence MSVC warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from `'int'` to
`'bool'`
- Caused by: `test<U>(0, -1);`
+ Silence MSVC warning C4310: cast truncates constant value
- Caused by: `test<U>(T(-129), U(-129));`
+ Silence MSVC warning C4805: `'=='`: unsafe mix of type `'char'` and
type `'bool'` in operation
- Caused by: `bool expect_match = val == to_find;`
*
`libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.fold/left_folds.pass.cpp`
+ Silence MSVC warning C4244: 'argument': conversion from `'double'` to
`'const int'`, possible loss of data
- Caused by `[](int const x, double const y) { return x + y; }`
deliberately being given `double`s to truncate.
*
`libcxx/test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/numeric.ops.midpoint/midpoint.pointer.pass.cpp`
+ Silence MSVC warnings about C++20 deprecated `volatile`.
- Caused by: `runtime_test< volatile T>();`
Previously there were two ways to override the verbose abort function
which gets called when a hardening assertion is triggered:
- compile-time: define the `_LIBCPP_VERBOSE_ABORT` macro;
- link-time: provide a definition of `__libcpp_verbose_abort` function.
This patch adds a new configure-time approach: the vendor can provide
a path to a custom header file which will get copied into the build by
CMake and included by the library. The header must provide a definition
of the
`_LIBCPP_ASSERTION_HANDLER` macro which is what will get called should
a hardening assertion fail. As of this patch, overriding
`_LIBCPP_VERBOSE_ABORT` will still work, but the previous mechanisms
will be effectively removed in a follow-up patch, making the
configure-time mechanism the sole way of overriding the default handler.
Note that `_LIBCPP_ASSERTION_HANDLER` only gets invoked when a hardening
assertion fails. It does not affect other cases where
`_LIBCPP_VERBOSE_ABORT` is currently used (e.g. when an exception is
thrown in the `-fno-exceptions` mode).
The library provides a default version of the custom header file that
will get used if it's not overridden by the vendor. That allows us to
always test the override mechanism and reduces the difference in
configuration between the pristine version of the library and
a platform-specific version.
This is the last PR that's needed (for now) to get libc++'s tests
working with MSVC's STL.
The ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS machinery is very useful, but also very
problematic for MSVC, as it doesn't understand most of Clang's compiler
options. We've been dealing with this by simply marking anything that
uses ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS as FAIL or SKIPPED, but that creates
significant gaps in test coverage.
Fortunately, ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS also supports "features", which
can be slightly enhanced to send Clang-compatible and MSVC-compatible
options to the right compilers.
This patch adds the gcc-style-warnings and cl-style-warnings Lit features,
and uses that to pass the appropriate warning flags to tests. It also uses
TEST_MEOW_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORED for a few local suppressions of MSVC
warnings.
Before this patch, we would fail to implicitly convert the result of
predicates to bool, which means we'd potentially perform a copy or move
construction of the boolean-testable, which isn't allowed. The same
holds true for comparing iterators against sentinels, which is allowed
to return a boolean-testable type.
We already had tests aiming to ensure correct handling of these types,
but they failed to provide appropriate coverage in several cases due to
guaranteed RVO. This patch fixes the tests, adds tests for missing
algorithms and views, and fixes the actual problems in the code.
Fixes#69074
This makes exception handling a lot simpler, since we don't have to convert any exceptions this way. Is also properly handles all the user-thrown exceptions.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154238
This also removes some tests which we have grouped together into robust_from_*.pass.cpp tests.
Specifically, checking that
- `ranges::dangling` is returned is done in `libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_dangling.pass.cpp`
- `std::invoke` is used is done in `libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_omitting_invoke.pass.cpp`.
- implicit conversion to bool works is done in `libcxx/test/std/algorithms/ranges_robust_against_nonbool_predicates.pass.cpp`
Checking the comparison order is invalid because the `operator==` isn't symmetric.
Checking what the exact type of `operator==` is, is invalid because comparing the same object has to yield the same results if the objects are not modified.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150588
This removes the need for a custom libc++ build to have a basic set of PSTL algorithms.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: miyuki, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149624
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
