We recently noticed that the unwrap_iter.h file was pushing macros, but
it was pushing them again instead of popping them at the end of the
file. This led to libc++ basically swallowing any custom definition of
these macros in user code:
#define min HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// min is not HELLO anymore, it's not defined
While investigating this issue, I noticed that our push/pop pragmas were
actually entirely wrong too. Indeed, instead of pushing macros like
`move`, we'd push `move(int, int)` in the pragma, which is not a valid
macro name. As a result, we would not actually push macros like `move`
-- instead we'd simply undefine them. This led to the following code not
working:
#define move HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// move is not HELLO anymore
Fixing the pragma push/pop incantations led to a cascade of issues
because we use identifiers like `move` in a large number of places, and
all of these headers would now need to do the push/pop dance.
This patch fixes all these issues. First, it adds a check that we don't
swallow important names like min, max, move or refresh as explained
above. This is done by augmenting the existing
system_reserved_names.gen.py test to also check that the macros are what
we expect after including each header.
Second, it fixes the push/pop pragmas to work properly and adds missing
pragmas to all the files I could detect a failure in via the newly added
test.
rdar://121365472
This makes exception handling a lot simpler, since we don't have to convert any exceptions this way. Is also properly handles all the user-thrown exceptions.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154238
The _LIBCPP_PSTL_CUSTOMIZATION_POINT macro was assuming that the policy
was called _RawPolicy and referencing it by name. It happened to always
work but this was definitely accidental and an oversight in the original
implementation. This patch fixes that by passing the policy to the macro
explicitly. Noticed while reviewing #66968.
P2408 requires this for C++23, but implementing it in C++20 is safe
because the only code impacted would be code that violated a
precondition of the parallel algorithm. It was P2408 intent to
enable implementations to backport this to C++20.
Closes#63447 .
Reviewed By: philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154305
Those were found while trying to enable configurations like no-threads
and no-localization with Clang modules enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153977
We plan to add concepts for checking that iterators actually provide what they claim to. This is to avoid people thinking that these type traits actually check the iterator requirements in more detail.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150801
