eg: t1<void () const> - DWARF doesn't have a particularly nice way to
encode this, for real member function types (like `void (t1::*)()
const`) the const-ness is encoded in the type of the artificial first
parameter. But `void () const` has no parameters, so encode it like a
normal const-qualified type, using DW_TAG_const_type. (similarly for
restrict and volatile)
Reference qualifiers (& and &&) coming in a separate commit shortly.
Currently, we have no front-end type for ppc_fp128 type in IR. PowerPC
target generates ppc_fp128 type from long double now, but there's option
(-mabi=(ieee|ibm)longdouble) to control it and we're going to do
transition from IBM extended double-double ppc_fp128 to IEEE fp128 in
the future.
This patch adds type __ibm128 which always represents ppc_fp128 in IR,
as what GCC did for that type. Without this type in Clang, compilation
will fail if compiling against future version of libstdcxx (which uses
__ibm128 in headers).
Although all operations in backend for __ibm128 is done by software,
only PowerPC enables support for it.
There's something not implemented in this commit, which can be done in
future ones:
- Literal suffix for __ibm128 type. w/W is suitable as GCC documented.
- __attribute__((mode(IF))) should be for __ibm128.
- Complex __ibm128 type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
I discovered this quirk when working on some DWARF - AST printing prints
type template parameters fully qualified, but printed template template
parameters the way they were written syntactically, or wholely
unqualified - instead, we should print them consistently with the way we
print type template parameters: fully qualified.
The one place this got weird was for partial specializations like in
ast-print-temp-class.cpp - hence the need for checking for
TemplateNameDependenceScope::DependentInstantiation template template
parameters. (not 100% sure that's the right solution to that, though -
open to ideas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108794
Streamline template arguments across types, variables, and functions -
for convenient reuse in experiments related to template argument list
reconstitution (not including template argument lists in the "name" of
those entities, and leaving it to debug info consumers to rebuild the
full template name from the semantic descriptions of the argument lists)
But the change seems like a good refactoring/cleanup anyway.
I'd certainly be open to suggestions about how this might be more
streamlined - like is there no generic way to query template argument
lists across the 3 kinds of entities, rather than needing special case
code?
Extend the information preserved in `TypeInfo` by replacing the `AlignIsRequired` bool flag with a three-valued enum, the enum also indicates where the alignment attribute come from, which could be helpful in determining whether the attribute should overrule.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108858
Generate btf_tag annotations for DILocalVariable. The annotations
are represented as an DINodeArray in DebugInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106620
Generate btf_tag annotations for DIGlobalVariable. The annotations
are represented as an DINodeArray in DebugInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106619
Generate btf_tag annotations for DISubprograms. The annotations
are represented as an DINodeArray in DebugInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106618
Generate btf_tag annotations for record fields. The annotations
are represented as an DINodeArray in DebugInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106616
Clang patch D106614 added attribute btf_tag support. This patch
generates btf_tag annotations for DIComposite types.
Each btf_tag annotation is represented as a 2D array of
meta strings. Each record may have more than one
btf_tag annotations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106615
Allegedly the DWARF backend ignores this field of DIEnumerator, but we
set it nonetheless in case we decide to use it in the future.
Alternatively, we could remove it, but it is simpler to pass down the
signed bit as it is in the AST for now.
Implemented to address comments on D106585
DIEnumerator stores an APInt as of April 2020, so now we don't need to
truncate the enumerator value to 64 bits. Fixes assertions during IRGen.
Split from D105320, thanks to Matheus Izvekov for the test case and
report.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106585
It's noteworthy that GCC has the same bug here, which is a bit
surprising. Both Clang and GCC's bug is only for function template
arguments that are themselves templates with default template arguments
(f1<t1<int[, missing_default_here]>>). Probably because function name
matching isn't generally necessary - whereas type matching is necessary
for DWARF consumers to associate declarations and definitions across
translation units, so the bug's been addressed there already - but
continued to exist for function templates since it's fairly benign
there.
I came across this while working on a change that could reconstitute
these pretty printed names based on the rest of the DWARF, reducing the
size of the DWARF by not having to encode all the template parameters in
the name string. That reconstitution code can't tell the difference
between a defaulted argument or not, so couldn't create the current
buggy-ish output.
Making the names more consistent between direct and indirect references,
and between function and class templates seems all to the good.
(I fixed the function template version of this a few years back in
9fdd09a4ccd01feb8e00be22b17e944e46807746 - clearly I should've looked
more closely and generalized the code better so it only had to be fixed
once - well, doing that here now)
This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
This fixes a gap in the `overloadable` attribute support (K&R declared
functions would get mangled symbol names, but that name wouldn't be
represented in the debug info linkage name field for the function) and
in -funique-internal-linkage-names (this came up in review discussion on
D98799) where K&R static declarations would not get the uniqued linkage
names.
Note regarding C++ for OpenCL:
When compiling C++ for OpenCL, DW_LANG_C_plus_plus* is emitted.
There is no DWARF language code defined for C++ for OpenCL as of yet,
but DWARF issue 210514.1 has been raised to request one.
In the mean time, continuing to emit DW_LANG_C_plus_plus* for C++ for
OpenCL allows the potential to distinguish between C++ for OpenCL and
OpenCL C in !DICompileUnit nodes, whereas using DW_LANG_OpenCL for
C++ for OpenCL would prevent this.
This change therefore leaves C++ for OpenCL as-is.
Reviewed By: shchenz, Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104118
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This is a pre-patch for adding using-enum support. It breaks out
the shadow decl handling of UsingDecl to a new intermediate base
class, BaseUsingDecl, altering the decl hierarchy to
def BaseUsing : DeclNode<Named, "", 1>;
def Using : DeclNode<BaseUsing>;
def UsingPack : DeclNode<Named>;
def UsingShadow : DeclNode<Named>;
def ConstructorUsingShadow : DeclNode<UsingShadow>;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101777
When -gstrict-dwarf is specified, generate DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type
at DWARF 4 or above
Reviewed By: dblaikie, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100630
`__block` variables used to be always stored on the head instead of stack.
D51564 allowed `__block` variables to the stored on the stack like normal
variablesif they not captured by any escaping block, but the debug-info
generation code wasn't made aware of it so we still unconditionally emit DWARF
expressions pointing to the heap.
This patch makes CGDebugInfo use the `EscapingByref` introduced in D51564 that
tracks whether the `__block` variable is actually on the heap. If it's stored on
the stack instead we just use the debug info we would generate for normal
variables instead.
Reviewed By: ahatanak, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99946
Warn when a declaration uses an identifier that doesn't obey the reserved
identifier rule from C and/or C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93095
Summary: The tags DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 and DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11, introduced in Dwarf-5, are unexpected in previous versions. Fixing the mismathing doesn't have any drawbacks for any other debuggers, but helps dbx.
Reviewed By: aprantl, shchenz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250
The first one is the real parameters of the coroutine function, the
other one just for copying parameters to the coroutine frame.
Considering the following c++ code:
```
struct coro {
...
};
coro foo(struct test & t) {
...
co_await suspend_always();
...
co_await suspend_always();
...
co_await suspend_always();
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
auto c = foo(...);
c.handle.resume();
...
}
```
Function foo is the standard coroutine function, and it has only
one parameter named t (ignoring this at first),
when we use the llvm code to compile this function, we can get the
following ir:
```
!2921 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "foo", linkageName:
"_ZN6Object3fooE4test", scope: !2211, file: !45, li\
ne: 48, type: !2329, scopeLine: 48, flags: DIFlagPrototyped |
DIFlagAllCallsDescribed, spFlags: DISPFlagDefi\
nition | DISPFlagOptimized, unit: !44, declaration: !2328,
retainedNodes: !2922)
!2924 = !DILocalVariable(name: "t", arg: 2, scope: !2921, file: !45,
line: 48, type: !838)
...
!2926 = !DILocalVariable(name: "t", scope: !2921, type: !838, flags:
DIFlagArtificial)
```
We can find there are two `the same` DIVariable named t in the same
dwarf scope for foo.resume.
And when we try to use llvm-dwarfdump to dump the dwarf info of this
elf, we get the following output:
```
0x00006684: DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_low_pc (0x00000000004013a0)
DW_AT_high_pc (0x00000000004013a8)
DW_AT_frame_base (DW_OP_reg7 RSP)
DW_AT_object_pointer (0x0000669c)
DW_AT_GNU_all_call_sites (true)
DW_AT_specification (0x00005b5c "_ZN6Object3fooE4test")
0x000066a5: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_name ("t")
DW_AT_decl_file ("/disk1/yifeng.dongyifeng/my_code/llvm/build/bin/coro-debug-1.cpp")
DW_AT_decl_line (48)
DW_AT_type (0x00004146 "test")
0x000066ba: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name ("t")
DW_AT_type (0x00004146 "test")
DW_AT_artificial (true)
```
The elf also has two 't' in the same scope.
But unluckily, it might let the debugger
confused. And failed to print parameters for O0 or above.
This patch will make coroutine parameters and move
parameters use the same DIVar and try to fix the problems
that I mentioned before.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewed By: aprantl, jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97533
This ensures these types have distinct names if they are distinct types
(eg: if one is an instantiation with a type in one inline namespace, and
another from a type with the same simple name, but in a different inline
namespace).
Since the introduction of class properties in Objective-C it is possible to declare a class and an instance
property with the same identifier in an interface/protocol.
Right now Clang just generates debug information for whatever property comes first in the source file.
The second property is ignored as it's filtered out by the set of already emitted properties (which is just
using the identifier of the property to check for equivalence). I don't think generating debug info in this case
was never supported as the identifier filter is in place since 7123bca7fb6e1dde51be8329cfb523d2bb9ffadf
(which precedes the introduction of class properties).
This patch expands the filter to take in account identifier + whether the property is class/instance. This
ensures that both properties are emitted in this special situation.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99512
C functions may be declared and defined in different prototypes like below. This patch unifies the checks for mangling names in symbol linkage name emission and debug linkage name emission so that the two names are consistent.
static int go(int);
static int go(a) int a;
{
return a;
}
Test Plan:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98799
This was motivated by the fact that constructor type homing (debug info
optimization that we want to turn on by default) drops some libc++ types,
so an attribute would allow us to override constructor homing and emit
them anyway. I'm currently looking into the particular libc++ issue, but
even if we do fix that, this issue might come up elsewhere and it might be
nice to have this.
As I've implemented it now, the attribute isn't specific to the
constructor homing optimization and overrides all of the debug info
optimizations.
Open to discussion about naming, specifics on what the attribute should do, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97411
Previously, the definition was so-marked, but the declaration was
not. This resulted in LLVM's dwarf emission treating the function as
being external, and incorrectly emitting DW_AT_external.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96044
Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
class types.
The goal is to provide a way to bypass constructor homing when emitting
class definitions and force class definitions in the debug info.
Not sure about the wording of the attribute, or whether it should be
specific to classes with constructors
with fix to test case and stringrefs.
Currently (for codeview) lambdas have a string like `<lambda_0>` in
their mangled name, and don't have any display name. This change uses the
`<lambda_0>` as the display name, which helps distinguish between lambdas
in -gline-tables-only, since there are no linkage names there.
It also changes how we display lambda names; previously we used
`<unnamed-tag>`; now it will show `<lambda_0>`.
I added a function to the mangling context code to create this string;
for Itanium it just returns an empty string.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48432
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95187
This reverts 9b21d4b9434d2d4796b0d60d64f6ded9bac95441
Currently (for codeview) lambdas have a string like `<lambda_0>` in
their mangled name, and don't have any display name. This change uses the
`<lambda_0>` as the display name, which helps distinguish between lambdas
in -gline-tables-only, since there are no linkage names there.
It also changes how we display lambda names; previously we used
`<unnamed-tag>`; now it will show `<lambda_0>`.
I added a function to the mangling context code to create this string;
for Itanium it just returns an empty string.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48432
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95187
For Clang synthesized `__va_list_tag` (`CreateX86_64ABIBuiltinVaListDecl`),
its DW_AT_decl_file/DW_AT_decl_line are arbitrarily set from `CurLoc`.
In a stage 2 `-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug` clang build, I observe that
in driver.cpp, DW_AT_decl_file/DW_AT_decl_line may be set to an `#include` line
(the transitively included file uses va_arg (`__builtin_va_arg`)).
This seems arbitrary. Drop that.
Reviewed By: #debug-info, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94735
`getLineNumber()` picks CurLoc if the parameter is invalid. This appears to
mainly work around missing SourceLocation information for some constructs, but
sometimes adds unintended locations.
* For `CodeGenObjC/debug-info-blocks.m`, `CurLoc` has been advanced to the closing brace. The debug line of `ImplicitVarParameter` is set to the line of `}` because this implicit parameter has an invalid `SourceLocation`. The debug line is a bit arbitrary - perhaps the location of `^{` is better.
* The file/line of Clang synthesized `__va_list_tag` is arbitrarily attached a `#include` line. D94735
Drop the special case to make getLineNumber less magic and add CurLoc fallback in its callers instead.
Tested with stage 2 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug clang, byte identical.
Reviewed By: #debug-info, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94391
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b826591cdf6bd6b468b8a7d23377b29e, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb9da1a46a0ca4dba2e49e2426036303.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20d0d2b1c5724bb17e969d036fced4cd, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81e72d44bcc58ffe1731bfc7abb73ce0 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c66781b50ff007cb089c5905f9bb9e8af2 by me
> 95c7b6cadbc9a3d4376ef44edbeb3c8bb5b8d7fc by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429473c2b10b109991d7577a3cea41140 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf726d15f210ab4917142beec51848258.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20d0d2b1c5724bb17e969d036fced4cd, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81e72d44bcc58ffe1731bfc7abb73ce0 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c66781b50ff007cb089c5905f9bb9e8af2 by me
95c7b6cadbc9a3d4376ef44edbeb3c8bb5b8d7fc by Sam McCall
430d5d8429473c2b10b109991d7577a3cea41140 by Dave Zarzycki
for function scopes, rather than using the qualified name.
In line-tables-only mode, we used to emit qualified names as the display name for functions when using CodeView.
This patch changes to emitting the parent scopes instead, with forward declarations for class types.
The total object file size ends up being slightly smaller than if we use the full qualified names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94639
