- This fixed a number of bugs in if-converter, tail merging, and post-allocation
scheduler. If-converter now runs branch folding / tail merging first to
maximize if-conversion opportunities.
- Also changed the t2IT instruction slightly. It now defines the ITSTATE
register which is read by instructions in the IT block.
- Added Thumb2 specific hazard recognizer to ensure the scheduler doesn't
change the instruction ordering in the IT block (since IT mask has been
finalized). It also ensures no other instructions can be scheduled between
instructions in the IT block.
This is not yet enabled.
llvm-svn: 106344
instructions, but it doesn't really understand live ranges, so the first
INSERT_SUBREG uses an implicitly defined register.
Fix it in LiveVariableAnalysis by adding the <undef> flag.
llvm-svn: 106333
entries used by llvm-gcc. *_[U]MIN and such can be added later if needed.
This enables the front ends to simplify handling of the atomic intrinsics by
removing the target-specific decision about which targets can handle the
intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 106321
so when IfConverter::CopyAndPredicateBlock checks to see if it should ignore
an instruction because it is a branch, it should not check if the branch is
predicated.
This case (when IgnoreBr is true) is only relevant from IfConvertTriangle,
where new branches are inserted after the block has been copied and predicated.
If the original branch is not removed, we end up with multiple conditional
branches (possibly conflicting) at the end of the block. Aside from any
immediate errors resulting from that, this confuses the AnalyzeBranch functions
so that the branches are not analyzable. That in turn causes the IfConverter to
think that the "Simple" pattern can be applied, and things go downhill fast
because the "Simple" pattern does _not_ apply if the block can fall through.
This is pretty fragile. If there are other degenerate cases where AnalyzeBranch
fails, but where the block may still fall through, the IfConverter should not
perform its "Simple" if-conversion. But, I don't know how to do that with the
current AnalyzeBranch interface, so for now, the best thing seems to be to
avoid creating branches that AnalyzeBranch cannot handle.
Evan, please review!
llvm-svn: 106291
switch from this:
if (TimePassesIsEnabled) {
NamedRegionTimer T(Name, GroupName);
do_something();
} else {
do_something(); // duplicate the code, this time without a timer!
}
to this:
{
NamedRegionTimer T(Name, GroupName, TimePassesIsEnabled);
do_something();
}
llvm-svn: 106285
addresses a longstanding deficiency noted in many FIXMEs scattered
across all the targets.
This effectively moves the problem up one level, replacing eleven
FIXMEs in the targets with eight FIXMEs in CodeGen, plus one path
through FastISel where we actually supply a DebugLoc, fixing Radar
7421831.
llvm-svn: 106243
for the moment. The implementation of the libcall will follow.
Currently, the llvm-gcc knows when the intrinsics can be correctly handled by
the back end and only generates them in those cases, issuing libcalls directly
otherwise. That's too much coupling. The intrinsics should always be
generated and the back end decide how to handle them, be it with a libcall,
inline code, or whatever. This patch is a step in that direction.
rdar://8097623
llvm-svn: 106227
LiveVariableAnalysis was a bit picky about a register only being redefined once,
but that really isn't necessary.
Here is an example of chained INSERT_SUBREGs that we can handle now:
68 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1028<kill>, 14
register: %reg1040 +[70,134:0)
76 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1029<kill>, 13
register: %reg1040 replace range with [70,78:1) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,134:0) 0@78-(134) 1@70-(78)
84 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1030<kill>, 12
register: %reg1040 replace range with [78,86:2) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,86:2)[86,134:0) 0@86-(134) 1@70-(78) 2@78-(86)
92 %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1031<kill>, 11
register: %reg1040 replace range with [86,94:3) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,86:2)[86,94:3)[94,134:0) 0@94-(134) 1@70-(78) 2@78-(86) 3@86-(94)
rdar://problem/8096390
llvm-svn: 106152
will conflict with another live range. The place which creates this scenerio is
the code in X86 that lowers a select instruction by splitting the MBBs. This
eliminates the need to check from the bottom up in an MBB for live pregs.
llvm-svn: 106066
SimpleRegisterCoalescing::JoinIntervals() uses CoalescerPair to determine if a
copy is coalescable, and in very rare cases it can return true where LHS is not
live - the coalescable copy can come from an alias of the physreg in LHS.
llvm-svn: 106021
combined to an insert_subreg, i.e., where the destination register is larger
than the source. We need to check that the subregs can be composed for that
case in a symmetrical way to the case when the destination is smaller.
llvm-svn: 106004
Early clobbers defining a virtual register were first alocated to a physreg and
then processed as a physreg EC, spilling the virtreg.
This fixes PR7382.
llvm-svn: 105998
Given a copy instruction, CoalescerPair can determine which registers to
coalesce in order to eliminate the copy. It deals with all the subreg fun to
determine a tuple (DstReg, SrcReg, SubIdx) such that:
- SrcReg is a virtual register that will disappear after coalescing.
- DstReg is a virtual or physical register whose live range will be extended.
- SubIdx is 0 when DstReg is a physical register.
- SrcReg can be joined with DstReg:SubIdx.
CoalescerPair::isCoalescable() determines if another copy instruction is
compatible with the same tuple. This fixes some NEON miscompilations where
shuffles are getting coalesced as if they were copies.
The CoalescerPair class will replace a lot of the spaghetti logic in JoinCopy
later.
llvm-svn: 105997
replacing the overly conservative checks that I had introduced recently to
deal with correctness issues. This makes a pretty noticable difference
in our testcases where reg_sequences are used. I've updated one test to
check that we no longer emit the unnecessary subreg moves.
llvm-svn: 105991
clean-up to a catch-all after inlining, take into account that there could be
filter IDs as well. The presence of filters don't mean that the selector catches
anything. It's just metadata information.
llvm-svn: 105872
