The truncation was causing the sorting algorithm to behave oddly when comparing
positive and negative offsets. Fortunately, this doesn't currently happen in
practice and was exposed by a WIP. Thus, I can't test this change now, but the
follow on patch will.
llvm-svn: 263255
llvm::getDISubprogram walks the instructions in a function, looking for one in the scope of the current function, so that it can find the !dbg entry for the subprogram itself.
Now that !dbg is attached to functions, this should not be necessary. This patch changes all uses to just query the subprogram directly on the function.
Ideally this should be NFC, but in reality its possible that a function:
has no !dbg (in which case there's likely a bug somewhere in an opt pass), or
that none of the instructions had a scope referencing the function, so we used to not find the !dbg on the function but now we will
Reviewed by Duncan Exon Smith.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18074
llvm-svn: 263184
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Reapplied with a fix for PR26870 (avoid premature use of TargetConstant in ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG expansion).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 263159
This is a fairly straightforward port to the new pass manager with one
exception. It removes a very questionable use of releaseMemory() in
the old pass to invalidate its caches between runs on a function.
I don't think this is really guaranteed to be safe. I've just used the
more direct port to the new PM to address this by nuking the results
object each time the pass runs. While this could cause some minor malloc
traffic increase, I don't expect the compile time performance hit to be
noticable, and it makes the correctness and other aspects of the pass
much easier to reason about. In some cases, it may make things faster by
making the sets and maps smaller with better locality. Indeed, the
measurements collected by Bruno (thanks!!!) show mostly compile time
improvements.
There is sadly very limited testing at this point as there are only two
tests of memdep, and both rely on GVN. I'll be porting GVN next and that
will exercise this heavily though.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17962
llvm-svn: 263082
This patch teaches CGP to duplicate addressing mode computations into cold paths (detected via explicit cold attribute on calls) if required to let addressing mode be safely sunk into the basic block containing each load and store.
In general, duplicating code into cold blocks may result in code growth, but should not effect performance. In this case, it's better to duplicate some code than to put extra pressure on the register allocator by making it keep the address through the entirely of the fast path.
This patch only handles addressing computations, but in principal, we could implement a more general cold cold scheduling heuristic which tries to reduce register pressure in the fast path by duplicating code into the cold path. Getting the profitability of the general case right seemed likely to be challenging, so I stuck to the existing case (addressing computation) we already had.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17652
llvm-svn: 263074
Summary:
The code in SelectionDAG did not handle the case where the
register type and output types were different, but had the same size.
Reviewers: arsenm, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17940
llvm-svn: 263022
This re-applies r262886 with a fix for 32 bit platforms that have 8 byte
pointer alignment, effectively reverting r262892.
Original Message:
Currently some SDNode operands are malloc'd, some are stored inline in
subclasses of SDNode, and some are thrown into a BumpPtrAllocator.
This scheme is complex, inconsistent, and makes refactoring SDNodes
fairly difficult.
Instead, we can allocate all of the operands using an ArrayRecycler
that wraps a BumpPtrAllocator. This keeps the cache locality when
iterating operands, improves locality when iterating SDNodes without
looking at operands, and vastly simplifies the ownership semantics.
It also means we stop overallocating SDNodes by 2-3x and will make it
simpler to fix the rampant undefined behaviour we have in how we
mutate SDNodes from one kind to another (See llvm.org/pr26808).
This is NFC other than the changes in memory behaviour, and I ran some
LNT tests to make sure this didn't hurt compile time. Not many tests
changed: there were a couple of 1-2% regressions reported, but there
were more improvements (of up to 4%) than regressions.
llvm-svn: 262902
Looks like the largest SDNode is different between 32 and 64 bit now,
so this is breaking 32 bit bots. Reverting while I figure out a fix.
This reverts r262886.
llvm-svn: 262892
Currently some SDNode operands are malloc'd, some are stored inline in
subclasses of SDNode, and some are thrown into a BumpPtrAllocator.
This scheme is complex, inconsistent, and makes refactoring SDNodes
fairly difficult.
Instead, we can allocate all of the operands using an ArrayRecycler
that wraps a BumpPtrAllocator. This keeps the cache locality when
iterating operands, improves locality when iterating SDNodes without
looking at operands, and vastly simplifies the ownership semantics.
It also means we stop overallocating SDNodes by 2-3x and will make it
simpler to fix the rampant undefined behaviour we have in how we
mutate SDNodes from one kind to another (See llvm.org/pr26808).
This is NFC other than the changes in memory behaviour, and I ran some
LNT tests to make sure this didn't hurt compile time. Not many tests
changed: there were a couple of 1-2% regressions reported, but there
were more improvements (of up to 4%) than regressions.
llvm-svn: 262886
Before this change, we would get the type definition in the middle
of the instruction.
E.g., %0(48) = G_ADD %struct_alias = type { i32, i16 } %edi, %edi
Now, we have just the expected type name:
%0(48) = G_ADD %struct_alias %edi, %edi
llvm-svn: 262885
Now the type API is always available, but when global-isel is not
built the implementation does nothing.
Note: The implementation free of ifdefs is WIP and tracked here in PR26576.
llvm-svn: 262873
Rematerializing and merging into a bigger register class at the same
time, requires the subregister range lanemasks getting remapped to the
new register class.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR26805
llvm-svn: 262768
copy coalescing with enabled subregister liveness can reveal undef uses,
previously this was only checked for the SrcReg in updateRegDefsUses()
but we need to check DstReg as well.
llvm-svn: 262767
The divrem combine assumed the type of the div/rem is simple, which isn't
necessarily true. This probably worked fine until r250825, since it only
saw legal types, but now breaks when it runs as a pre-type-legalization
combine.
This fixes PR26835.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17878
llvm-svn: 262746
When div+rem calls on the same arguments are found, the ARM back-end merges the
two calls into one __aeabi_divmod call for up to 32-bits values. However,
for 64-bit values, which also have a lib call (__aeabi_ldivmod), it wasn't
merging the calls, and thus calling ldivmod twice and spilling the temporary
results, which generated pretty bad code.
This patch legalises 64-bit lib calls for divmod, so that now all the spilling
and the second call are gone. It also relaxes the DivRem combiner a bit on the
legal type check, since it was already checking for isLegalOrCustom on every
value, so the extra check for isTypeLegal was redundant.
Second attempt, creating TLI.isOperationCustom like isOperationExpand, to make
sure we only emit valid types or the ones that were explicitly marked as custom.
Now, passing check-all and test-suite on x86, ARM and AArch64.
This patch fixes PR17193 (and a long time FIXME in the tests).
llvm-svn: 262738
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 262599
Summary:
Removing MMOs is not our prefer behavior any more.
Reviewers: mcrosier, reames
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17668
llvm-svn: 262580
If we have a loop with a rarely taken path, we will prune that from the blocks which get added as part of the loop chain. The problem is that we weren't then recognizing the loop chain as schedulable when considering the preheader when forming the function chain. We'd then fall to various non-predecessors before finally scheduling the loop chain (as if the CFG was unnatural.) The net result was that there could be lots of garbage between a loop preheader and the loop, even though we could have directly fallen into the loop. It also meant we separated hot code with regions of colder code.
The particular reason for the rejection of the loop chain was that we were scanning predecessor of the header, seeing the backedge, believing that was a globally more important predecessor (true), but forgetting to account for the fact the backedge precessor was already part of the existing loop chain (oops!.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17830
llvm-svn: 262547
Catch objects with a displacement of zero do not initialize a catch
object. The displacement is relative to %rsp at the end of the
function's prologue for x86_64 targets.
If we place an object at the top-of-stack, we will end up wit a
displacement of zero resulting in our catch object remaining
uninitialized.
Address this by creating our catch objects as fixed objects. We will
ensure that the UnwindHelp object is created after the catch objects so
that no catch object will have a displacement of zero.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17823
llvm-svn: 262546
