17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Shiva Chen
2c864551df [DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is

!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)

We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is

llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)

It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.

We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024

Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.

llvm-svn: 331841
2018-05-09 02:40:45 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic
e2bfcd6394 Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.

The second part is platform independent and ensures that:

* CFI instructions do not affect code generation (they are not counted as
  instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging)
* Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
  different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
  about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
  directives where necessary.

Added CFIInstrInserter pass:

* analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register are valid
  at its entry and exit
* verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
  incoming values of their successors
* inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
  rule for calculating CFA

Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.

Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848

llvm-svn: 330706
2018-04-24 10:32:08 +00:00
Reid Kleckner
7adb2fdbba Revert "Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
This reverts r317579, originally committed as r317100.

There is a design issue with marking CFI instructions duplicatable. Not
all targets support the CFIInstrInserter pass, and targets like Darwin
can't cope with duplicated prologue setup CFI instructions. The compact
unwind info emission fails.

When the following code is compiled for arm64 on Mac at -O3, the CFI
instructions end up getting tail duplicated, which causes compact unwind
info emission to fail:
  int a, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m;
  void n(int o, int *b) {
    if (g)
      f = 0;
    for (; f < o; f++) {
      m = a;
      if (l > j * k > i)
        j = i = k = d;
      h = b[c] - e;
    }
  }

We get assembly that looks like this:
; BB#1:                                 ; %if.then
Lloh3:
	adrp	x9, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh4:
	ldr	x9, [x9, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
	mov	 w8, wzr
Lloh5:
	str		wzr, [x9]
	stp	x20, x19, [sp, #-16]!   ; 8-byte Folded Spill
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
	.cfi_offset w19, -8
	.cfi_offset w20, -16
	cmp		w8, w0
	b.lt	LBB0_3
	b	LBB0_7
LBB0_2:                                 ; %entry.if.end_crit_edge
Lloh6:
	adrp	x8, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh7:
	ldr	x8, [x8, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
Lloh8:
	ldr		w8, [x8]
	stp	x20, x19, [sp, #-16]!   ; 8-byte Folded Spill
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
	.cfi_offset w19, -8
	.cfi_offset w20, -16
	cmp		w8, w0
	b.ge	LBB0_7
LBB0_3:                                 ; %for.body.lr.ph

Note the multiple .cfi_def* directives. Compact unwind info emission
can't handle that.

llvm-svn: 317726
2017-11-08 21:31:14 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic
e2a585dddc Reland "Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
Reland r317100 with minor fix regarding ComputeCommonTailLength function in
BranchFolding.cpp. Skipping top CFI instructions block needs to executed on
several more return points in ComputeCommonTailLength().

Original r317100 message:

"Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"

This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.

It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.

The second part is platform independent and ensures that:

- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
  different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
  about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
  directives where necessary.

Changed CFI instructions so that they:

- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal

Added CFIInstrInserter pass:

- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
  its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
  incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
  rule for calculating CFA

Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.

CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.

Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.

llvm-svn: 317579
2017-11-07 14:40:27 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic
bb5c84fb57 Revert "Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
This reverts r317100 as it introduced sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf
buildbot failure (build #15606).

llvm-svn: 317136
2017-11-01 23:05:52 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic
f2faee92aa Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.

It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.

The second part is platform independent and ensures that:

- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
  different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
  about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
  directives where necessary.

Changed CFI instructions so that they:

- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal

Added CFIInstrInserter pass:

- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
  its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
  incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
  rule for calculating CFA

Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.

CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.


Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35844

llvm-svn: 317100
2017-11-01 16:04:11 +00:00
Daniel Jasper
559aa75382 Revert "r306529 - [X86] Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue"
I am 99% sure that this breaks the PPC ASAN build bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-ppc64be-linux/builds/3112/steps/64-bit%20check-asan/logs/stdio

If it doesn't go back to green, we can recommit (and fix the original
commit message at the same time :) ).

llvm-svn: 306676
2017-06-29 13:58:24 +00:00
Petar Jovanovic
7b3a38ec30 [X86] Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue
CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.

Majority of the changes in this patch:

1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.

These changes are target independent and described below.

Changed CFI instructions so that they:

1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal

Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.

Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.

Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046

llvm-svn: 306529
2017-06-28 10:21:17 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
75819aedf6 [PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram.
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.

Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.

Motivation
----------

Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.

We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.

Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>

llvm-svn: 266446
2016-04-15 15:57:41 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
ab16be799c Re-commit r265039 "[X86] Merge adjacent stack adjustments in eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr (PR27140)"
Third time's the charm? The previous attempt (r265345) caused ASan test
failures on X86, as broken CFI caused stack traces to not work.

This version of the patch makes sure not to merge with stack adjustments
that have CFI, and to not add merged instructions' offests to the CFI
about to be generated.

This is already covered by the lit tests; I just got the expectations
wrong previously.

llvm-svn: 265623
2016-04-07 00:05:49 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
a7e396b5ef Revert "Re-commit r265039 "[X86] Merge adjacent stack adjustments in eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr (PR27140)""
It seems to be causing ASan tests to crash, probably due to
miscompiling the run-time somehow.

llvm-svn: 265551
2016-04-06 16:10:20 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
a47a692341 Re-commit r265039 "[X86] Merge adjacent stack adjustments in eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr (PR27140)"
The original commit miscompiled things on 32-bit Windows, e.g. a Clang
boostrap. It turns out that mergeSPUpdates() was a bit too generous in
what it interpreted as a stack adjustment, causing the following code:

        addl    $12, %esp
        leal    -4(%ebp), %esp

To be "optimized" into simply:

        addl    $8, %esp

This commit tightens up mergeSPUpdates() and includes a new test
(test14 in movtopush.ll) for this situation.

llvm-svn: 265345
2016-04-04 21:02:46 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
b8089516a5 testcase gardening: update the emissionKind enum to the new syntax. (NFC)
llvm-svn: 265081
2016-04-01 00:16:49 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
132cd62121 Revert r265039 "[X86] Merge adjacent stack adjustments in eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr (PR27140)"
I think it might have caused these build breakages:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-win2008-selfhost/builds/7234/steps/build%20stage%202/logs/stdio
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-windows/builds/19566/steps/run%20tests/logs/stdio

llvm-svn: 265046
2016-03-31 20:27:30 +00:00
Hans Wennborg
e97fb414e8 [X86] Merge adjacent stack adjustments in eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr (PR27140)
For code such as:

  void f(int, int);
  void g() {
      f(1, 2);
  }

compiled for 32-bit X86 Linux, Clang would previously generate:

  subl    $12, %esp
  subl    $8, %esp
  pushl   $2
  pushl   $1
  calll   f
  addl    $16, %esp
  addl    $12, %esp
  retl

This patch fixes that by merging adjacent stack adjustments in
eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr().

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18627

llvm-svn: 265039
2016-03-31 19:26:24 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne
d4bff30370 DI: Reverse direction of subprogram -> function edge.
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.

For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.

This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.

Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.

Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265

llvm-svn: 252219
2015-11-05 22:03:56 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein
73dc85293f [X86] Generate .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset correctly when pushing arguments
When push instructions are being used to pass function arguments on
the stack, and either EH or debugging are enabled, we need to generate
.cfi_adjust_cfa_offset directives appropriately. For (synch) EH, it is
enough for the CFA offset to be correct at every call site, while
for debugging we want to be correct after every push.

Darwin does not support this well, so don't use pushes whenever it
would be required.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13767

llvm-svn: 251904
2015-11-03 08:17:25 +00:00