IndVarSimplify sometimes makes transforms basing on users that are trivially dead. In particular,
if DCE wasn't run before it, there may be a dead `sext/zext` in loop that will trigger widening
transforms, however it makes no sense to do it.
This patch teaches IndVarsSimplify ignore the mist trivial cases of that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47974
Reviewed By: sanjoy
llvm-svn: 334567
Name table occupies a big chunk of size in current binary format sample profile.
In order to reduce its size, the patch changes the sample writer/reader to
save/restore MD5Hash of names in the name table. Sample annotation phase will
also use MD5Hash of name to query samples accordingly.
Experiment shows compact binary format can reduce the size of sample profile by
2/3 compared with binary format generally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47955
llvm-svn: 334447
Summary:
Previously we would add them for adds, but not multiplies.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48038
llvm-svn: 334428
Summary:
`%ret = add nuw i8 %x, C`
From [[ https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#add-instruction | langref ]]:
nuw and nsw stand for “No Unsigned Wrap” and “No Signed Wrap”,
respectively. If the nuw and/or nsw keywords are present,
the result value of the add is a poison value if unsigned
and/or signed overflow, respectively, occurs.
So if `C` is `-1`, `%x` can only be `0`, and the result is always `-1`.
I'm not sure we want to use `KnownBits`/`LVI` here, because there is
exactly one possible value (all bits set, `-1`), so some other pass
should take care of replacing the known-all-ones with constant `-1`.
The `test/Transforms/InstCombine/set-lowbits-mask-canonicalize.ll` change *is* confusing.
What happening is, before this: (omitting `nuw` for simplicity)
1. First, InstCombine D47428/rL334127 folds `shl i32 1, %NBits`) to `shl nuw i32 -1, %NBits`
2. Then, InstSimplify D47883/rL334222 folds `shl nuw i32 -1, %NBits` to `-1`,
3. `-1` is inverted to `0`.
But now:
1. *This* InstSimplify fold `%ret = add nuw i32 %setbit, -1` -> `-1` happens first,
before InstCombine D47428/rL334127 fold could happen.
Thus we now end up with the opposite constant,
and it is all good: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/OA9https://rise4fun.com/Alive/sldC
Was mentioned in D47428 review.
Follow-up for D47883.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47908
llvm-svn: 334298
There could be more than one PHIs in exit block using same loop recurrence.
Don't assume there is only one and fix each user.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47788
llvm-svn: 334271
%ret = add nuw i8 %x, C
From langref:
nuw and nsw stand for “No Unsigned Wrap” and “No Signed Wrap”,
respectively. If the nuw and/or nsw keywords are present,
the result value of the add is a poison value if unsigned
and/or signed overflow, respectively, occurs.
So if C is -1, %x can only be 0, and the result is always -1.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/sldC
Was mentioned in D47428 review.
llvm-svn: 334236
Summary:
`%r = shl nuw i8 C, %x`
As per langref:
```
If the nuw keyword is present, then the shift produces
a poison value if it shifts out any non-zero bits.
```
Thus, if the sign bit is set on `C`, then `%x` can only be `0`,
which means that `%r` can only be `C`.
Or in other words, set sign bit means that the signed value
is negative, so the constant is `<= 0`.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/WMkhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/udv
Was mentioned in D47428 review.
We already handle the `0` constant, https://godbolt.org/g/UZq1sJ, so this only handles negative constants.
Could use computeKnownBits() / LazyValueInfo,
but the cost-benefit analysis (https://reviews.llvm.org/D47891)
suggests it isn't worth it.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47883
llvm-svn: 334222
These weren't included in D19544 - probably just an oversight.
D40044 made it more likely that we'll have LLVM math intrinsics rather
than libcalls, so this bug was more easily exposed.
As the tests/code show, we already have the complete mappings for pow/exp/log.
I don't have any experience with SVML, so I don't know if anything else is
missing. It's also not clear to me that we should be doing this transform in
IR rather than DAG/isel, but that's a separate issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47610
llvm-svn: 334211
%r = shl nuw i8 C, %x
As per langref: If the nuw keyword is present, then the shift produces
a poison value if it shifts out any non-zero bits.
Thus, if the sign bit is set on C, then %x can only be 0,
which means that %r can only be C.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/WMk
Was mentioned in D47428 review.
llvm-svn: 334200
We do the same thing in rewriteSingleStoreAlloca.
Fixes PR37632.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47825
llvm-svn: 334187
The bug report:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36036
...requests a DAG change for this, but an IR canonicalization
probably handles most cases. If we still want to match this
pattern in the backend, there's a proposal for that too:
D47831
Alive proofs including nsw/nuw cases that were first noted in:
D46988
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Kmp
This patch is largely copied from the existing code that was
initially added with:
D40984
...but I didn't see much gain from trying to share code.
llvm-svn: 334137
Summary:
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37603 | PR37603 ]].
https://godbolt.org/g/VCMNpShttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/idM
When doing bit manipulations, it is quite common to calculate some bit mask,
and apply it to some value via `and`.
The typical C code looks like:
```
int mask_signed_add(int nbits) {
return (1 << nbits) - 1;
}
```
which is translated into (with `-O3`)
```
define dso_local i32 @mask_signed_add(int)(i32) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
%2 = shl i32 1, %0
%3 = add nsw i32 %2, -1
ret i32 %3
}
```
But there is a second, less readable variant:
```
int mask_signed_xor(int nbits) {
return ~(-(1 << nbits));
}
```
which is translated into (with `-O3`)
```
define dso_local i32 @mask_signed_xor(int)(i32) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
%2 = shl i32 -1, %0
%3 = xor i32 %2, -1
ret i32 %3
}
```
Since we created such a mask, it is quite likely that we will use it in `and` next.
And then we may get rid of `not` op by folding into `andn`.
But now that i have actually looked:
https://godbolt.org/g/VTUDmU
_some_ backend changes will be needed too.
We clearly loose `bzhi` recognition.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47428
llvm-svn: 334127
Before this patch, debugify would insert debug value intrinsics before the
terminating instruction in a block. This had the advantage of being simple,
but was a bit too simple/unrealistic.
This patch teaches debugify to insert debug values immediately after their
operand defs. This enables better testing of the compiler.
For example, with this patch, `opt -debugify-each` is able to identify a
vectorizer DI-invariance bug fixed in llvm.org/PR32761. In this bug, the
vectorizer produced different output with/without debug info present.
Reverting Davide's bugfix locally, I see:
$ ~/scripts/opt-check-dbg-invar.sh ./bin/opt \
.../SLPVectorizer/AArch64/spillcost-di.ll -slp-vectorizer
Comparing: -slp-vectorizer .../SLPVectorizer/AArch64/spillcost-di.ll
Baseline: /var/folders/j8/t4w0bp8j6x1g6fpghkcb4sjm0000gp/T/tmp.iYYeL1kf
With DI : /var/folders/j8/t4w0bp8j6x1g6fpghkcb4sjm0000gp/T/tmp.sQtQSeet
9,11c9,11
< %5 = getelementptr inbounds %0, %0* %2, i64 %0, i32 1
< %6 = bitcast i64* %4 to <2 x i64>*
< %7 = load <2 x i64>, <2 x i64>* %6, align 8, !tbaa !0
---
> %5 = load i64, i64* %4, align 8, !tbaa !0
> %6 = getelementptr inbounds %0, %0* %2, i64 %0, i32 1
> %7 = load i64, i64* %6, align 8, !tbaa !5
12a13
> store i64 %5, i64* %8, align 8, !tbaa !0
14,15c15
< %10 = bitcast i64* %8 to <2 x i64>*
< store <2 x i64> %7, <2 x i64>* %10, align 8, !tbaa !0
---
> store i64 %7, i64* %9, align 8, !tbaa !5
:: Found a test case ^
Running this over the *.ll files in tree, I found four additional examples
which compile differently with/without DI present. I plan on filing bugs for
these.
llvm-svn: 334118
These were added for D5603 / rL219542, and there's a proposal to
change one side in D47807.
These are tests of constant propagation, so they shouldn't have
ever been tested/housed under InstCombine.
llvm-svn: 334107
If no alignment is set, the abi/preferred alignment of structs will be
used which may be higher than required. This can lead to extra padding
and in the end an increase in data size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47633
llvm-svn: 334099
We should never get different CodeGen based on whether the code is being
compiled in debug mode so we must skip over @llvm.dbg.value (and similar)
calls.
Should fix at least the worst part of PR37690.
llvm-svn: 334090
CodeGenPrepare pass move extension instructions close to load instructions in different BB, so they can be combined later. But the extension instructions can't move through logical and shift instructions in current implementation. This patch enables this enhancement, so we can eliminate more extension instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45537
This is re-commit of r331783, which was reverted by r333305. The performance regression was caused by some unlucky alignment, not a code generation problem.
llvm-svn: 334049
When adjusting a cmp in order to canonicalize an abs/nabs select pattern we need
to use the type of the existing operand when creating a new operand not the
type of a select operand, as the two may be different.
This fixes PR37686.
llvm-svn: 334019
As noted in rL333782, we can be both better for optimization and
safer with this transform:
BinOp (shuffle V1, Mask), C --> shuffle (BinOp V1, NewC), Mask
The only potentially unsafe-to-speculate binops are integer div/rem.
All other binops are always safe (although I don't see a way to
assert that in code here).
For opcodes like shifts that can produce poison, it can't matter
here because we know the lanes with undef are dropped by the
subsequent shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47686
llvm-svn: 333962
entries to reach the target. Since these calls don't require type checks,
we can short-circuit them to their real targets, except in cases when they
can be pre-empted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46326
llvm-svn: 333937
When checking a select to see if it matches an abs, allow the true/false values
to be a sign-extension of the comparison value instead of requiring that they're
directly the comparison value, as all the comparison cares about is the sign of
the value.
This fixes a regression due to r333702, where we were no longer generating ctlz
due to isKnownNonNegative failing to match such a pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47631
llvm-svn: 333927
After r333856, opt -debugify would just stop emitting debug value
intrinsics after encountering a musttail call. This wasn't sufficient to
avoid verifier failures.
Debug value intrinicss for all instructions preceding a musttail call
must also be emitted before the musttail call.
llvm-svn: 333866
When we optimize select basing on fact that div by 0 is undef
we should not traverse the instruction which are not guaranteed to
transfer execution to next instruction. Guard intrinsic is an example.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47576
llvm-svn: 333864
There's a patchwork of existing transforms trying to handle
these cases, but as seen in the changed test, we weren't
catching them all.
llvm-svn: 333845
As noted in the review thread for rL333782, we could have
made a bug harder to hit if we were simplifying instructions
before trying other folds.
The shuffle transform in question isn't ever a simplification;
it's just a canonicalization. So I've renamed that to make that
clearer.
This is NFCI at this point, but I've regenerated the test file
to show the cosmetic value naming difference of using
instcombine's RAUW vs. the builder.
Possible follow-ups:
1. Move reassociation folds after simplifies too.
2. Refactor common code; we shouldn't have so much repetition.
llvm-svn: 333820
As noted in the review thread for rL333782, we're lacking coverage
for this transform, so add tests for each binop opcode with constant
operand.
llvm-svn: 333818
Summary:
I noticed this issue because we didn't put the primary cloned loop into
the `NonChildClonedLoops` vector and so never iterated on it. Once
I fixed that, it made it clear why I had to do a really complicated and
unnecesasry dance when updating the loops to remain in canonical form --
I was unwittingly working around the fact that the primary cloned loop
wasn't in the expected list of cloned loops. Doh!
Now that we include it in this vector, we don't need to return it and we
can consolidate the update logic as we correctly have a single place
where it can be handled.
I've just added a test for the iteration order aspect as every time
I changed the update logic partially or incorrectly here, an existing
test failed and caught it so that seems well covered (which is also
evidenced by the extensive working around of this missing update).
Reviewers: asbirlea, sanjoy
Subscribers: mcrosier, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47647
llvm-svn: 333811
Summary:
Getelementptr returns a vector of pointers, instead of a single address,
when one or more of its arguments is a vector. In such case it is not
possible to simplify the expression by inserting a bitcast of operand(0)
into the destination type, as it will create a bitcast between different
sizes.
Reviewers: majnemer, mkuper, mssimpso, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46379
llvm-svn: 333783
This bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37648
...was created with the enhancement to this transform with rL332479.
The urem test shows the disaster potential: any undef divisor lane makes
the whole op undef.
The test diffs show that vector demanded elements turns some of the potential,
but not all, unused binop operands back into undef already.
llvm-svn: 333782
Summary:
Emit summaries for bitcode modules that are only destined for the
regular LTO portion of the build so they can participate in
summary-based dead stripping.
This change reduces the size of a nacl_helper build with cfi-icall
enabled by 7%, removing the majority of the overhead due to enabling
cfi-icall. The cfi-icall size increase was caused by compiling in lots
of unused code and cfi-icall generating jumptable references to unused
symbols that could no longer be removed by -Wl,-gc-sections. Increasing
the visibility of summary-based dead stripping prevented jumptable
entries being created for unused symbols from the regular LTO portion
of the build.
Reviewers: pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: dschuff, mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47594
llvm-svn: 333768
