Summary:
This is just an idea, really two ideas. I expect some push-back,
but I realize that posting a diff is the most comprehensive way to express
these concepts.
This patch introduces a Stage class which represents the
various stages of an instruction pipeline. As a start, I have created a simple
FetchStage that is based on existing logic for how MCA produces
instructions, but now encapsulated in a Stage. The idea should become more concrete
once we introduce additional stages. The idea being, that when a stage completes,
the next stage in the pipeline will be executed. Stages are chained together
as a singly linked list to closely model a real pipeline. For now there is only one stage,
so the stage-to-stage flow of instructions isn't immediately obvious.
Eventually, Stage will also handle event notifications, but that functionality
is not complete, and not destined for this patch. Ideally, an interested party
can register for notifications from a particular stage. Callbacks will be issued to
these listeners at various points in the execution of the stage.
For now, eventing functionality remains similar to what it has been in mca::Backend.
We will be building-up the Stage class as we move on, such as adding debug output.
This patch also removes the unique_ptr<Instruction> return value from
InstrBuilder::createInstruction. An Instruction pointer is still produced,
but now it's up to the caller to decide how that item should be managed post-allocation
(e.g., smart pointer). This allows the Fetch stage to create instructions and
manage the lifetime of those instructions as it wishes, and not have to be bound to any
specific managed pointer type. Other callers of createInstruction might have different
requirements, and thus can manage the pointer to fit their needs. Another idea would be to push the
ownership to the RCU.
Currently, the FetchStage will wrap the Instruction
pointer in a shared_ptr. This allows us to remove the Instruction container in
Backend, which was probably going to disappear, or move, at some point anyways.
Note that I did run these changes through valgrind, to make sure we are not leaking
memory. While the shared_ptr comes with some additional overhead it relieves us
from having to manage a list of generated instructions, and/or make lookup calls
to remove the instructions.
I realize that both the Stage class and the Instruction pointer management
(mentioned directly above) are separate but related ideas, and probably should
land as separate patches; I am happy to do that if either idea is decent.
The main reason these two ideas are together is that
Stage::execute() can mutate an InstRef. For the fetch stage, the InstRef is populated
as the primary action of that stage (execute()). I didn't want to change the Stage interface
to support the idea of generating an instruction. Ideally, instructions are to
be pushed through the pipeline. I didn't want to draw too much of a
specialization just for the fetch stage. Excuse the word-salad.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46741
llvm-svn: 332390
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Summary:
This patch eliminates many places where we originally needed to pass index
values to represent an instruction. The index is still used as a key, in various parts of
MCA. I'm not comfortable eliminating the index just yet. By burying the index in
the instruction, we can avoid exposing that value in many places.
Eventually, we should consider removing the Instructions list in the Backend
all together, it's only used to hold and reclaim the memory for the allocated
Instruction instances. Instead we could pass around a smart pointer. But that's
a separate discussion/patch.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46367
llvm-svn: 331660
This patch introduces two new callbacks in the event listener interface to
handle the "buffered resource reserved" event and the "buffered resource
released" event. Every time a buffered resource is used, an event is generated.
Before this patch, the Scheduler (with the help of the ResourceManager) was
responsible for tracking the scheduler's queue usage. However, that design
forced the Scheduler to 'publish' scheduler's queue pressure information through
the Backend interface.
The goal of this patch is to break the dependency between the BackendStatistics
view, and the Backend. Now the Scheduler knows how to notify "buffer
reserved/released" events. The scheduler's queue usage analysis has been moved
to the BackendStatistics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44686
llvm-svn: 328011
Function computeProcResourceMasks is used by the ResourceManager (owned by the
Scheduler) to compute resource masks for processor resources. Before this
refactoring, there was an implicit dependency between the Scheduler and the
InstrBuilder. That is because InstrBuilder has to know about resource masks when
computing the set of processor resources consumed by a new instruction.
With this patch, the functionality that computes resource masks has been
extracted from the ResourceManager, and moved to a separate file (Support.h).
This helps removing the dependency between the Scheduler and the InstrBuilder.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 327973
This patch introduces a new class named HWStallEvent (see HWEventListener.h),
and updates the event listener interface. A HWStallEvent represents a pipeline
stall caused by the lack of hardware resources. Similarly to HWInstructionEvent,
the event type is an unsigned, and the exact meaning depends on the subtarget.
At the moment, HWStallEvent supports a few generic dispatch events.
The main goals of this patch is to remove the logic that counts dispatch stalls
from the DispatchUnit to the BackendStatistics view.
Previously, DispatchUnit was responsible for counting and classifying dispatch
stall events. With this patch, we delegate the task of counting and classifying
stall events to the listeners (i.e. in our case, it is view
"BackendStatistics"). So, the DispatchUnit doesn't have to do extra
(unnecessary) bookkeeping.
This patch also helps futher simplifying the Backend interface. Now class
BackendStatistics no longer has to query the Backend interface to obtain the
number of dispatch stalls. As a consequence, we can get rid of all the
'getNumXXX()' methods from class Backend.
The long term goal is to remove all the remaining dependencies between the
Backend and the BackendStatistics interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44621
llvm-svn: 327837
Now both method DispatchUnit::checkRAT() and DispatchUnit::canDispatch take as
input an Instruction refrence instead of an instruction descriptor.
This was requested by Simon in D44488 to simplify the diff.
llvm-svn: 327640
Before this patch, the register file was always updated at instruction creation
time. That means, new read-after-write dependencies, and new temporary registers
were allocated at instruction creation time.
This patch refactors the code in InstrBuilder, and move all the logic that
updates the register file into the dispatch unit. We only want to update the
register file when instructions are effectively dispatched (not before).
This refactoring also helps removing a bad dependency between the InstrBuilder
and the DispatchUnit.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 327514
Summary: This is a first step towards making the pipeline configurable.
Subscribers: llvm-commits, andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44309
llvm-svn: 327389
This patch fixes a problem found when testing zero latency instructions on
target AArch64 -mcpu=exynos-m3 / -mcpu=exynos-m1.
On Exynos-m3/m1, direct branches are zero-latency instructions that don't consume
any processor resources. The DispatchUnit marks zero-latency instructions as
"executed", so that no scheduling is required. The event of instruction
executed is then notified to all the listeners, and the reorder buffer (managed
by the RetireControlUnit) is updated. In particular, the entry associated to the
zero-latency instruction in the reorder buffer is marked as executed.
Before this patch, the DispatchUnit forgot to assign a retire control unit token
(RCUToken) to the zero-latency instruction. As a consequence, the RCUToken was
used uninitialized. This was causing a crash in the RetireControlUnit logic.
Fixes PR36650.
llvm-svn: 327056
This allows the customization of the performance report.
Users can specify their own custom sequence of views.
Each view contributes a portion of the performance report generated by the
BackendPrinter.
Internally, class BackendPrinter keeps a sequence of views; views are printed
out in sequence when method 'printReport()' is called.
This patch addresses one of the two review comments from Clement in D43951.
llvm-svn: 327018
llvm-mca is an LLVM based performance analysis tool that can be used to
statically measure the performance of code, and to help triage potential
problems with target scheduling models.
llvm-mca uses information which is already available in LLVM (e.g. scheduling
models) to statically measure the performance of machine code in a specific cpu.
Performance is measured in terms of throughput as well as processor resource
consumption. The tool currently works for processors with an out-of-order
backend, for which there is a scheduling model available in LLVM.
The main goal of this tool is not just to predict the performance of the code
when run on the target, but also help with diagnosing potential performance
issues.
Given an assembly code sequence, llvm-mca estimates the IPC (instructions per
cycle), as well as hardware resources pressure. The analysis and reporting style
were mostly inspired by the IACA tool from Intel.
This patch is related to the RFC on llvm-dev visible at this link:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/121490.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43951
llvm-svn: 326998
