Since `raw_string_ostream` doesn't own the string buffer, it is
desirable (in terms of memory safety) for users to directly reference
the string buffer rather than use `raw_string_ostream::str()`.
Work towards TODO item to remove `raw_string_ostream::str()`.
p.s. also remove some unneeded/dead code.
The issue with the previous implementation bc31be7 was that
getApproximateType could potentially return a null QualType for a
dereferencing operator, which is not what its caller wants.
This patch continues previous efforts to split `Sema` up, this time
covering code completion.
Context can be found in #84184.
Dropping `Code` prefix from function names in `SemaCodeCompletion` would
make sense, but I think this PR has enough changes already.
As usual, formatting changes are done as a separate commit. Hopefully
this helps with the review.
I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.
- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::equals by a factor of
24 under clang/ in terms of their usage.
- The elimination of StringRef::equals brings StringRef closer to
std::string_view, which has operator== but not equals.
- S == "foo" is more readable than S.equals("foo"), especially for
!Long.Expression.equals("str") vs Long.Expression != "str".
The null pointer dereference issue seems happening with in the
expression NNS->getAsType().
Although dyn_cast_or_null<TemplateTypeParmType>() correctly handles null
pointers, it doesn’t prevent the subsequent dereferencing operation.
The fix ensures that NNS pointer is not null before calling the
getAsType() method, thus preventing potential runtime errors caused by
attempting to access a null pointer.
This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
This patch renames {starts,ends}with to {starts,ends}_with for
consistency with std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in
C++20. Since there are only a handful of occurrences, this patch
skips the deprecation phase and simply renames them.
The LinkageSpec case was omitted, and there is a declared CXCursor_Kind
for it. Adapt the testsuite drivers to print mangled names for
declarations with extern linkage. Also update the test baseline for the
recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp test.
Co-authored-by: Matthieu Eyraud <eyraud@adacore.com>
From two aspects:
- For function templates, emit additional template argument
placeholders in the context where it can't be a call in order
to specify an instantiation explicitly.
- Consider expressions with base type specifier such as
'Derived().Base::foo^' a function call.
Reviewed By: nridge
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156605
Original commit message:
"
This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon
three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a
CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method.
The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs.
Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it
is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code
completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the
main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from
previous input in the same REPL session.
The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin
wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as
a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates
completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the
REPL.
In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels
were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like
expression statements at the REPL. For example,
clang-repl> int foo = 42;
clang-repl> f<tab>
From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code
completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to
Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not
include foo.
Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and
CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement
and CCC_Statement respectively.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382
"
The new patch also fixes clangd and several memory issues that the bots reported
and upload the missing files.
Original commit message:
"
This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon
three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a
CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method.
The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs.
Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it
is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code
completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the
main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from
previous input in the same REPL session.
The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin
wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as
a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates
completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the
REPL.
In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels
were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like
expression statements at the REPL. For example,
clang-repl> int foo = 42;
clang-repl> f<tab>
From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code
completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to
Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not
include foo.
Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and
CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement
and CCC_Statement respectively.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382
"
The new patch also fixes clangd and several memory issues that the bots reported.
This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon
three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a
CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method.
The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs.
Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it
is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code
completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the
main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from
previous input in the same REPL session.
The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin
wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as
a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates
completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the
REPL.
In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels
were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like
expression statements at the REPL. For example,
clang-repl> int foo = 42;
clang-repl> f<tab>
From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code
completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to
Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not
include foo.
Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and
CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement
and CCC_Statement respectively.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382
This does the rename for most internal uses of C2x, but does not rename
or reword diagnostics (those will be done in a follow-up).
I also updated standards references and citations to the final wording
in the standard.
- Use this new context in Sema to limit completions to seen ObjC class
names
- Use this new context in clangd to disable include insertions when
completing ObjC forward decls
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150978
This patch replaces some calls to the deprecated `DirectoryEntry::getName()` with calls to `DirectoryEntryRef::getName()` in SemaCodeComplete.cpp.
Depends on D127654.
Reviewed By: bnbarham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127658
This patch migrates uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with_insensitive
to StringRef::{starts,ends}_with_insensitive so that we can use names
similar to those used in std::string_view.
Note that the llvm/ directory has migrated in commit
6c3ea866e93003e16fc55d3b5cedd3bc371d1fde.
I'll post a separate patch to deprecate
StringRef::{starts,ends}with_insensitive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150506
In file `clang/lib/Basic/Module.cpp` the `Module` class had `submodule_begin()` and `submodule_end()` functions to retrieve corresponding iterators for private vector of Modules. This commit removes mentioned functions, and replaces all of theirs usages with `submodules()` function and range-based for-loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148954
The "getField" method is a bit confusing considering we also have a
"getFieldName" method. Instead, use "getFieldDecl" rather than
"getField".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147743
Reported by Coverity:
Big parameter passed by value
Copying large values is inefficient, consider passing by reference; Low, medium, and high size thresholds for detection can be adjusted.
1. Inside "SemaConcept.cpp" file, in subsumes<clang::Sema::MaybeEmitAmbiguousAtomicConstraintsDiagnostic(clang::NamedDecl *, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Expr const *>, clang::NamedDecl *, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Expr const *>)::[lambda(clang::AtomicConstraint const &, clang::AtomicConstraint const &) (instance 2)]>(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::SmallVector<clang::AtomicConstraint *, 2u>, 4u>, llvm::SmallVector<llvm::SmallVector<clang::AtomicConstraint *, 2u>, 4u>, T1): A large function call parameter exceeding the low threshold is passed by value.
i. pass_by_value: Passing parameter PDNF of type NormalForm (size 144 bytes) by value, which exceeds the low threshold of 128 bytes.
ii. pass_by_value: Passing parameter QCNF of type NormalForm (size 144 bytes) by value, which exceeds the low threshold of 128 bytes.
2. Inside "CodeGenAction.cpp" file, in clang::reportOptRecordError(llvm::Error, clang::DiagnosticsEngine &, clang::CodeGenOptions): A very large function call parameter exceeding the high threshold is passed by value.
i. pass_by_value: Passing parameter CodeGenOpts of type clang::CodeGenOptions const (size 1560 bytes) by value, which exceeds the high threshold of 512 bytes.
3. Inside "SemaCodeComplete.cpp" file, in HandleCodeCompleteResults(clang::Sema *, clang::CodeCompleteConsumer *, clang::CodeCompletionContext, clang::CodeCompletionResult *, unsigned int): A large function call parameter exceeding the low threshold is passed by value.
i. pass_by_value: Passing parameter Context of type clang::CodeCompletionContext (size 200 bytes) by value, which exceeds the low threshold of 128 bytes.
4. Inside "SemaConcept.cpp" file, in <unnamed>::SatisfactionStackRAII::SatisfactionStackRAII(clang::Sema &, clang::NamedDecl const *, llvm::FoldingSetNodeID): A large function call parameter exceeding the low threshold is passed by value.
i. pass_by_value: Passing parameter FSNID of type llvm::FoldingSetNodeID (size 144 bytes) by value, which exceeds the low threshold of 128 bytes.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147708
This makes the two interfaces for designators more similar so that it's
easier to merge them together in a future refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147580
The interfaces for designators (i.e. C99 designated initializers) was
done in two slightly different ways. This was rather wasteful as the
differences could be combined into one.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140584
When the initializer of an `auto` variable is dependent, clang doesn't give the
DeclRefExpr a useful dependent type that we can apply heuristics to.
However we can dig one up by looking at the initializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140044
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This revision fixes typos where there are 2 consecutive words which are
duplicated. There should be no code changes in this revision (only
changes to comments and docs). Do let me know if there are any
undesirable changes in this revision. Thanks.
Removes a bunch of obsolete methods in favor of a single one returning
an ArrayRef of TemplateArgument.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136602
This introduces support for nullptr and nullptr_t in C2x mode. The
proposal accepted by WG14 is:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3042.htm
Note, there are quite a few incompatibilities with the C++ feature in
some of the edge cases of this feature. Therefore, there are some FIXME
comments in tests for testing behavior that might change after WG14 has
resolved national body comments (a process we've not yet started). So
this implementation might change slightly depending on the resolution
of comments. This is called out explicitly in the release notes as
well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135099
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove llvm::empty.
Note that no use of llvm::empty requires the ability of llvm::empty to
determine the emptiness from begin/end only.
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z |
parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case |
grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130827
