There are at least 3 problems:
1. We're distributing across large patterns, but fail to do that for the minimal patterns.
2. We're not checking uses, so we may create more instructions than we eliminate.
3. We should be able to do these transforms with less than full 'fast' fmuls.
llvm-svn: 328152
This is complicated by -0.0 and nan. This is based on the DAG patterns
as shown in D44091. I'm hoping that we can just remove those DAG folds
and always rely on IR canonicalization to handle the matching to fabs.
We would still need to delete the broken code from DAGCombiner to fix
PR36600:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44550
llvm-svn: 327858
Summary:
This pattern came up in PR36682 / D44390
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36682https://reviews.llvm.org/D44390https://godbolt.org/g/oKvT5H
Looking at the IR pattern in question, as per [[ https://github.com/rutgers-apl/alive-nj | alive-nj ]], for all the type combinations i checked
(input: `i16`, `i32`, `i64`; intermediate: `half`/`i16`, `float`/`i32`, `double`/`i64`)
for the following `icmp` comparisons the `uitofp`+`bitcast` can be dropped:
* `eq 0`
* `ne 0`
I did not check vectors, but i'm guessing it's the same there.
{F5889189}
Thus all these cases are in the testcase (along with the vector variant with additional `undef` element in the middle).
There are no negative patterns here (unless alive-nj lied/is broken), all of these should be optimized.
Generated with
{F5889196}
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, efriedma, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44416
llvm-svn: 327534
This was supposed to be an NFC refactoring that will eventually allow
eliminating the isFast() predicate, but there's a rare possibility
that we would pessimize the code as shown in the test case because
we failed to check 'hasOneUse()' properly. This version also removes
an inefficiency of the old code; we would look for:
(X * C) * C1 --> X * (C * C1)
...but that pattern is always handled by
SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative().
llvm-svn: 327404
Summary:
This pattern came up in PR36682:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36682https://godbolt.org/g/LhuD9A
Tests for proposed fix in D44367.
Looking at the IR pattern in question, as per [[ https://github.com/rutgers-apl/alive-nj | alive-nj ]], for all the type combinations i checked
(input: `i16`, `i32`, `i64`; intermediate: `half`/`i16`, `float`/`i32`, `double`/`i64`)
for the following `icmp` comparisons the `sitofp`+`bitcast` can be dropped:
* `eq 0`
* `ne 0`
* `slt 0`
* `sle 0`
* `sge 0`
* `sgt 0`
* `slt 1`
* `sge 1`
* `sle -1`
* `sgt -1`
I did not check vectors, but i'm guessing it's the same there.
{F5887419}
Thus all these cases are in the testcase (along with the vector variant with additional `undef` element in the middle).
There are no negative patterns here (unless alive-nj lied/is broken), all of these should be optimized.
Generated with {F5887551}
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, efriedma, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: nlopes, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44390
llvm-svn: 327301
With the updated LangRef ( D44216 / rL327138 ) in place, we can proceed with more constant folding.
I'm intentionally taking the conservative path here: no matter what the constant or the FMF, we can
always fold to NaN. This is because the undef operand can be chosen as NaN, and in our simplified
default FP env, nothing else happens - NaN just propagates to the result. If we find some way/need
to propagate undef instead, that can be added subsequently.
The tests show that we always choose the same quiet NaN constant (0x7FF8000000000000 in IR text).
There were suggestions to improve that with a 'NaN' string token or not always print a 64-bit hex
value, but those are independent changes. We might also consider setting/propagating the payload of
NaN constants as an enhancement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44308
llvm-svn: 327208
These are uncontroversial and independent of a proposed LangRef edits (D44216).
I tried to fix tests that would fold away:
rL327004
rL327028
rL327030
rL327034
I'm not sure if the Reassociate tests are meaningless yet, but they probably will be
as we add more folds, so if anyone has suggestions or wants to fix those, please do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44258
llvm-svn: 327058
These are based on:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35875
It's not clear if/how instcombine can reduce these,
but we should have the tests here either way to
document current behavior.
llvm-svn: 327039
Using cst_pred_ty in the definition allows us to match vectors with undef elements.
This is a continuation of an effort to make all pattern matchers allow undef elements in vectors:
rL325437
rL325466
D43792
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44076
llvm-svn: 326823
Summary:
Presently, InstCombiner::foldICmpWithCastAndCast() implicitly assumes that it is
only invoked with icmp instructions of integer type. If that assumption is broken,
and it is called with an icmp of vector type, then it fails (asserts/crashes).
This patch addresses the deficiency. It allows it to simplify
icmp (ptrtoint x), (ptrtoint/c) of vector type into a compare of the inputs,
much as is done when the type is integer.
Reviewers: apilipenko, fedor.sergeev, mkazantsev, anna
Reviewed By: anna
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44063
llvm-svn: 326730
This patch teaches getMinimumFPType to support shrinking a vector of ConstantFPs. This should improve our ability to combine vector fptrunc with fp binops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43774
llvm-svn: 326729
The code was checking that all of the instructions in the
sequence are 'fast', but that's not necessary. The final
multiply is all that we need to check (tests adjusted).
The fmul doesn't need to be fully 'fast' either, but that
can be another patch.
llvm-svn: 326608
This narrow fold was added with no motivation or test cases
a bit over 5 years ago. Removing a constant operand is a
good canonicalization? We should handle Y*2.0 too then?
llvm-svn: 326606
If we are only truncating bits from the extend we should be able to just use a smaller extend.
If we are truncating more than the extend we should be able to just use a fptrunc since the presense of the fpextend shouldn't affect rounding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43970
llvm-svn: 326595
This includes the test cases from D43970 and additional tests for combining (fptrunc (binop (fpext), (fpext))) where the pre-extended types don't match the trunc and therefore can't be completely removed.
llvm-svn: 326528
The loads and stores were getting the data and storing the results. There's no reason we can't just use function arguments and return.
llvm-svn: 326515
This is a retry of r326502 with updates to the reassociate
test file that I missed the first time.
@test15_reassoc in the supposed -reassociate test file
(except that it tests 2 other passes too...) shows that
there's no clear responsiblity for reassociation transforms.
Instcombine now gets that case, but only because the
constant values are identical. Otherwise, it would still
miss that pattern.
Reassociate doesn't get that case because it hasn't been
updated to use less than 'fast' FMF.
llvm-svn: 326513
I forgot that I added tests for 'reassoc' to -reassociate, but
suprisingly that file calls -instcombine too, so it is affected.
I'll update that file and try again.
llvm-svn: 326510
