When we simplify at least one operand in the Attributor simplification
we can use the InstSimplify to work on the simplified operands. This
allows us to avoid duplication of the logic.
Depends on D106189
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106190
This change slightly relaxed the current ICP threshold in top-down inliner, specifically always allow one ICP for it. It shows some perf improvements on SPEC and our internal benchmarks. Also renamed the previous flag. We can also try to turn off PGO ICP in the future.
Reviewed By: wenlei, hoy, wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106588
D106185 allows us to determine if a store is needed easily. Using that
knowledge we can start to delete dead stores.
In AAIsDead we now track more state as an instruction can be dead (= the
old optimisitc state) or just "removable". A store instruction can be
removable while being very much alive, e.g., if it stores a constant
into an alloca or internal global. If we would pretend it was dead
instead of only removablewe we would ignore it when we determine what
values a load can see, so that is not what we want.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106188
This patch introduces `getPotentialCopiesOfStoredValue` which uses
AAPointerInfo to determine all "aliases" or "potential copies" of a
value that is stored into memory. This operation can fail but if it
succeeds it means we can visit all "uses" of a value even if it is
temporarily stored in memory.
There are two users for the function:
1) `Attributor::checkForAllUses` which will now ignore the value use
in a store if all "potential copies" can be identified and instead
be visited. This allows various AAs, including AAPointerInfo
itself, to look through memory.
2) `AANoCapture` which uses a custom use tracking through the
CaptureTracker interface and therefore needs to be thought
explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106185
Similar to D105787, this patch tries to fold `__kmpc_parallel_level` if possible.
Note that `__kmpc_parallel_level` doesn't take activeness into consideration,
based on current `deviceRTLs`, its return value can be such as 0, 1, 2, instead
of 0, 129, 130, etc. that also indicate activeness.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106154
While rewriteDeviceCodeStateMachine should probably be folded into
buildCustomStateMachine, we at least need the optimization to happen.
This was not reliably the case in the CGSCC pass but in the Module pass
it seems to work reliably.
This also ports a test to the new kernel encoding (target_init/deinit),
and makes sure we cannot run the kernel in SPMD mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106345
This caused us to rerun AAMemoryBehaviorFloating::updateImpl over and
over again. Unfortunately it turned out to be hard to reproduce the
behavior in a reasonable way.
If we add a new live edge we need to indicate a change or otherwise the
new live block is not shown to users. Similarly, new known dead ends and
a changed `ToBeExploredFrom` set need to cause us to return CHANGED.
Nowadays, simplifycfg pass already tail-merges all the ret blocks together
before doing anything, and it should not increase the count of ret's,
so this is dead code.
Invalid costs can be used to avoid vectorization with a given VF, which is
used for scalable vectors to avoid things that the code-generator cannot
handle. If we override the cost using the -force-target-instruction-cost
option of the LV, we would override this mechanism, rendering the flag useless.
This change ensures the cost is only overriden when the original cost that
was calculated is valid. That allows the flag to be used in combination
with the -scalable-vectorization option.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106677
Summary:
There was an unnecessary variable assigned to the information cache when we
only need it in the constructor to extract the function declaration.
Proposed alternative to D105338.
This is ugly, but short-term I think it's the best way forward: first,
let's formalize the hacks into a coherent model. Then we can consider
extensions of that model (we could have different flavors of volatile
with different rules).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106309
This patch removes RtCheck from RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup to make it
possible to construct RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup objects without a
RuntimePointerChecking object. This should make it easier to
re-use the code to generate runtime checks, e.g. in D102834.
RtCheck was only used to access the pointer info for a given index.
Instead, the start and end expressions can be passed directly.
For code-gen, we also need to know the address space to use. This can
also be explicitly passed at construction.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105481
Scalarization for scalable vectors is not (yet) supported, so the
LV discards a VF when scalarization is chosen as the widening
decision. It should therefore not assert that the VF is not scalable
when it computes the decision to scalarize.
The code can get here when both the interleave-cost, gather/scatter cost
and scalarization-cost are all illegal. This may e.g. happen for SVE
when the VF=1, to avoid generating `<vscale x 1 x eltty>` types that
the code-generator cannot yet handle.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106656
Apparently this fails to line up the types -- try to sidestep the
issue entirely by writing the code in a more reasonable way: Walk
over the operands and perform a set lookup, rather than walking
over the set and performing an operand scan.
We could try harder to screen out libcalls by
function signature (and that would be a much larger
change than for sprintf alone), but that might make
the transition to type-less pointers more difficult.
https://llvm.org/PR51200
Separate out the BCECmp part from BCECmpBlock, which just stores
the comparison atoms without the branch instruction. At the same
time switch the code to return Optional<> rather than objects in
invalid state and partially constructed objects.
This fixes an issue that was found in D105199, where a GEP instruction
is used both as the address of a store, as well as the value of a store.
For the former, the value is scalar after vectorization, but the latter
(as value) requires widening.
Other code in that function seems to prevent similar cases from happening,
but it seems this case was missed.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106164
This reverts the revert commit b1777b04dc4b1a9fee0e7effa7e177892ab32ef0.
The patch originally got reverted due to a crash:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1232798#c2
The underlying issue was that we were not using the stored values from
the modified memory recipes, but the out-of-date values directly from
the IR (accessed via the VPlan). This should be fixed in d995d6376. A
reduced version of the reproducer has been added in 93664503be6b.
This adjusts mayHaveSideEffect() to return true for !willReturn()
instructions. Just like other side-effects, non-willreturn calls
(aka "divergence") cannot be removed and cannot be reordered relative
to other side effects. This fixes a number of bugs where
non-willreturn calls are either incorrectly dropped or moved. In
particular, it also fixes the last open problem in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50511.
I performed a cursory review of all current mayHaveSideEffect()
uses, which convinced me that these are indeed the desired default
semantics. Places that do not want to consider non-willreturn as a
sideeffect generally do not want mayHaveSideEffect() semantics at
all. I identified two such cases, which are addressed by D106591
and D106742. Finally, there is a use in SCEV for which we don't
really have an appropriate API right now -- what it wants is
basically "would this be considered forward progress". I've just
spelled out the previous semantics there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106749
Need to fix several cost-related problems. The final type may be defined
incorrectly because of to early definition (we may end up with the wider
type), the CommonCost should not be redefined in ExtractElements
cost related calculations and the shuffle of the final insertelements
vectors should be calculated as a cost of single vector permutations
+ costs of two vector permutations for other n-1 incoming vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106578
isSafeToSpeculateStore() looks for a preceding store to the same
location to make sure that introducing a new store of the same
value is safe. It currently bails on intervening mayHaveSideEffect()
instructions. However, I believe just checking mayWriteToMemory()
is sufficient there -- we just need to make sure that we know which
value was stored, we don't care if we can unwind in the meantime.
While looking into this, I started having some doubts about the
correctness of the transform with regard to thread safety. While
we don't try to hoist non-simple stores, I believe we also need
to make sure that the preceding store is simple as well. Otherwise
we could introduce a spurious non-atomic write after an atomic write
-- under our memory model this would result in a subsequent undef
atomic read, even if the second write stores the same value as the
first.
Example: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/q_3YAL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106742
Fixes more casts to `<FixedVectorType>` for the cases where the
instruction is a Insert/ExtractElementInst.
For fixed-width, this part of truncateToMinimalBitWidths is tested by
AArch64/type-shrinkage-insertelt.ll. I attempted to write a test case for this part
of truncateToMinimalBitWidths which uses scalable vectors, but was unable to add
one. The tests in type-shrinkage-insertelt.ll rely on scalarization to create extract
element instructions for instance, which is not possible for scalable vectors.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106163
Need to fix several cost-related problems. The final type may be defined
incorrectly because of to early definition (we may end up with the wider
type), the CommonCost should not be redefined in ExtractElements
cost related calculations and the shuffle of the final insertelements
vectors should be calculated as a cost of single vector permutations
+ costs of two vector permutations for other n-1 incoming vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106578
Instead of getting the VPValue for the stored IR values through the
current plan, use the stored value of the recipes directly.
This way, the correct VPValues are used if the store recipes have been
modified in the VPlan and the IR value is not correct any longer. This
can happen, e.g. due to D105008.
Add folds to instcombine to support the removal of select instruction when the masked_load is guaranteed to zero the same lanes, i.e. select(mask, mload(,,mask,0), 0) -> mload(,,mask,0).
Patch originally authored by @paulwalker-arm
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106376
I have added a new FastMathFlags parameter to getArithmeticReductionCost
to indicate what type of reduction we are performing:
1. Tree-wise. This is the typical fast-math reduction that involves
continually splitting a vector up into halves and adding each
half together until we get a scalar result. This is the default
behaviour for integers, whereas for floating point we only do this
if reassociation is allowed.
2. Ordered. This now allows us to estimate the cost of performing
a strict vector reduction by treating it as a series of scalar
operations in lane order. This is the case when FP reassociation
is not permitted. For scalable vectors this is more difficult
because at compile time we do not know how many lanes there are,
and so we use the worst case maximum vscale value.
I have also fixed getTypeBasedIntrinsicInstrCost to pass in the
FastMathFlags, which meant fixing up some X86 tests where we always
assumed the vector.reduce.fadd/mul intrinsics were 'fast'.
New tests have been added here:
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/reduce-fadd.ll
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-intrinsics.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/strict-fadd-cost.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-strict-fadd-cost.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105432
If the branch isn't `unpredictable`, and it is predicted to *not* branch
to the block we are considering speculatively executing,
then it seems counter-productive to execute the code that is predicted not to be executed.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106650
Makes clang crash: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105008#2903350
This reverts commit d2a73fb44ea0b8c981e4b923f811f18793fc4770.
Also revert a minor formatting follow-up:
This reverts commit 82834a673246f27a541ffcc57e0eb65b008102ef.
This patch introduces a new RAII struct that will temporarily make an OpenMP
RTL function have external linkage. This is done before the attributor is
invoked to prevent it from incorrectly removing some function definitions that
we will use later. For example, if we determine all calls to one function are
dead, because it has internal linkage it can safely be removed. Later when we
try to get an instance to that function to modify the source using
`getOrCreateRuntimeFunction` we will then get an empty declaration for that
function that won't be defined anywhere. This patch prevents this from
occurring.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106707
Rather than adding methods for dropping these attributes in
various places, add a function that returns an AttrBuilder with
these attributes, which can then be used with existing methods
for dropping attributes. This is with an eye on D104641, which
also needs to drop them from returns, not just parameters.
Also be more explicit about the semantics of the method in the
documentation. Refer to UB rather than Undef, which is what this
is actually about.
Bug Fix for PR: https://llvm.org/PR47960
This patch makes sure that the fast math flag used in the 'select'
instruction is the same as the 'fabs' instruction after the transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101727
In D106041, a freeze was added before the branch condition to solve the miscompilation problem of SimpleLoopUnswitch.
However, I found that the added freeze disturbed other optimizations in the following situations.
```
arg.fr = freeze(arg)
use(arg.fr)
...
use(arg)
```
It is a problem that occurred when arg and arg.fr were recognized as different values.
Therefore, changing to use arg.fr instead of arg throughout the function eliminates the above problem.
Thus, I add a function that changes all uses of arg to freeze(arg) to visitFreeze of InstCombine.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106233
This patch introduces a pass that uses the Attributor to deduce AMDGPU specific attributes.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104997
checkForAllInstructions was not handling declarations correctly.
It should have been returning false when it gets called on a declaration
The patch also fixes a test case for AAFunctionReachability for it to be able
to pass after the changes to the checkForAllinstructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106625
Otherwise e.g. the FoldTwoEntryPHINode() has to do a lot of legwork
to re-deduce what is the dominant block (i.e. for which block
is this branch the terminator).
The check for sinking instructions past the load + cmp sequence
currently checks for side-effects, which includes writing to memory
and unwinding. However, I don't believe we care about sinking the
instructions past an unwind (as they don't have any side-effects
themselves).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106591
