When we simplify at least one operand in the Attributor simplification
we can use the InstSimplify to work on the simplified operands. This
allows us to avoid duplication of the logic.
Depends on D106189
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106190
This change slightly relaxed the current ICP threshold in top-down inliner, specifically always allow one ICP for it. It shows some perf improvements on SPEC and our internal benchmarks. Also renamed the previous flag. We can also try to turn off PGO ICP in the future.
Reviewed By: wenlei, hoy, wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106588
D106185 allows us to determine if a store is needed easily. Using that
knowledge we can start to delete dead stores.
In AAIsDead we now track more state as an instruction can be dead (= the
old optimisitc state) or just "removable". A store instruction can be
removable while being very much alive, e.g., if it stores a constant
into an alloca or internal global. If we would pretend it was dead
instead of only removablewe we would ignore it when we determine what
values a load can see, so that is not what we want.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106188
This patch introduces `getPotentialCopiesOfStoredValue` which uses
AAPointerInfo to determine all "aliases" or "potential copies" of a
value that is stored into memory. This operation can fail but if it
succeeds it means we can visit all "uses" of a value even if it is
temporarily stored in memory.
There are two users for the function:
1) `Attributor::checkForAllUses` which will now ignore the value use
in a store if all "potential copies" can be identified and instead
be visited. This allows various AAs, including AAPointerInfo
itself, to look through memory.
2) `AANoCapture` which uses a custom use tracking through the
CaptureTracker interface and therefore needs to be thought
explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106185
This reverts commit 0a37163d1d855a2db41e1f46ddbc3f4570bd7ca6.
Reason: Broke the sanitizer msan bots. More details are available in the
original Phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106814.
Similar to D105787, this patch tries to fold `__kmpc_parallel_level` if possible.
Note that `__kmpc_parallel_level` doesn't take activeness into consideration,
based on current `deviceRTLs`, its return value can be such as 0, 1, 2, instead
of 0, 129, 130, etc. that also indicate activeness.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106154
While rewriteDeviceCodeStateMachine should probably be folded into
buildCustomStateMachine, we at least need the optimization to happen.
This was not reliably the case in the CGSCC pass but in the Module pass
it seems to work reliably.
This also ports a test to the new kernel encoding (target_init/deinit),
and makes sure we cannot run the kernel in SPMD mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106345
Enable custom insert_subvector for larger vector types.
This is necessary now that SelectionDAG can attempt v3f64 insert
to v4f64, etc.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105385
All floating point values in registers are in double precision
representation. In order to materialize the correct single precision
value, we need to convert the APFloat that represents the value
to double precision first.
Reviewed By: amyk, NeHuang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106812
This adds support for the case where
WideSize = DstSize + K * SrcSize
In this case, we can pad the G_MERGE_VALUES instruction with K extra undef
values with width SrcSize. Then the destination can be handled via
widenScalarDst.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106814
Before MASSV only supported P8 and P9 on AIX ans Linux . This patch proposes
MASSV to add support of P7 and P10 only on AIX too.
Differential: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106678
Use it AArch64 post-legal combiner. These don't always get folded because when
the instructions are created the constants are obscured by artifacts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106776
When Emscripten EH mixes with Emscripten SjLj, we are not currently
handling some of them correctly. There are three cases:
1. The current function calls `setjmp` and there is an `invoke` to a
function that can either throw or longjmp. In this case, we have to
check both for exception and longjmp. We are currently handling this
case correctly:
0c0eb76782/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L1058-L1090)
When inserting routines for functions that can longjmp, which we do
only for setjmp-calling functions, we check if the function was
previously an `invoke` and handle it correctly.
2. The current function does NOT call `setjmp` and there is an `invoke`
to a function that can either throw or longjmp. Because there is no
`setjmp` call, we haven't been doing any check for functions that can
longjmp. But in that case, for `invoke`, we only check for an
exception and if it is not an exception we reset `__THREW__` to 0,
which can silently swallow the longjmp:
0c0eb76782/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L70-L80)
This CL fixes this.
3. The current function calls `setjmp` and there is no `invoke`. Because
it is not an `invoke`, we haven't been doing any check for functions
that can throw, and only insert longjmp-checking routines for
functions that can longjmp. But in that case, if a longjmpable
function throws, we only check for a longjmp so if it is not a
longjmp we reset `__THREW__` to 0, which can silently swallow the
exception:
0c0eb76782/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyLowerEmscriptenEHSjLj.cpp (L156-L169)
This CL fixes this.
To do that, this moves around some code, so we register necessary
functions for both EH and SjLj and precompute some data (the set of
functions that contains `setjmp`) before doing actual EH or SjLj
transformation.
This CL makes 2nd and 3rd tests in
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/14732 work.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106525
This fixes an assert firing when compiling code which involves 128 bit
integrals.
This would trigger runtime checks similar to this:
```
Assertion failed: getMinSignedBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for int64_t", file llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h, line 1646
```
To get around this, we just saturate those big values.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105320
Add td definitions and asm/disasm tests for the addex instruction introduced in
ISA 3.0.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, amyk, NeHuang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106666
Invalid costs can be used to avoid vectorization with a given VF, which is
used for scalable vectors to avoid things that the code-generator cannot
handle. If we override the cost using the -force-target-instruction-cost
option of the LV, we would override this mechanism, rendering the flag useless.
This change ensures the cost is only overriden when the original cost that
was calculated is valid. That allows the flag to be used in combination
with the -scalable-vectorization option.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106677
This change moves most of `sve-inductions.ll` to non-AArch64 specific
LV tests using the `-target-supports-scalable-vectors` flag, because they're
not explicitly AArch64-specific. One test builds on AArch64-specific
knowledge regarding masked loads/stores, and remains in sve-inductions.ll.
This is a followup patch for D105930 to add implicit-def of RM for
mtfsb[01] instructions as per review comments.
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106603
Proposed alternative to D105338.
This is ugly, but short-term I think it's the best way forward: first,
let's formalize the hacks into a coherent model. Then we can consider
extensions of that model (we could have different flavors of volatile
with different rules).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106309
The legalizer generates selects for some operations, which can have constant
condition values, resulting in lots of dead code if it's not folded away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106762
During tail duplication, SSA values may be updated and have their uses
replaced with a virtual register, and any debug instructions that use
that value are deleted. This patch fixes the implementation of the debug
instruction deletion to work correctly for debug instructions that use
the SSA value multiple times, by batching deletions so that we don't
attempt to delete the same instruction twice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106557
The getOrderedReductionCost implementation introduced in D105432 calls the CRTP base version getArithmeticInstrCost instead of the redirecting to the target version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106795
Scalarization for scalable vectors is not (yet) supported, so the
LV discards a VF when scalarization is chosen as the widening
decision. It should therefore not assert that the VF is not scalable
when it computes the decision to scalarize.
The code can get here when both the interleave-cost, gather/scatter cost
and scalarization-cost are all illegal. This may e.g. happen for SVE
when the VF=1, to avoid generating `<vscale x 1 x eltty>` types that
the code-generator cannot yet handle.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106656
See [GRP_COMDAT group with STB_LOCAL signature](https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/2X6mR-s2zoc)
objcopy PR: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27931
GRP_COMDAT deduplication is purely based on the signature symbol name in
ld.lld/GNU ld/gold. The local/global status is not part of the equation.
If the signature symbol is localized by --localize-hidden or
--keep-global-symbol, the intention is likely to make the group fully
localized. Drop GRP_COMDAT to suppress deduplication.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106782
For reg+imm SVE addressing mode imm is implictly scaled by VL,
making them impractical for truely immediate offsets. However, if
the offset can be unscaled based on the storage element type we
can use the reg+reg SVE addressing mode and thus either reduce the
number of generate add instructions or replace them with a mov
instruction that can be hoisted from the hot code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106744
We could try harder to screen out libcalls by
function signature (and that would be a much larger
change than for sprintf alone), but that might make
the transition to type-less pointers more difficult.
https://llvm.org/PR51200
This fixes an issue that was found in D105199, where a GEP instruction
is used both as the address of a store, as well as the value of a store.
For the former, the value is scalar after vectorization, but the latter
(as value) requires widening.
Other code in that function seems to prevent similar cases from happening,
but it seems this case was missed.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106164
This patch adds support for the next-generation arch14
CPU architecture to the SystemZ backend.
This includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Detection of arch14 as host processor.
- Assembler/disassembler support for new instructions.
- New LLVM intrinsics for certain new instructions.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
- New high-level intrinsics in vecintrin.h.
- Indicate support by defining __VEC__ == 10304.
Note: No currently available Z system supports the arch14
architecture. Once new systems become available, the
official system name will be added as supported -march name.
This reverts the revert commit b1777b04dc4b1a9fee0e7effa7e177892ab32ef0.
The patch originally got reverted due to a crash:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1232798#c2
The underlying issue was that we were not using the stored values from
the modified memory recipes, but the out-of-date values directly from
the IR (accessed via the VPlan). This should be fixed in d995d6376. A
reduced version of the reproducer has been added in 93664503be6b.
This adjusts mayHaveSideEffect() to return true for !willReturn()
instructions. Just like other side-effects, non-willreturn calls
(aka "divergence") cannot be removed and cannot be reordered relative
to other side effects. This fixes a number of bugs where
non-willreturn calls are either incorrectly dropped or moved. In
particular, it also fixes the last open problem in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50511.
I performed a cursory review of all current mayHaveSideEffect()
uses, which convinced me that these are indeed the desired default
semantics. Places that do not want to consider non-willreturn as a
sideeffect generally do not want mayHaveSideEffect() semantics at
all. I identified two such cases, which are addressed by D106591
and D106742. Finally, there is a use in SCEV for which we don't
really have an appropriate API right now -- what it wants is
basically "would this be considered forward progress". I've just
spelled out the previous semantics there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106749
Late in SelectionDAG we join up instruction numbers with their defining
instructions, if it couldn't be done during the main part of SelectionDAG.
One exception is function arguments, where we have to point a DBG_PHI
instruction at the incoming live register, as they don't have a defining
instruction. This patch adds another exception, for constant physregs, like
aarch64 has.
It may seem wasteful to use two instructions where we could use a single
DBG_VALUE, however the whole point of instruction referencing is to
decouple the identification of values from the specification of where
variable location ranges start.
(Part of my aarch64 work to ease adoption of instruction referencing, as
in the meta comment on D104520)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104520
Need to fix several cost-related problems. The final type may be defined
incorrectly because of to early definition (we may end up with the wider
type), the CommonCost should not be redefined in ExtractElements
cost related calculations and the shuffle of the final insertelements
vectors should be calculated as a cost of single vector permutations
+ costs of two vector permutations for other n-1 incoming vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106578
