One of these two changes is exposing (or causing) some more miscompiles.
A reproducer is in progress, so reverting until resolved.
This reverts commit 428f36401b1b695fd501ebfdc8773bed8ced8d4e.
This reverts commit 37b8f09a4b61bf9bf9d0b9017d790c8b82be2e17,
and returns commit 1bd0b82e508d049efdb07f4f8a342f35818df341.
The miscompile was in InstCombine, and it has been addressed.
This tries to approach the problem noted by @arsenm:
terrible codegen for `__builtin_fpclassify()`:
https://godbolt.org/z/388zqdE37
Just because the PHI in the common successor happens to have different
incoming values for these two blocks, doesn't mean we have to give up.
It's quite easy to deal with this, we just need to produce a select:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/000srb
Now, the cost model for this transform is rather overly strict,
so this will basically never fire. We tally all (over all preds)
the selects needed to the NumBonusInsts
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139275
This tries to approach the problem noted by @arsenm:
terrible codegen for `__builtin_fpclassify()`:
https://godbolt.org/z/388zqdE37
Just because the PHI in the common successor happens to have different
incoming values for these two blocks, doesn't mean we have to give up.
It's quite easy to deal with this, we just need to produce a select:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/000srb
Now, the cost model for this transform is rather overly strict,
so this will basically never fire. We tally all (over all preds)
the selects needed to the NumBonusInsts
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139275
The LIT test cases were migrated with the script provided by
Nikita Popov. Due to the size of the change it is split into
several parts.
Reviewed By: nemanja, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135474
This patch fixes the following two bugs in `PPCInstrInfo::isSignOrZeroExtended` helper, which is used from sign-/zero-extension elimination in PPCMIPeephole pass.
- Registers defined by load with update (e.g. LBZU) were identified as already sign or zero-extended. But it is true only for the first def (loaded value) and not for the second def (i.e. updated pointer).
- Registers defined by ORIS/XORIS were identified as already sign-extended. But, it is not true for sign extension depending on the immediate (while it is ok for zero extension).
To handle the first case, the parameter for the helpers is changed from `MachineInstr` to a register number to distinguish first and second defs. Also, this patch moves the initialization of PPCMIPeepholePass to allow mir test case.
Reviewed By: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40554
The commit at https://reviews.llvm.org/rL315888 is causing some failures
with internal testing. Disabling this code until we can resolve the issues.
llvm-svn: 316199
This patch enables redundant sign- and zero-extension elimination in PowerPC MI Peephole pass.
If the input value of a sign- or zero-extension is known to be already sign- or zero-extended, the operation is redundant and can be eliminated.
One common case is sign-extensions for a method parameter or for a method return value; they must be sign- or zero-extended as defined in PPC ELF ABI.
For example of the following simple code, two extsw instructions are generated before the invocation of int_func and before the return. With this patch, both extsw are eliminated.
void int_func(int);
void ii_test(int a) {
if (a & 1) return int_func(a);
}
Such redundant sign- or zero-extensions are quite common in many programs; e.g. I observed about 60,000 occurrences of the elimination while compiling the LLVM+CLANG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31319
llvm-svn: 315888
