1280 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Arthur Eubanks
8c5a44901c [OpaquePtr] Remove existing support for forward compatibility
It assumes that PointerType will keep having an optional pointee type,
but we'd like to remove the pointee type in PointerType at some point.

I feel like the current implementation could be simplified anyway,
although perhaps I'm underestimating the amount of work needed
throughout BitcodeReader.

We will still need a side table to keep track of pointee types. This
will be reimplemented at some point.

This is essentially a revert of a4771e9d (which doesn't look like it was
reviewed anyway).

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103135
2021-06-14 10:52:56 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
1202f559bd [OpaquePtr] Make atomicrmw work with opaque pointers
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
2021-05-25 20:16:21 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
ad90a6be21 [OpaquePtr] Create new bitcode encoding for atomicrmw
Since the opaque pointer type won't contain the pointee type, we need to
separately encode the value type for an atomicrmw.

Emit this new code for atomicrmw.

Handle this new code and the old one in the bitcode reader.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103123
2021-05-25 16:30:34 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
0bbb502daa Revert "[OpaquePtr] Make atomicrmw work with opaque pointers"
This reverts commit 0bebda17bea38785c90a6fec3ca01cf74eb78b7c.

Causing "Invalid record" errors.
2021-05-25 10:14:58 -07:00
Marco Elver
280333021e [SanitizeCoverage] Add support for NoSanitizeCoverage function attribute
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other
sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel
mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to
remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to
continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we
must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function
attributes.

Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a
sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but
rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got
"automatic" no_sanitize attribute support.

Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string
"coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as
unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative
function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information
through to the instrumentation pass.

Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035

Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
2021-05-25 12:57:14 +02:00
Arthur Eubanks
7a29a12301 [Verifier] Move some atomicrmw/cmpxchg checks to instruction creation
These checks already exist as asserts when creating the corresponding
instruction. Anybody creating these instructions already need to take
care to not break these checks.

Move the checks for success/failure ordering in cmpxchg from the
verifier to the LLParser and BitcodeReader plus an assert.

Add some tests for cmpxchg ordering. The .bc files are created from the
.ll files with an llvm-as with these checks disabled.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102803
2021-05-21 13:41:17 -07:00
Steven Wu
5b6cae5524 [IR][AutoUpgrade] Drop alignment from non-pointer parameters and returns
This is a follow-up of D102201. After some discussion, it is a better idea
to upgrade all invalid uses of alignment attributes on function return
values and parameters, not just limited to void function return types.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102726
2021-05-20 09:54:38 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
0bebda17be [OpaquePtr] Make atomicrmw work with opaque pointers
FullTy is only necessary when we need to figure out what type an
instruction works with given a pointer's pointee type. However, we just
end up using the value operand's type, so FullTy isn't necessary.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102788
2021-05-19 12:49:28 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
28b9771472 [OpaquePtr] Make GEPs work with opaque pointers
No verifier changes needed, the verifier currently doesn't check that
the pointer operand's pointee type matches the GEP type. There is a
similar check in GetElementPtrInst::Create() though.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102744
2021-05-19 12:39:37 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
6013d84392 [OpaquePtr] Make loads and stores work with opaque pointers
Don't check that types match when the pointer operand is an opaque
pointer.

I would separate the Assembler and Verifier changes, but
verify-uselistorder in the Assembler test ends up running the verifier.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102450
2021-05-18 13:43:50 -07:00
Tim Northover
ea0eec69f1 IR+AArch64: add a "swiftasync" argument attribute.
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that
parameter, passed in X22.

The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001
in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect
of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three
values there:

  * 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR]
  * 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR]
  * 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.

All other values are currently reserved.

If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the
discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.

There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing
front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr
if necessary).
2021-05-14 11:43:58 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
2155dc51d7 [IR] Introduce the opaque pointer type
The opaque pointer type is essentially just a normal pointer type with a
null pointee type.

This also adds support for the opaque pointer type to the bitcode
reader/writer, as well as to textual IR.

To avoid confusion with existing pointer types, we disallow creating a
pointer to an opaque pointer.

Opaque pointer types should not be widely used at this point since many
parts of LLVM still do not support them. The next steps are to add some
very simple use cases of opaque pointers to make sure they work, then
start pretending that all pointers are opaque pointers and see what
breaks.

https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-May/150359.html

Reviewed By: dblaikie, dexonsmith, pcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101704
2021-05-13 15:22:27 -07:00
cynecx
8ec9fd4839 Support unwinding from inline assembly
I've taken the following steps to add unwinding support from inline assembly:

1) Add a new `unwind` "attribute" (like `sideeffect`) to the asm syntax:

```
invoke void asm sideeffect unwind "call thrower", "~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"()
    to label %exit unwind label %uexit
```

2.) Add Bitcode writing/reading support + LLVM-IR parsing.

3.) Emit EHLabels around inline assembly lowering (SelectionDAGBuilder + GlobalISel) when `InlineAsm::canThrow` is enabled.

4.) Tweak InstCombineCalls/InlineFunction pass to not mark inline assembly "calls" as nounwind.

5.) Add clang support by introducing a new clobber: "unwind", which lower to the `canThrow` being enabled.

6.) Don't allow unwinding callbr.

Reviewed By: Amanieu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95745
2021-05-13 19:13:03 +01:00
Steven Wu
4eff946947 [IR][AutoUpgrade] Drop align attribute from void return types
Since D87304, `align` become an invalid attribute on none pointer types and
verifier will reject bitcode that has invalid `align` attribute.

The problem is before the change, DeadArgumentElimination can easily
turn a pointer return type into a void return type without removing
`align` attribute. Teach Autograde to remove invalid `align` attribute
from return types to maintain bitcode compatibility.

rdar://77022993

Reviewed By: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102201
2021-05-11 08:23:55 -07:00
Matt Arsenault
9a0c9402fa Reapply "OpaquePtr: Turn inalloca into a type attribute"
This reverts commit 07e46367baeca96d84b03fa215b41775f69d5989.
2021-03-29 08:55:30 -04:00
Oliver Stannard
07e46367ba Revert "Reapply "OpaquePtr: Turn inalloca into a type attribute""
Reverting because test 'Bindings/Go/go.test' is failing on most
buildbots.

This reverts commit fc9df309917e57de704f3ce4372138a8d4a23d7a.
2021-03-29 11:32:22 +01:00
Matt Arsenault
fc9df30991 Reapply "OpaquePtr: Turn inalloca into a type attribute"
This reverts commit 20d5c42e0ef5d252b434bcb610b04f1cb79fe771.
2021-03-28 13:35:21 -04:00
Nico Weber
20d5c42e0e Revert "OpaquePtr: Turn inalloca into a type attribute"
This reverts commit 4fefed65637ec46c8c2edad6b07b5569ac61e9e5.
Broke check-clang everywhere.
2021-03-28 13:02:52 -04:00
Matt Arsenault
4fefed6563 OpaquePtr: Turn inalloca into a type attribute
I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
2021-03-28 11:12:23 -04:00
Bradley Smith
48f5a392cb [IR] Add vscale_range IR function attribute
This attribute represents the minimum and maximum values vscale can
take. For now this attribute is not hooked up to anything during
codegen, this will be added in the future when such codegen is
considered stable.

Additionally hook up the -msve-vector-bits=<x> clang option to emit this
attribute.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98030
2021-03-22 12:05:06 +00:00
Leonard Chan
1c932baeaa [llvm][Bitcode] Add bitcode reader/writer for DSOLocalEquivalent
This is necessary for compilation with [thin]lto.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96170
2021-02-22 10:37:57 -08:00
Wei Wang
80dc0661bd [LTO] Perform DSOLocal propagation in combined index
Perform DSOLocal propagation within summary list of every GV. This
avoids the repeated query of this information during function
importing.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96398
2021-02-12 22:58:26 -08:00
James Y Knight
db00953ff3 Fix bitcode decoder error in "Encode alignment attribute for atomicrmw"
The wrong record field number was being used in bitcode decoding,
which broke a self-hosted LTO build. (Yet, somehow, this _doesn't_
seem to have broken simple bitcode encode/decode roundtrip tests, and
I'm not sure why...)

Fixes commit d06ab79816785fa362e7d96d7a398bea8064cba7
2021-02-11 22:29:03 -05:00
Guillaume Chatelet
17517f3178 Encode alignment attribute for cmpxchg
This is a follow up patch to D83136 adding the align attribute to `cmpxchg`.
See also D83465 for `atomicrmw`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87443
2021-02-11 15:17:50 -05:00
Guillaume Chatelet
d06ab79816 Encode alignment attribute for atomicrmw
This is a follow up patch to D83136 adding the align attribute to `atomicwmw`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83465
2021-02-11 15:17:37 -05:00
Fangrui Song
54fb3ca96e [ThinLTO] Add Visibility bits to GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags
Imported functions and variable get the visibility from the module supplying the
definition.  However, non-imported definitions do not get the visibility from
(ELF) the most constraining visibility among all modules (Mach-O) the visibility
of the prevailing definition.

This patch

* adds visibility bits to GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags
* computes the result visibility and propagates it to all definitions

Protected/hidden can imply dso_local which can enable some optimizations (this
is stronger than GVFlags::DSOLocal because the implied dso_local can be
leveraged for ELF -shared while default visibility dso_local has to be cleared
for ELF -shared).

Note: we don't have summaries for declarations, so for ELF if a declaration has
the most constraining visibility, the result visibility may not be that one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92900
2021-01-27 10:43:51 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
16baad8f4e [llvm] Use pop_back_val (NFC) 2021-01-24 12:18:57 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
1d0bc05551 [llvm] Use llvm::append_range (NFC) 2021-01-06 18:27:33 -08:00
Luo, Yuanke
981a0bd858 [X86] Add x86_amx type for intel AMX.
The x86_amx is used for AMX intrisics. <256 x i32> is bitcast to x86_amx when
it is used by AMX intrinsics, and x86_amx is bitcast to <256 x i32> when it
is used by load/store instruction. So amx intrinsics only operate on type x86_amx.
It can help to separate amx intrinsics from llvm IR instructions (+-*/).
Thank Craig for the idea. This patch depend on https://reviews.llvm.org/D87981.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91927
2020-12-30 13:52:13 +08:00
Rong Xu
3733463dbb [IR][PGO] Add hot func attribute and use hot/cold attribute in func section
Clang FE currently has hot/cold function attribute. But we only have
cold function attribute in LLVM IR.

This patch adds support of hot function attribute to LLVM IR.  This
attribute will be used in setting function section prefix/suffix.
Currently .hot and .unlikely suffix only are added in PGO (Sample PGO)
compilation (through isFunctionHotInCallGraph and
isFunctionColdInCallGraph).

This patch changes the behavior. The new behavior is:
(1) If the user annotates a function as hot or isFunctionHotInCallGraph
    is true, this function will be marked as hot. Otherwise,
(2) If the user annotates a function as cold or
    isFunctionColdInCallGraph is true, this function will be marked as
    cold.

The changes are:
(1) user annotated function attribute will used in setting function
    section prefix/suffix.
(2) hot attribute overwrites profile count based hotness.
(3) profile count based hotness overwrite user annotated cold attribute.

The intention for these changes is to provide the user a way to mark
certain function as hot in cases where training input is hard to cover
all the hot functions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92493
2020-12-17 18:41:12 -08:00
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri
7c0e3a77bc [clang][IR] Add support for leaf attribute
This patch adds support for leaf attribute as an optimization hint
in Clang/LLVM.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90275
2020-12-14 14:48:17 -08:00
Fangrui Song
b5ad32ef5c Migrate deprecated DebugLoc::get to DILocation::get
This migrates all LLVM (except Kaleidoscope and
CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp) DebugLoc::get to DILocation::get.

The CodeGen/StackProtector.cpp usage may have a nullptr Scope
and can trigger an assertion failure, so I don't migrate it.

Reviewed By: #debug-info, dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93087
2020-12-11 12:45:22 -08:00
Zhengyang Liu
75f50e15bf Adding PoisonValue for representing poison value explicitly in IR
Define ConstantData::PoisonValue.
Add support for poison value to LLLexer/LLParser/BitcodeReader/BitcodeWriter.
Add support for poison value to llvm-c interface.
Add support for poison value to OCaml binding.
Add m_Poison in PatternMatch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71126
2020-11-25 17:33:51 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
dd6087cac0 Revert "[BitCode] decode nossp fn attr"
This reverts commit 0b11d018cc2f2c6bea5dac8dc72140cdb502ca02.

Going with a simpler approach.
2020-11-17 17:27:14 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim
5bf45ee156 BitcodeReader::popValue - pass SmallVectorImpl<> as const reference. NFCI.
Fixes cppcheck warning.
2020-10-30 14:33:19 +00:00
Nick Desaulniers
0b11d018cc [BitCode] decode nossp fn attr
I missed this in https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956.

Reviewed By: void

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90177
2020-10-26 13:06:54 -07:00
Atmn Patel
595c615606 [IR] Adds mustprogress as a LLVM IR attribute
This adds the LLVM IR attribute `mustprogress` as defined in LangRef through D86233. This attribute will be applied to functions with in languages like C++ where forward progress is guaranteed. Functions without this attribute are not required to make progress.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85393
2020-10-20 03:09:57 -04:00
Matt Arsenault
0a7cd99a70 Reapply "OpaquePtr: Add type to sret attribute"
This reverts commit eb9f7c28e5fe6d75fed3587023e17f2997c8024b.

Previously this was incorrectly handling linking of the contained
type, so this merges the fixes from D88973.
2020-10-16 11:05:02 -04:00
Sam McCall
b953a01b2c Reapply [ADT] function_ref's constructor is unavailable if the argument is not callable.
This reverts commit 281703e67ffaee8e26efef86e0df3e145477f4cb.

GCC 5.4 bugs are worked around by avoiding use of variable templates.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88977
2020-10-07 18:31:12 +02:00
Sam McCall
281703e67f Revert "[ADT] function_ref's constructor is unavailable if the argument is not callable."
This reverts commit 4cae6228d129d4c4dfb156c043977bb6b5690031.

Breaks GCC build:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/8/builds/33/steps/6/logs/stdio
2020-10-07 16:37:13 +02:00
Sam McCall
4cae6228d1 [ADT] function_ref's constructor is unavailable if the argument is not callable.
This allows overload sets containing function_ref arguments to work correctly
Otherwise they're ambiguous as anything "could be" converted to a function_ref.

This matches proposed std::function_ref, absl::function_ref, etc.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88901
2020-10-07 16:31:09 +02:00
Tres Popp
eb9f7c28e5 Revert "OpaquePtr: Add type to sret attribute"
This reverts commit 55c4ff91bd820d72014f63dcf7f3d5a0d3397986.

Issues were introduced as discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88241
where this change made previous bugs in the linker and BitCodeWriter
visible.
2020-09-29 10:31:04 +02:00
Matt Arsenault
55c4ff91bd OpaquePtr: Add type to sret attribute
Make the corresponding change that was made for byval in
b7141207a483d39b99c2b4da4eb3bb591eca9e1a. Like byval, this requires a
bulk update of the test IR tests to include the type before this can
be mandatory.
2020-09-25 14:07:30 -04:00
Guillaume Chatelet
5a4a0cfcfb [NFC] Separate bitcode reading for FUNC_CODE_INST_CMPXCHG(_OLD)
This is preparatory work to unable storing alignment for AtomicCmpXchgInst.
See D83136 for context and bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27168

This is the fixed version of D83375, which was submitted and reverted.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87373
2020-09-09 19:10:30 +00:00
Vitaly Buka
fc4fd89852 [StackSafety] Use ValueInfo in ParamAccess::Call
This avoid GUID lookup in Index.findSummaryInModule.
Follow up for D81242.

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85269
2020-08-14 12:42:44 -07:00
Guillaume Chatelet
754deffd11 [NFC] Move BitcodeCommon.h from Bitstream to Bitcode 2020-07-27 20:49:17 +00:00
Guillaume Chatelet
1b4d24912a [NFC] Replace ".size() < 1" with ".empty()" 2020-07-27 13:54:53 +00:00
Guillaume Chatelet
d9bbe85943 [Alignment][NFC] Update Bitcodewriter to use Align
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83533
2020-07-27 08:16:45 +00:00
Steven Wu
ac375c2fe3 [Bitcode] Avoid duplicating linker option when upgrading
Summary:
The upgrading path from old ModuleFlag based linker options to the new
NamedMetadata based linker option in in materializeMetadata() which gets
called once for the module and once for every GV. The linker options are
getting dup'ed every time and it can create massive amount of the linker
options in the object file that gets created from old bitcode. Fix the
problem by checking if the new option exists or not before upgrade
again.

rdar://64543389

Reviewers: pcc, t.p.northover, dexonsmith, arphaman

Reviewed By: arphaman

Subscribers: hiraditya, jkorous, ributzka, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83688
2020-07-23 13:07:28 -07:00
Steven Wu
78709345fb [Bitcode] Drop invalid branch_weight in BitcodeReader
Summary:
If bitcode reader gets an invalid branch weight, drop that from the
inputs. This allows us to read the broken modules we generated before
the verifier was able to catch this.

rdar://64870641

Reviewers: yrouban, t.p.northover, dexonsmith, arphaman, aprantl

Reviewed By: aprantl

Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, jkorous, ributzka, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83699
2020-07-23 09:07:15 -07:00