7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Luo, Yuanke
5159be3c9b (Reland) [fastalloc] Support allocating specific register class in fastalloc
This reverts commit 853bb192c407f5d9e75a5fd55cc089151530cbd3.
2022-08-20 13:25:34 +08:00
Luo, Yuanke
853bb192c4 Revert "(Reland) [fastalloc] Support allocating specific register class in fastalloc"
This reverts commit 30f9e6ebd30b79d13f99eaca4d829e0da07186b3.
2022-08-15 20:33:15 +08:00
Luo, Yuanke
30f9e6ebd3 (Reland) [fastalloc] Support allocating specific register class in fastalloc
Reland commit 719658d078c4

The base RA support infrastructure that only allow a specific register
class be allocated in RA pss. Since greedy RA, basic RA derived from
base RA, they all allow allocating specific register class. Fast RA
doesn't support allocating register for specific register class. This
patch is to enable ShouldAllocateClass in fast RA, so that it can
support allocating register for specific register class.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131825
2022-08-13 13:57:34 +08:00
Nico Weber
851a5efe45 Revert "[fastalloc] Support allocating specific register class in fastalloc"
This reverts commit 719658d078c4093d1ee716fb65ae94673df7b22b.
Breaks a few things, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D128437
There's disagreement about the best fix.
So let's keep HEAD green while discussions are happening.
2022-06-23 10:44:24 -04:00
Luo, Yuanke
719658d078 [fastalloc] Support allocating specific register class in fastalloc
The base RA support infrastructure that only allow a specific register
class be allocated in RA pss. Since greedy RA, basic RA derived from
base RA, they all allow allocating specific register class. Fast RA
doesn't support allocating register for specific register class. This
patch is to enable ShouldAllocateClass in fast RA, so that it can
support allocating register for specific register class.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126771
2022-06-23 14:42:04 +08:00
Venkata Ramanaiah Nalamothu
04fff547e2 [AMDGPU] Move call clobbered return address registers s[30:31] to callee saved range
Currently the return address ABI registers s[30:31], which fall in the call
clobbered register range, are added as a live-in on the function entry to
preserve its value when we have calls so that it gets saved and restored
around the calls.

But the DWARF unwind information (CFI) needs to track where the return address
resides in a frame and the above approach makes it difficult to track the
return address when the CFI information is emitted during the frame lowering,
due to the involvment of understanding the control flow.

This patch moves the return address ABI registers s[30:31] into callee saved
registers range and stops adding live-in for return address registers, so that
the CFI machinery will know where the return address resides when CSR
save/restore happen during the frame lowering.

And doing the above poses an issue that now the return instruction uses undefined
register `sgpr30_sgpr31`. This is resolved by hiding the return address register
use by the return instruction through the `SI_RETURN` pseudo instruction, which
doesn't take any input operands, until the `SI_RETURN` pseudo gets lowered to the
`S_SETPC_B64_return` during the `expandPostRAPseudo()`.

As an added benefit, this patch simplifies overall return instruction handling.

Note: The AMDGPU CFI changes are there only in the downstream code and another
version of this patch will be posted for review for the downstream code.

Reviewed By: arsenm, ronlieb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114652
2022-03-09 12:18:02 +05:30
Austin Kerbow
8470bf2b08 [AMDGPU] Do not reserve any VGPR for SGPR spills
After the split register allocation changes in eebe841a47cb it is no
longer necessary to reserve a VGPR before RA. This can also create bugs
when IPRA is enabled since we cannot predict that a called function may
not reserve any register if it does not have any SGPR spills. If that
happens those functions may override reserved registers that are
normally callee saved. Added a test to show this.

Fixes: SWDEV-309900

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115551
2022-01-11 22:14:59 -08:00